DID RIGHTEOUS MUSLIMS have the righteous right to INVADE INDIA and murder millions of peace loving budhists?

Question

I admitt that ever since I learned about Islam, historically, in doctrine and in todays world, I have become filled with contempt for the greatest force of savage self righteousness ever cursed on humanity....but I have yet to be convinced by silly Christians or leftists that "hate" is always bad...sometimes its necessary for self preservation...granted it can get out of control.

What should I have felt when I first read the accounts, hidden from my previously ethnocentric education, of historys greatest genocide?

WARNING: BEFORE YOU KNEE JERK APOLOGETICS FOR THE GREATEST GENOCIDE IN ALL HUMAN HISTORY...READ ABOUT THE F**** THING FIRST.

Although I am agnostic, I neverthless say, surely there can be no heaven or eternal reward for any filthy person who willingly or by negligence would apologize or minimize genocide.

The citation I shall post below is literally from the most credible scholar on the period BEFORE 911!!! No axe to grind here.

Genocide and Islam: Chapter 4 - Islam and the Muslim Invasions “Let it be said right away: the massacres perpetuated by Muslims in India are unparalleled in history, bigger than the Holocaust of the Jews by the Nazis; or the massacre of the Armenians by the Turks” http://www.nalanda.nitc.ac.in/resources/english/etext-project/history/gautier/chapter4.html

Answer 1

No one has right to kill innocents.

I read the site you suggested.
The whole write-up is good collection of portions of history or parts and bits of history without context. And leave a good anti Muslim image to the readers, who have no history knowledge or very low history knowledge, plus absolutely no knowledge of the religion as well.

Writer of your site very cleverly tried to mould mind towards antimuslim thoughts.
Writer even quoted wrong translation of Basic Muslim Shahada (Words of Submission), that shows either writer do not understand language or intentionally trying to misguide people. In any case it is crime against humanity to misguide from original subject or matter.

First of all, I will try to correct your quotation from that write up.
You OR your writer Quoted, " The limitations of Islam? This is the profession of faith of a Muslim:" I certify that there is no other God than Allah, of whom Mohammed is the only prophet " Which means in effect: " After (and before) Mohammed, there is nobody else, no more avatars ". Thus the whole religion of Islam is based on a negation: nobody but us, no other religion but ours. And if you disagree, you shall die ". This puts a serious limitation to tolerance and from this strong belief sprang all the horrors of the Muslim invasions of India.

On contrary Muslim say as word of submission:
"There is no God, but Allah (s.w.t.), and Muhammad (p.b.u.h.), is His messenger."
These wordings does not say Prophet Muhammad is the only Prophet or messenger of The God.
Wording says Only one true God is for worship and Muhammad is His Messenger, that means Muslims (Who submits there will to the will of The God Almighty), are witnessing that Muhammad as prophet of God taught them that there is only one God, Supreme being, only Creator, Provider, Only Sustainer.
And Muhammad is the Prophet as human.
Now when a Muslim witness this then a Muslim has to read, accept, and practice Qura'n. Book revealed to Prophet Muhammad (pbuh).
And Qura'n teaches that The God Almighty has sent several Prophets, and messengers for the guidance of humanity.
Muslims does believe on other messengers and Prophets of Almighty. See from Qura'n:

"Righteous is he who believes in Allah and the Last Day and the Angels and the Scriptures and the Prophets." -- Qura’n 2:177

According to one of the sayings of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), God Almighty has send almost 124,000 Prophets and messengers in deferent times, deferent places, and deferent nations, to teach and guide humanity.
Prophet Adam (pbuh), was the first Prophet, and including Prophets Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus (Peace and blessings of The God Almighty on all of them), are mentioned by name in Qura'n. Qura'n mentioned 25 names.

After briefly showing glimpses of your wrong quotations about Muslim faith and belief I will come towards your History section. Again I will just give some glimpses about your and your writer's wrong twisting approach on History.

See below: These came up during recent Babri Masjid case.

"Evidences about Ayodhya doubtful"
Lucknow: Mahant Dharam Das’s witness Bishan Bahadur (who is also a historian) while deposing before the special commissioner Hari Shankar Dubey in Babri Masjid ownership case on the second day admitted that Ayodhya‘s history is missing in many cases and whatever proofs or evidences are available are doubtful. In reply to Zafaryab Jilani’s queries, he contradicted his own statement made the previous day that Mohammad Ghauri and Shahabuddin Ghauri are two different persons. He said today (on 27 April) that both are the same person. He said that he had made a wrong statement because he had high blood pressure. ..............
...............
He further said in his statement that Ayodhya’s Guptar Ghat is not mentioned in history but its tradition is very old. He also agreed with Neville’s views, as mentioned in his book, that Ayodhya’s existence is from ancient times but its complete history is not available. He also agreed with the writing in the historian Dr Sushil’s history book that whatever evidences about Ayodhya are available are doubtful. He said that during the periods of Moghul kings Jahangir and Shahjahan, Ayodhya’s importance had very much increased. He also admitted that there was no political or religious activity in Ayodhya from 650 AD to 1050 CE. (Rashtriya Sahara, April 28, 2005)..........................
................
Ghauri did not attack AyodhyaLucknow: Mahant Dharam Das’s witness in the Babri Masjid ownership case, Bishan Bahadur who is also a historian said in response to a question by Zafaryab Jilani that the king Mohammad Ghauri had never attacked Ayodhya.

Answer 2

Hey, thanks for posting this! Not only is it FINALLY a positive post (LOL!), and not only does it say something positive about the Muslims, but also it's coming from the source of Jews rather than seeming like a PR campaing secretly hosted by Muslims (which so many people claim we do, lol!). Thank you so much and I think it would be a really interesting exhibit! Again, everybody seems to think that Jews and Muslims hate each other to death and would like nothing more than for the other to disappear, lol! Sheesh, the things some people believe!

Answer 3

Yes they did indeed slaughter many Bhuddists in India,as well as Hindus.Although most Muslims still feel bad about it,some in Pakistan are happy,actually I was wrong!A lot are happy about it,non the less,its not the religion itself,its how its followed,and the world has done a crappy job following religion,any religion.But then again its not only Islam.Jews killed many Christians in the 2000 years ago,and Christians have caused a lot of problems.for example Adolf Hitler was a devout Christian,but the bible had justified him to kill so many millions.And of course there was the conversion period in the dark ages,the Anglo Christians and all kinds of other incidents.

Religion does not cause evil,people do.So I can't call the religion evil,I can call the people evil,although thats only if the religion itself does not have anything evil in it's scriptures.

Answer 4

They have also been killing Hindus and destroying their temple for thousands of years. Just last year a wonderful Guru in the Hare Krishna Tradition had a beautiful temple built in Mani pour. He is a very open minded nonsectarian peace keeping people loving person. Traveled all around the world teaching world peace and loving God in a Universal way. The Muslims bombed his temple he was harmed and two children died and a couple others died. He died months later of a heart attack. But why? he did nothing and was completely nonviolent. We should not tolerate this hellish fanatical demoniac violence and so called idea of religion. it is punishable by God no doubt.

Answer 5

[That's not true, in Islam it's strictly forbidden to kill others with no reason, it's permitted only if they attack Muslims first
22:39] Permission (to fight) is given to those upon whom war is made because they are oppressed, and most surely Allah is well able to assist them;
and I think what you are referring to is what American Christians did to Millions of Indians in America, to millions in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, thousands in Vietnem, thousands if not millions in Irak.........and your list is still going, you have mixed it up perfectly.
I think it's clear if you open your eyes

Answer 6

Since Hitler killed all those Jews, are ALL Germans evil?

Guilt by association.

A logical fallacy.

Answer 7

You know. Before you brought it up, I had no idea that happened.

By the way, where are all the Muslims tonight? They usually show up with all kinds of excuses for their history?

EDIT: Yup. They aren't deflecting their answers back at you. Hmmm. Where are they?

Answer 8

http://usminc.org/islam.html

Answer 9

There is no excuse for it.That religion comes from the pits of hell.Islam is EVIL

Answer 10

Your right