Do you agree or disagree with this definition? Explain.?

Question

Evangelist Reinhard Bonnke stated the definition for atheism is intellectual vandalism.

Answer 1

i would say ''spiritual abandonment''

Answer 2

"Intellectual vandalism"? What sort of silly nonsense is that? I define Reinhard Bonnke as "an accordion-wielding chimpanzee with toothpaste-management issues". Makes just as much sense...

Answer 3

I disagree. When an evangelist says ANYTHING I immediateley mistrust them. Personally I think he read that term somewhere and is using it wherever he can. Like giving a hammer to a person who thinks the worlds problems are nail. He is simply hammering everything as intellectual vandalism.

Answer 4

No I do not agree with Reinhard Bonnke 's definition for atheism..Atheism is the belief that there is no God or denial that god exist.But you know that Einstein stated that religion without science is lame and science without religion is blind
.So science and religion should exist for complementary of our lives.,because we need both of them.
One who denies the existence of God is against with the reality. that we are created by God and we will come back to God after death.Atheism is contradictory of intellectuality that acknowledged the existence of God.

Answer 5

relies upon who you attraction to (infants, adolescents, Adults, or maybe which gender you are trying too attraction to) and who's advertising you (television, Magazines) elect whether you're good or no longer, than something. in short what makes music is Melody, solidarity and correctly, gadgets, the 1st 2 have been fairly alienated, it style of feels something with some thrown jointly jangly sounding guitar chords will do, and the lead singer can the two basically scream, groan or basically use a "super" accessory with a greater "conversing" type than making a music. Then once you have mainstream guides plastering the stated issues above as "good" or the "suited" music; what then defines the familiar of music has a tendency to have been decreased, that's have been the argument of skills/skills to play an tool is asserted, for good reason too. etc. :O

Answer 6

Disagree. It appears to me that the burden of proof is on theists, not atheists. The point that atheists are intellectual vandals is not valid. Atheists usually counter arguments that God exists based on reason (lack of evidence).

Answer 7

Spiritual vandalism, perhaps, although that sounds unnecessarily harsh.

By definition, atheism must destroy all religious belief systems in order to reject them. To decide to not belief in gods/goddesses is to place the onus on oneself to find evidence against every one of them known.

Answer 8

This is absolutely false. The definition of Atheism is an absence of a spiritual belief system.

Brightest Blessings

Answer 9

Numerous sociological studies have shown this man's statement to be patently false. There is a negative correlation between religiosity and education so the opposite of his claim would be true.

The more educated you are, the less likely you are to be religious (NOTE: I am NOT saying "all religious people are stupid").

Answer 10

I am a christian, . atheist are not destroying anything that belongs to christians, our hearts are open and we are protected by the Lord. We wake up each morning with our minds so firmly on Jesus that nothing can weaken it enough to destroy it. To destroy anything you must find its weakest point. the faithful don't have any, we have Jesus.

Answer 11

Having a spirit a filled with GOD'S love has no comparison