I can't figure out why someone would want o believe in such a HATEFUL mean god.
Exodus 21:15, 17 both say that if a child hits or curses his father, he is to be killed.
Leviticus 20:9 says that if a child curses his mother or father he is to be put to death.
Deuteronomy 21:18-21 requires stoning to death any child who is stubborn or rebellious.
Proverbs 22:15 says you should beat your foolish children with a rod.
Exodus 20:4- Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth:
Deuteronomy 4:23- Take heed unto yourselves, lest ye forget the covenant of the LORD your God, which he made with you, and make you a graven image, or the likeness of any thing, which the LORD thy God hath forbidden thee.
So any of you who have photos are sinners.
This is how F***ed up the BUY BULL is.
2007-05-01 12:10:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Geez, that site is so easy to debunk, it's hard to know where to begin.
I will say this: from reading about the "viability" of Atheism, it is overwhelmingly obvious that the creators of the site don't understand Atheism. It's a negative position, yes...very astute of them to notice it (doubly so on the Internet, where idiots who don't seem to grasp this basic point about the position are in no short supply). However, when you read the page, here's your argument:
1 - Atheism is a lack of belief in a god(s); i.e., a negative
2 - There's no way to prove a negative.
3 - Therefore, Atheism is not provable.
Bertrand Russel once talked about a teacup, orbiting the sun directly between Earth and Mars that was too small to be seen by a telescope, but assured us that it was there.
You can't prove the teacup isn't there, because our instruments are not sophisticated enough to see it. An "A-teacupist" would lack belief in the teacup. But, since he can't disprove it, the "A-teacupist" position isn't viable. So, the only other alternative is to be a "Teacupist," i.e., one that professes belief in the teacup.
This is exactly what the "viability" page tells you. If you accept that this page is true, you must profess to any belief, no matter how absurd, that you can't disprove, or you're holding a position that isn't viable.
If this simply, obvious misunderstanding of logic and proof escapes them, then I'll head back to the site when I want a good laugh. They've demonstrated their brain power enough for today.
2007-05-01 12:08:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by jtrusnik 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I say when a religious group puts up a website about a different religious group... it's sketchy at best. Usually the intentions are to disprove said religion (in this case non-religion) by any means necessary. Truths are rarely used, things are taken out of context, and things are mistakenly interpreted on purpose, to lead people away from said religion and towards their own.
It's alot like ABC hosting a website about CBS. It's bound to be rotten.
2007-05-01 12:02:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by hayaa_bi_taqwa 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
My spouse and that i have been having anal sex on and rancid for over 12 months. sure, she has suggested that the shade, of bowels change, and she has complained of the runs. besides the indisputable fact that, diverse simptoms every time. also, a majority of those human beings speaking about dropping the ability of the anus by the years because of anal sex. I gues none of you've a bowel stream. Your anus is streched for the time of a bowel stream, and over the existence of someone it will be streched without or with you approvel. Anal sex if positive carefully. i'd not propose it wide-spread, yet i might want to say it will be an something carried out contained in the bedroom only for something else to do.
2016-12-05 04:51:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by cynthy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It says atheism is a cult!
LMAO!!!
I agree - class A tripe. I liked how the writer attempted to justify being judgmental by qualifying how he too "stopped believing for a while". I'll have to go back and look at the author's info some more. Too funny.
2007-05-01 12:03:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by ReeRee 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Looks like a pamphlet I was handed on the metro a few weeks ago...
If reasoning is flawed, then thinking is flawed, and we simply cannot know...This does not mean we should resort to guessing or hoping.
2007-05-01 12:01:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Eleventy 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
right here:
"Atheism is, essentially, a negative position."
they lost me. it was fine up to some point... but labeling is not the best idea.
and this:
"At least we Christians have evidences for God's existence such as fulfilled biblical prophecy, Jesus' resurrection, the Transcendental Argument, the entropy problem, etc."
is just THE funniest thing ive read today.
2007-05-01 12:01:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Loathing 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Right away I see a problem:
Most atheists claim they "lack belief in gods". In other words, they are saying that they have no position, take no intellectual action, have no belief or unbelief on the matter concerning God. To them it is a non-issue.
*BUZZ* False. It's not a non-issue. Lacking belief doesn't necessarily indicate a lack of interest in the subject.
2007-05-01 12:03:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by ZER0 C00L ••AM••VT•• 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
That site is a joke. "Exposing the flawed Reasoning and Logic of Atheism - by using even more Flawed reasoning and logic!"
2007-05-01 12:01:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 5
·
6⤊
0⤋