2007-05-01 15:48:37 · 21 answers · asked by The Church Lady 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Close enough!
*drinks!*
2007-05-01 15:52:09 · answer #1 · answered by kaltharion 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
All mutations lead to physical problems, even death.
Mutations are birth defects.
DNA doesn't gain new information, it only shuffles it[offspring, variation in each sepparate species], or looses it[birth defects]
If I tried to live under water, until I could hold my breath a real long time, I still wouldn't have scales or gills...
even if my children were taught to do the same thing, they would stay human...
a thousand generations.... and my family are good swimmers[ something taught ], but still human...
a million years, nothing changes...
still human... because our DNA cannot gain new information... there is no human DNA data for [gills or scales]
so evolution doesn't work... in this case
In another example:
the human eye, extremely complex.
many many random good mutations had to happen all at once for the extreme complexity of the eye to form....
but if they didn't form all at once, the cornea, eyelid, retina, and their linkage to the brain...
the eye would be useless... and we would all be blind, becasue our ancestors would have no use for eyes.[ according to evolution ]...
so the odds had to be perfect... and the brith defects had to be good....lol
Yall just don't know the amount of faith that people place in the idea of Evolution...
lol.. ye shall not question Evolution ... because if ye do... ye shall be condemned and scoffed ... for denying the faith is abomnitible. Praise be to Darwin the Prophet, dirt be upon him.
Continue to believe in whatever story that you call, "science"
here's to the faithful...
*cheers*
2007-05-01 16:05:58 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. Agappae 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The mutations that happen are certainly random. And empirical evidence (real science) has demonstrated what happens by exposing innumerable fruit flies to radiation. So we have proven that mutations do not contribute to survivability. Mutations are virtually always harmful.
So, there is NO mechanism for evolution. There is no way that an organism can exceed the parameters of variation specific to that species. Variation within species and survival of the fittest is the real cause of "evolving" bacteria.
Why are humans prone to cancer, and other degenerative diseases? Why haven't we "evolved" immunity to them? The answer is, mutations have contributed to the weakening of our immune systems over the generations. We are more susceptible to these diseases than our ancestors were. So much for evolution!
2007-05-01 16:25:58 · answer #3 · answered by iraqisax 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Mutations are partially random. Keep in mind mutations are also affected by diet, environment, etc. This means mutations aren't 100% random. Also, natural selection plays a much larger role in evolution; natural selection isn't random.
2007-05-01 15:51:38 · answer #4 · answered by Nowhere Man 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Easy, it can be and has been observed. If god created man and the only mistake he made was to give us free will, how do the bible thumpers answer the question about all the genetic defects we have? The worst mutation is when a perfectly good human starts to believe in god and religion.
2007-05-01 16:01:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It takes much faith to believe in Evolution. Much more than Christians. Evolutionists will go to any lengths to avoid being in the company of Christians, because nothing in this world can convince them that such pathetic people could be right about anything at all. The abhorrence of Christianity drives them to it. Kinda like, "Christians are so wrong that __? MUST be the answer" (fill in the blank)
2007-05-01 15:57:10 · answer #6 · answered by jan_l 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
while i replaced into nonetheless a Christian (and while i replaced into dealing with my short Deist section), i replaced right into a theistic evolutionist. I figured that the act of introduction replaced right into a single 2d, and God replaced into like an infinitely experienced billiards participant with black-field predictive omniscience. God wasn't needed, in step with se. whether it appeared probable (the good Anthropic theory is deceptively suited). The section God might play in that technique is Aquinas' uncaused reason. on an identical time as the cosmological argument might in basic terms factor to a Deist god at maximum, the particular face (Christian, Muslim, Hindu, in spite of) is filled in via hopeful questioning. Theistic evolutionists tend to be agnostic theists, whether they don't be conscious of the word. of course, i can't communicate authoritatively for everybody else, yet that replaced into my journey.
2017-01-09 07:10:55 · answer #7 · answered by gamon 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that you can answer that yourself, if you know how to use a dictionary. Look up random in the dictionary, and you will understand how random events happen by chance.
2007-05-01 17:23:19 · answer #8 · answered by Fred 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How else could random mutations occur? They are random.
2007-05-01 16:06:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Point mutations aren't pointless.
2007-05-01 16:10:38 · answer #10 · answered by novangelis 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How can you believe Noah got all those animals on his boat!??!
Now we've got a bunch of inbred animals, and a bunch of inbred humans as we'd all be decendents of Noah & family.
Whats's withy all the inbreeding in the bible........adam & eve's kids had to inbreed, then Noah's clan had to do it and the animals too!
2007-05-01 15:56:26 · answer #11 · answered by M S 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋