The Bible is a hypothetical by denotative definition. The "Creationism Theory" is based on the Words of the Bible.
A Theory may not rest on the proof of a Hypotheses' words.
2007-05-01 09:34:48 · 9 answers · asked by Terry 7 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
"Creation Theory", or the "Theory of Intelligent Design" are not scientific theories at all. A scientific theory must be testable through observation or prediction and thus, falsifiable. To date, no Creationist or scientist has offered a logical means to accomplish this.
Also, a scientific theory is accepted by the scientific community as a general truth (many fail to understand this) because it is backed by observable evidence.
"Creation Theory" isn't based in science. It's based on faith. "Creation Theory" also fails as a scientific hypothesis because it's not based on inductive reasoning.
So a hypothesis, based on inductive reason, may become a theory once testable and falsifiable evidence is presented that will support it.
2007-05-01 09:54:35 · answer #1 · answered by Dog 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i'm a Christian, We call it a concept because it really is official identify is 'the theory of Evolution'. A hypothesis is an recommended wager of what's going to take position with the help of then end of an attempt, or something for that count number. you're accusing Christians of using the incorrect time period, at the same time as in actuality you're contained in the incorrect. As for you questioning that we are unaware of the words concept and hypothesis, that is our conception equipment that God placed all creatures in this earth. i'm no longer saying that i do no longer have self belief in evolution, that is between the recommendations we may be able to describe how purely Galapagos Iguanas can bypass on water, at the same time as all of the different species of iguanas are constrained to land. you're saying that the Christian would not recognize what they say, at the same time as in reality, they recognize precisely what they're speaking about. you're the only which would not recognize what they're speaking about.
2016-11-23 20:50:09 · answer #2 · answered by voll 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
From a scientific definition of a theory you can't.
There is more than one definition of the word theory. The dictionary says it can just be an idea. But by no means is that a Scientific theory.
2007-05-01 09:42:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ive not heard of "Creationism Theory." Only of "Creation Science"... Either way, neither involve any kind of science at all.
2007-05-01 09:40:12 · answer #4 · answered by ? 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hey now. You stay in your backyard and I'll stay in mine-no need to be tearing down fences unless you have a search warrant.
2007-05-01 09:40:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
HUH? I just know that the story is comical. Genesis disproves Genesis. Cain went to Nod where he found a wife.
2007-05-01 09:38:24 · answer #6 · answered by Gorgeoustxwoman2013 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
By connotative definition it's called faith. It doesn't need to rest on any other source for it's validation.
2007-05-01 09:38:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I don't know b/c your question is a false postulate due to the fact that you didn't spell 'separate' correctly.
2007-05-01 09:39:11 · answer #8 · answered by stevijan 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Good point.
2007-05-01 09:39:18 · answer #9 · answered by Dharma Nature 7 · 0⤊ 4⤋