Doesn't a miracle prove He exists? If He is willing to prove He exists, why do you say He won't do anything to prove He exists?
Why was God willing to prove He exists to Adam, to Noah, to Abbraham, to David, to Solomon, to all those who witnessed the parting of the Red Sea, to all those who witnessed the birth of Jesus, to all those who witnessed the baptism of Jesus, to all those who were fed with the loaves and the fish, to those who saw Jesus walk on water and calm the tempest, to those who witnessed the ressurected Christ, to Paul on the road to Damascus?
Why does God have so many exceptions to His rule of not providing proof of His existence?
2007-05-01 06:16:24 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
There's no reason, in theory, why god's presence couldn't be measured or detected in some way. The only reason that believers claim that god "can't" be detected in this way is because god *isn't* detected, and so a vast and intricate rationale has to be devised to explain this vast, loving, eternal, all-powerful "something" which is, in every external, objective respect, indistinguishable from nothing.
2007-05-01 06:20:40 · answer #1 · answered by KryptonOne 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the burden of information is on the ingredient of the claimant, to that end people who declare that god is authentic. there are various proofs that god does not exist (a minimum of interior the way he's defined). we could make this easy, with a undemanding occasion... have you ever had a bad day? the place issues could have long gone greater constructive yet did not? nicely, if god existed as he's often portrayed (stable, all powerfull and all understanding) then he could supply you somewhat push interior the the final option course, or have something stable pass your way so as which you had an greater handy time, so as that issues could be greater handy and greater constructive (regardless of each and every thing its often prevalent as something stable to help somebody else, in the event that they have the flexibility and the understanding to take action). the undeniable fact that that did not take place ability certainly one of four issues, the two god isn't stable through fact he could have helped, yet did not (then he does not need to be refered to has "god" for he fails between the standards) or he did not be responsive to (Then he's not all-understanding, so why call him god?) or he could not do something approximately it (...i concept he became into meant to be all efficient...) Or he does not exist (which might clarify why issues do not pass your way perpetually). In any of those circumstances he the two does not exist, or does not need to be reffered to as god through loss of qualifications.
2016-10-14 06:35:27 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its like some starlet who's had major plastic surgery but denies it to the media and insists that its all natural... only to have pieces of the surgery collapse during a public event..... The signs are obvious but the Starlet thinks by denial or distraction tactics that the world's people would be fooled when they are definitely not....
2007-05-01 06:21:35 · answer #3 · answered by Padma 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sorry, these people already had faith. And those who didn't (in Jesus time) did not believe even after seeing Jesus perform miracles.
We have the Bible. It all comes down to believing or not. Like in Jesus' time, you could chose not to believe even if you saw a miracle.
2007-05-01 06:20:16 · answer #4 · answered by Gui 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Lots of heads are exploding at this very moment.
I suspect you'll see the "gobbledy-****" strategy in the responses you get. You know,
"God isn't in our plane of existence so it is not ours to look for proof while he performs his great works and insert other mysterious-sounding nonsense here while you ignore the utter irrationality of it all because you simply assume that it must be true so insult others and call it all a matter of ignorance"
2007-05-01 06:18:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
The problem is that what they count as "miracles" are simple, common, everyday occurences.
Sunrises, sunsets, the birth of a child. All these common things that are WELL understood by science, they claim to be "miracles".
Pretty poor examples of miracles if you ask me...
2007-05-01 06:20:24 · answer #6 · answered by Yoda Green 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
"Why does God have so many exceptions to His rule of not providing proof of His existence?"
Or better still, why does this god, who knows everything, not do what he knows he must to make people know he's there?
2007-05-01 06:20:10 · answer #7 · answered by LabGrrl 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Why don't you ask God yourself?
We don't make the rules..... but here is another rule: if you don't accept Jesus Christ as your Savior, you will burn in hell forever....
That, my friend, is a very, very long time....
2007-05-01 06:22:37 · answer #8 · answered by me m 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Even today he supposedly cures sick people, saves other from disasters, etc., but nothing substantial
Why not ??
2007-05-01 06:20:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Read my blog about miracles...just wrote it this morning
2007-05-01 06:20:34 · answer #10 · answered by jeffwilliams1979 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋