as christians so readily enthuse,......... god was the creator of the universe.
If so,...... what was his method, on his said, supposed creation.
.............................. MATTER OR ENERGY ............................
If matter can PRODUCE energy,........ but energy is needed to PROCESS matter,...... in which order did he supposedly place each,.....the matter 1st and the energy second,...... or the energy 1st, and the matter 2nd.
Or,........ did he place,...... each neck and neck,...... or combine the both of them into 1 single unit.
What was his formula for his supposed creation?
View points are sought from both creationists,..... and atheists.
2007-05-03 06:19:33 · 13 answers · asked by peanut 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
In physical cosmology, the Big Bang is the scientific theory that the universe emerged from a tremendously dense and hot state about 13.7 billion years ago.
OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE (not a lame pamphlet) for the Big Bang includes the analysis of the spectrum of light from galaxies which REVEAL a shift towards longer wavelengths proportional to each galaxy's distance in a relationship described by Hubble's law. If this observation that galaxies are moving away from us is not at any special position in the universe (the Copernican principle), then this suggests that space itself is expanding. Extrapolation of this expansion back in time yields an initial state in the distant past in which all matter and energy was at an immense temperature and density. This initial state is the key premise of Big Bang theory.
THEORETICAL SUPPORT for the Big Bang comes from mathematical models, called Robertson-Walker models, which show that a Big Bang is consistent with general relativity and with the principle that properties of the universe should be independent of position or orientation (the cosmological principle).
The Big Bang model PREDICTS the rates at which various elements are synthesized in the early universe, as originally suggested by Alpher, Bethe, and Gamow. Modern (and more refined) calculations of this process, known as Big Bang nucleosynthesis (BBN), produce results that are consistent with observations of the present universe.
The Big Bang model ALSO PREDICTS the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB), a background of weak microwave radiation filling the whole universe. The discovery of the CMB in 1964 led to the general acceptance amongst physicists of the Big Bang as the BEST THEORY OF THE ORIGIN AND EVOLUTION OF THE COSMOS.
2007-05-03 06:25:50 · answer #1 · answered by Malcolm Knoxville VI 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I never heard of him untill just now. However, it's very worrying that one of his videos is about the watchmaker argument. The watchmaker argument is an entire SCHOOL OF THOUGHT that I completely disagree with; that you can determine ANYTHING just by looking at something. This is not how Science works at all. And you can NOT accurately determine anything just by looking at something. And no, there was no "watchmaker" these days most watches are made by robots or by an assembly line. Or, maybe if you look closely, mabe it's not a watch at all. Maybe it's chocolate, or a toy. Or a bomb.
2016-05-19 21:37:29 · answer #2 · answered by lina 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you are taking intelligent design a little too literally. When a creationist talks about intelligent design, they don't really mean that God was so smart and applied real science to his creation. They mean that God waved his magic wand and poof it happened. If I am wrong, then why have I seen dozens of people wearing t-shirts that say "I believe in big bang theory. God spoke and BANG it happened."
2007-05-03 06:30:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Touch of confusion on the matter/energy thing: matter is condensed energy. They're really different forms of the same thing.
CD
2007-05-03 06:26:32 · answer #4 · answered by Super Atheist 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If we had all the anwers there wouldn't be a debate. God's ways are His ways, we may never understand. But, even while we cannot satisfy the non-believer with a better answer, the non-believer certainly can't account for the world's existence and beginning either. So, as for empirical evidence, it's a wash. To me, it's a matter of faith, I just know that something (God) bigger, and smarter than me, is behind it.
2007-05-03 06:25:31 · answer #5 · answered by Scott B 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The Christians will probably say that we can't know, and that it doesn't matter, because who cares how God did it, the point is that he did it.
The atheists say that it didn't happen at all that way.
2007-05-03 06:28:36 · answer #6 · answered by mom2nandn 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What? I thought it was creationism v/s evolution. You think Atheists are the only ones believing in evolution? I know some well-educated christians believing in evolution as well.
And I think they're in majority!
Creationism is the dumbest thing anyone can ever imagine. Ofcourse there are plenty of jerks that do follow it still.
2007-05-03 06:25:16 · answer #7 · answered by Honest christian 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I just need to be the annoying person who points out that:
Not all Christians are creationists.
Not all evolutionists are Atheists.
2007-05-03 06:34:22 · answer #8 · answered by hazydaze 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
its more like harry potter using e = mc^2 to convert mass into energy .seems funny to me
u cant combine 2 views like that .
2007-05-03 06:29:08 · answer #9 · answered by saggy 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There are many gods, they are all shes. Their formula remains unknown at this time
2007-05-03 06:24:36 · answer #10 · answered by Rae 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋