2007-05-03 05:53:31 · 5 answers · asked by zclifton2 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Yes, and they're not going to implement the end game plan until every single one of them has lined up a very high paying job with one of the Military-Industrial Complex corporations having made billions of dollars in profits off the Iraq War.
2007-05-03 06:06:01 · answer #1 · answered by Ben 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The only secret I can see is how bringing the troops home prematurely will benefit the long term prospects of not having to go back to the middle east again very soon. Iran thumbs its nose at the international community daily and is completely out of control. When push comes to shove, who do do ya thing their gonna call? Not ghostbusters!!! If the world waits until the U.N. acts, a lot of folks may be glowing in the dark or living underground for the next hundred years. Of course their are a lot of people in this country that are willing to take that risk-that is, of course, until its their hide on the line. That's a horse of a different color and you will be able to hear their wailing for miles. Of course, by that time its too late to put the genie back in the bottle. Either you confront evil or be consumed by it. Its really your choice. Choose badly and you and your children will reap the rewards for a long long time. No hype...just fact. It may not be a pleasant fact. But that doesn't make it less true. Do you want the next President to take that risk for you and yours? After all, thats what it all boils down to. As for as the current conflict is concerned, Iraq is ours to win or lose. It all depends on how much intestinal fortitude we possess. From where I sit, thats not a whole hell of a lot. Unlike Vietnam, this is not an enemy you can run away from. They have vowed to fight and die until they are victorious-not just Iraq but worldwide. They know the American public has no stomach to protect themselves in the long haul. We have something on our hands you just can't wash off. Eventually we will pay the price for apathy and resignation. Fight now or fight later-or not.
2007-05-03 13:23:07 · answer #2 · answered by Rich S 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, according to them, it would be a misrepresentation - a polite term for a lie. It could even be interpreted as a lie intended to aid the enemy - sedition. Sedition is not currently illegal, however. Exposing military secrets, OTOH, could be a crime. The fact that no one's been charged for making such statements would tend to indicate they are not being viewed as 'Top Secret.'
2007-05-03 13:01:43 · answer #3 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
There you go believing that lame lieberal news media.
We already won the war Saddam is dead, now it's just clean up and keep the innocent Iraqis as safe as possible.
2007-05-03 13:08:43 · answer #4 · answered by Kevin A 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I couldn't make any sense of the question. Maybe you can reword it or add some details.
2007-05-03 13:00:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋