A selection of Priests have rightly received the media treatment they deserved.It seems, though, that they have tainted some Genuine Priestly Believers; Wether or not you believe in what these priests believe in, I have met Priests, "Brothers" and "Religious" who lived a life that was genuine. I was taught at HSC ( Higher School Certificate) by a Marist Brother who was humble, was known for his ethics, and when it came to his faith, stood his ground, explained what he believed, and said this is what I believe. He invited others to join in his faith, and to those who were interested, he explained.
A far cry for me, from the Anglican Minister at a School who used his power to abuse young children at a School I attended. I told the powers what he had done, but no-one believed. I had also been assaulted by a teacher there, no-one believed. About ten years after I left the school he was convicted of assaulting a Neibhour with a hammer.
Have a Few bad characters affected many good people?
2007-05-02
09:18:17
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Mictlan_KISS
6
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
The Genuine Priests are priests who "Say what they Mean and Mean what they Say". Not everyone has the same assumptions, not everyone reaches the same conclusions.Not everyone has the same idea of Truth. But in many ways, the Priests have to be Consistent, so the Definition of Truth which talks of Consistency would apply to them.
What I am interested in, basically, is has the media, at key points, or people, at key points, fallen to the Fallacy of "Universals can be Fully Converted" , i.e. this Priest is a Pervert, therefore All Priests are Perverts; which is not correct. Even if you suppose their Books of Faith to be inherently untrue, they have, due to repetition ( and this is only a rhetorical point) "Become true"; so they are true if only on that level. They are therefore true in ONE possible world
2007-05-03
01:19:15 ·
update #1