English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

My toddler son (16 months old) gets into everything and I'm trying to teach him to mind. My mom and mother in law think I'm a wimp because I don't spank him. Redirection, giving him toys or other distractions, do not work at all. If he wants to do something, nothing will stop him. I can't get him to sit still for a time out. He also doesn't understand any language yet. I can't keep him in a cage, and I'm running out of ways to babyproof. Oh yeah, he also wants to climb all the time. What do I do? Are my mom and mother-in-law right? Will I raise a terror if I don't spank?

2007-05-02 07:13:55 · 38 answers · asked by Graciela, RIRS 6 in Pregnancy & Parenting Parenting

38 answers

No, you should raise your child the way you want. He is 16 months..and just exploring. I think you should try getting down to his level and using a stern voice. I don't spank my son..and I refuse to. This usually works for him...and being consistent is key.

2007-05-02 07:18:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 8 2

You will *not* raise a terror if you don't spank.

Personally, I do spank in extreme occasions (not listening and running into the street, things like that), and while my youngest is very active, he is not a terror. Also, I believe that 16 months is too young to spank. If he's too young to understand going into time-out, he's too young to understand that spanking is a consequence to his actions.

The things that I have found to be the most effective are consistency and fairness. When I say fairness, I don't mean that your child goes unpunished or is even happy at the end of the scenerio, but rather that you as the parent punish appropriately for the infraction. You as the parent will know what is fair.

The MIL and the mother... they come from a different era. When my oldest was a baby, I was constantly told by the older generation to "just let her cry.. its good for her". Perhaps that philosophy worked for the older generation, but it's not the philosophy that I wish to parent by, so I just said "thank you for the advice.." and did it my way. For some reason the older folks seem to think that the "spare the rod and spoil the child" is true. I know many fine upstanding citizens who are not spoiled and yet were not spanked.

Stick to your guns, take a deep breath when dealing with the family members and remember that you are probably doing a great job... It just takes time!

2007-05-02 07:28:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Your mom and mother-in-law grew up in a different time when spanking was the thing to do, but as I remember as a kid, a spanking was easier because it was over with quickly!!! I hated it more when I had to sit in a chair or have my priviledges taken away! You are the mommy now, and I am sure they both mean well, you get to decide what is right for you and your child.
I have only spanked my daughter once, and that was for running into the road and she almost got hit by a car! Other than that, I found that by gating off an area (I did it for my living room) and making that room as baby proof as possible was really a help to give her a free space to play. I think 16 month olds may not understand language as well as older children, but they do understand being removed from the undesirable behavior, and having to sit in a chair, or having a toy removed, that kind of thing. You can say, for example, " I don't want you climbing, and if you climb I will make you sit in a chair/take away your toy". Also, I would say "you did this, and this is why I am putting you in the chair/taking the toy away." This is more practice for you but I am sure he will understand as he gets older. You have to be diligent though, and if he gets out of the chair, put him back into it...to reinforce that you mean what you say. I also told my daughter in advance (as she got older) what behaviors I would not find acceptable, and what the punishment would be if she did those behaviors. I also would give a warning (say for example when she would be fooling around with the TV or something) that she needed to stop and then count to 3 to give her more than enough warning to either stop or be punished. Eventually, if we were in a store/in public all I had to do was raise my hand and start raising one finger, then two, and she knew what would happen if I got to three! It is very very difficult, and believe me I sympathize!!!. But, the alternative is trying to establish that discipline later and having to work even harder to have them respect you and listen to what you say.


I

2007-05-02 07:32:50 · answer #3 · answered by holligolitelee66 2 · 1 0

I agree with the consistency and stern voice.
But, at that age, they do not have cognitive reasoning, so a "conversation" isn't going to be processed - hence, it won't have any effect.
You still need to get his attention and force is very effective at that. Spanking is a form of force and if used correctly is OK. Unfortunately, it is an action that a small child can repeat (and they will repeat everything), so if you spank it has to be on the bottom so they can't really "see" and won't repeat. The other options are pinching and "thudding" (flicking your finger onto their nuckle). It gets the child's attention, doesn't hurt much, and is something a child can't repeat because they aren't strong enough.

The other option is 'hold in place', as someone else mentioned. If it is a boy, I use the hand on the back of the neck to hold him. If he wiggles too much, I will sit him down or lay him on his belly and hold him down like a dog. And - mentally & emotionally - a small child is not much more mature than a dog being trained, so the same techniques are effective. For girls I recommend holding her in your lap or on the chair next to you, with a hand on her shoulder so that she cannot leave. Either way, they may scream a bit put putting your face in theirs tends to intimidate and cause them to pay attention - which is what you wanted in the first place.

In regards to your last question, we've raised many, many generations of children whose discipline was spanking. It has only been these most recent generations who were not spanked due to changing social norms. Now look at the society we've got. It almost makes one wonder if spanking shouldn't be mandatory. :)

You will certainly raise a terror if he isn't taught respect. That's why it is one of The Ten Commandments, after all.

2007-05-02 07:31:19 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 2 0

As foster parents, we are NOT allowed to spank, so we have to come up with alternatives.

a 16 month old is exploring - sounds like a very smart little guy. However, you are giving him too much control over you (by saying "if we wants something, nothing will stop him").

I keep my younger kids busy by letting them "wash dishes" (which is actually playing in the sink with water and plastic dishes). Time outs don't work, but ignoring him will. At that age, we really need to be with kids at all times - to say "no - that might hurt you", or to pick him up and bring him into a different room.

Climbing kids are really a challenge. Check out some helpful suggestions at www.disciplinehelp.com. Without knowing what is in your home, what you've already tried, and what you're willing to do, it's hard to make suggestions.

For climbing kids, I would highly suggest a playroom where there are soft mats and nothing major he can climb on. Then, if he climbs in other rooms, you can bring him to his "safe room" until he learns not to climb. However, I know this would be very difficult in our small home.

You will NOT raise a terror if you don't spank. However, you WILL raise a terror if you let the child control you and your home. As long as the child is safe, ignoring negative behavior works best at this age, as long as it is coupled with lots and lots of attention when he is acting appropriately.

2007-05-02 07:26:45 · answer #5 · answered by Donna B 3 · 3 0

You shouldn't think that spanking is a bad form of punishment, My mother wasn't afraid to pinken up my butt when I was bad and I have nothing but love and respect for her. U could use the counting to 3 and putting in time out but that generally leads to the child doing whatever for 2 more sec and using whatever amount of time in the corner to figure out his next terrorist act. You need to let your Yes mean yes and your no mean no. You don't want to be one of those mom's in the store with the screaming toddler who is mad because he didn't get the cereal or toy he wanted, I learned real quick if My mom said no we better not argue or we had a tanning coming when we got home so Like I said before I love my mother she spanked us and we still respect her for it today, she is my best friend.

PS: I have been reading some of the other answers and I would just like to let people know that I have no physiological disorders or feelings of hate or anything because I was spanked as a child.. That is just ridiculous

2007-05-02 07:32:51 · answer #6 · answered by YouAsked4it 3 · 1 0

no there is nothing wrong with not spanking but heres what i would do although it might be hard because he doesnt sit during a time out but its the best possible way to teach your child what hes doing wrong....when he does whatever it is that he does take him and put his nose in the corner for time out keep redirecting him there stand there with him if you have to to make him stay tell him when he calms down and stops crying he can come out or if he is not crying keep him there for how ever old he is so since hes about 1 1/2 keep him there for a full min. n a half...then when he has eaither stopped crying or his time is up explain to him is short and simple sentences what he has done wrong and why yooh put him in time out and y its bad for him to do what ever he did be patient it prolly wont work the first time but after a few times he will begin to learn!! good luck
=)Livie

2007-05-02 07:26:58 · answer #7 · answered by Olivia B 3 · 2 0

First of all, no, your mother and mother-in-law are not right. You don't have to spank your child to discipline him. At this age, even if he knows he shouldn't do something, everything in his little body is saying, "Do it. Do it." all the time. It's normal--toddlers want to explore.

I suggest this book: Raising Your Spirited Child: A Guide for Parents Whose Child Is More Intense, Sensitive, Perceptive, Persistent, Energetic (Paperback)
by Mary Sheedy Kurcinka

I saw Ms. Kurcinka speak at a parenting event I attended, and her approach makes a lot of sense. It's all about using misbehavior to teach your child more appropriate behavior. All children misbehave. Mothers and Mothers-in-law who say, "My kids never" are having memory loss.

If you really think your child doesn't understand any language yet, I'd have his hearing checked. He should understand what you're saying--it's more likely that he understands you but doesn't have the self-control to stop what he's doing.

Continue redirecting, move things away, and try holding him for a time-out if you think he actually understands that he's violated a rule. But I think at 16 months it may be too early for time-out.

This is normal. I'd suggest spending less time with your mom/mil and more time with other moms of young toddlers. That might give you a better idea of what is realistic at this age.

2007-05-02 07:22:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6 1

i'd say concepts your own organisation. it is your brother's newborn, and it really is his excellent to self-discipline her as he chooses, short of kid abuse. there is honestly no longer something incorrect with spanking. My mom and father spanked all their little ones, and that i surely purely had to be swatted a nil.5-dozen circumstances in my life. the different time i presumed about misbehaving, I took the further 2 seconds to comprehend what the outcomes will be, and did not do it. by the years, i realized why my mom and father had regulations hostile to certain issues. and that i daresay my siblings and that i grew up a recommendations extra nicely-behaved than maximum children, and we surely are not violent. i can surely say that i'm happy my mom and father spanked me. it really is not any longer "violence", it really is showing outcomes to little ones that are not fazed with the help of "time-outs" or the different non-technique of self-discipline. i recognize it really is not any longer what you had to hearken to, and that i can't get any factors right here, yet I felt I had to assert something. btw. I purely graduated with optimal honors in engineering, and received a Fulbright fellowship to study overseas next 3 hundred and sixty 5 days... did spanking ruin my life? i imagine no longer. Edit: that is a debate without unmarried answer. you'd be living evidence that there is not any favor for that type of self-discipline FOR YOU, yet different little ones (the unholy terrors of the community) would take advantage of it. and that i'm living evidence that spanking would not harm some human beings, yet i am going to freely admit that there are likely children that would have problems with it. it really is the reason it will be left as a lot because the mum and father to pick, on condition that they're finally responsible for his or her little ones and recognize their little ones a recommendations extra effective than every person else.

2016-11-24 21:01:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Spanking him really wouldn't do any good. He'd still be getting the attention (even if it is negative) that's causing him to act out. The discipline you choose really depends on what the action is. I know you say he doesn't understand language yet, but you'd be surprised at how much they get. They know when you are upset/disappointed/etc. at them. You just have to be consistant in whatever method you choose. Stand your ground. I'm a big fan of time out to discourage unwanted behavior. I know you said he won't sit still, but that's when you just have to put him back in the timeout spot. When he misbehaves, explain that the behavior is unacceptable and if he does it again he'll be placed in timeout. Then, the VERY NEXT TIME he does that behavior, immediately place him in timeout. Tell him he has timeout and take him to the timeout spot. Do not pay anymore attention to him. Walk away. If he gets up, Do NOT speak to him or anything. Just pick him up and set him back in time out. Refuse to give him the attention he craves until he demonstrates that he deserves it. I

2007-05-02 07:36:58 · answer #10 · answered by growler 2 · 2 0

First of all, he understands some language. You have to figure it out what it is and use it. Don't explain things to him like he's 8 years old. Use small phrases. Let him know that you know what he wants to do. exmp. "you want to go up, up, up. No, no up. Down." And stop him or take him down. If and when he goes back up, discipline. To the bedroom (screaming and all) or play yard. You can't let him win. And never make threats without carrying them out. That's a no no. If you're not going to do it, don't say it. It will make you less credible. Condition him to the unrelenting consequence of his action. If he's misbehaving during his timeout....*sigh* you may have to spank him. It's better you now, than the cops later. He needs to learn that there are rules and rules must be followed...or else, and there are no second chances. Don't repeat yourself or reason with him. exmp. "are you gonna stop, are you gonna stop?!" Tell him NO, if he does anyway PUNISH.

2007-05-02 07:32:07 · answer #11 · answered by BumbleBee 2 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers