English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Let's say we provide a path to amnesty for illegal immigrants. What does that say about the value we place on our immigration laws? Why, it shows that they don't really mean anything important. So, we might as well just open are borders -- outside of building a wall, they're just going to keep coming, ESPECIALLY if they know they can get amnesty.

Do you realize what that would do to us? Almost overnight we would have a huge, dirt-poor underclass to support. They don't speak our language, and have no skills or education to offer us. Do you realize that our system could not handle that? Our society could not cope with open borders, but that is exactly what amnesty means. America is not capable of supporting the world's poor. We are capable of helping them reform their own countries, slowly and steadilty, but if we open our borders, we will lose that ability. They will drag us down with them, and we will not have helped them. Is that what you want?

2007-05-02 09:41:29 · 20 answers · asked by Free Ranger 4 in Politics & Government Immigration

Okay, there's two ways this can work: No Amnesty and No Wall.
Amnesty and a Very Big Wall.

Either way we have to get tough on employers that hire them.

2007-05-02 09:50:48 · update #1

20 answers

Amnesty did not work the first time around in fact it tripled (at least) the problem. Your right we can only stand so much before we as a country buckle beneath the weight of helping others.

2007-05-02 09:53:36 · answer #1 · answered by M B 5 · 3 2

I am afraid that the race for cheap labor and adding to the bottom line of the business lobby, not to mention our law makers desired not only to be reelected but line their own pockets, are selling out this country.
Srive: Do you really think that we should care about wealthy people that can't visit because they have work permits?
As to kids needing documents to go to school, first I think the Supreme Court ruled that illegals aliens and their children have the right to attend school, and if they needed documents they would buy them on the street like all the other phony documente they use

2007-05-02 10:06:54 · answer #2 · answered by jean 7 · 1 0

i think of you have become some very insensitive comments. it is the deal, I trust the two between the viewpoints provided here. on the single hand, it may look unfair to punish a baby who in actuality did no longer something incorrect. it relatively is great which you have become an coaching and which you're no longer enticing in crime, it relatively is many times what happens in case you may no longer take part in coaching. whether, on the different hand, the conservatives have a element to in that we ought to continuously no longer reward undesirable habit. If we proceed to offer reward to illegals, even to their toddlers who did no longer something incorrect, that sends a message to skill unlawful immigrants that they might get freebies without punishment. If i replaced into an unlawful immigrant in, we could say Mexico, and that i merely found out that i ought to circulate the border and my youngsters ought to get a unfastened coaching and a good number of different perks, i could come working over. this could merely worsen our unlawful immigration difficulty. in addition to, it may be much extra complicated as maximum illegals do no longer pay taxes, so in actuality illegals could be getting freebies without even having to pay into the gadget. Do you notice the difficulty here?

2016-10-04 06:52:12 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

There should be an amnesty for people that can support themselves. A conditional green card that if you try to get help from the government it will be taken away. Why not help people that really want to be here and really want to be part of society by paying taxes.

2007-05-02 10:03:31 · answer #4 · answered by Scarlet 3 · 3 1

We already support them would it not make more sense to know where they are. I think amnesty is good if done correctly. I do not think this can be an over night fix. we need to set ground rules like time in states time back where they came from before coming to states and all that other stuff. I think there should be a law that says they have to have a sponser family here. Most have someone legal here. there are ways tomake it work but the politicians have to move slowly and get it right.

2007-05-02 09:48:07 · answer #5 · answered by debbie f 5 · 5 3

There is a difference between open borders and an amnesty. I haven't heard one person demanding that the united states open its border they are asking that they be granted a legal status so that they may do things the right way.

I know a lot of people that have work permits and are very wealthy but cant visit their family in their country of origin. Are you aware that to be able to go to school you need to be legal, and in case you dint know not all illegal immigrants are uneducated as you think. There are illegal immigrants that have a masters but can't put it to use because they are in fact illegal!

2007-05-02 09:47:14 · answer #6 · answered by If the mask fits... 5 · 4 4

Let me tell you something you say they have no education for you guys to accept them, well I see a lot of you guys don't have education and do you see me complain and saying get out of here.. You say they are low class well i tell you that if they had the same opportunities as you and have a better job then you.. will you believe me?.. probably not but they are able to do that.. A lot of them are excellent citizens that even pay their taxes... good parents.. a role model for their children's and being a parent it's hard and is like everyone is saying they don't deserve to be here.. what I think it's that they are a role model for us to as citizens.. Coming from nothing to what they are and being able to buy their houses and so much more is something to honor..

2007-05-02 10:45:08 · answer #7 · answered by latina 3 · 2 1

We did amnesty and we were told that would stop it. All it did was make 3 times the number show up asking again. Why not just take over Mexico and be done with it.

2007-05-02 09:45:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

"... They don't speak our language, and have no skills..." WAIT, they do have skills, if not they wouldn't have jobs here! Also we are in a dilemma right now because even though it would not make us "look good," according to you, it is the only solution to the problem. Sometimes the best way to handle a situation is not to do what you think is "right," it's about doing what's the most convenient. If we deport 20 million illegals today, we will get 40 million tomorrow, and there is no wall that can stop them. Mass deportation would have many negative consequences, maybe even worse than illegal immigration itself. Now, I'm not saying that all of them should be granted legalization: it would be a selective process that not only fines them, but also sends them to the back of the line.

2007-05-02 09:53:27 · answer #9 · answered by Siervocal 4 · 1 5

Our society is already coping with thier presence, Amnesty would just be one way of taking our collective head out of the sand on the issue.

And, there's nothing hypothetical about it, Amnesty has been done before, only with about 1/5th the number of illegal aliens, but it didn't destroy the country. It could be argued, though, that the past amnesty encouraged the flood of illegal immigration that has the total population of illegal aliens pushing past the 12 million mark.

2007-05-02 09:47:50 · answer #10 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 2 4

fedest.com, questions and answers