to attend schools in this country. We the taxpayers are paying for this also.
2007-05-01 04:41:30 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
What really pisses me off about this (my kids go to an overcrowded school where the parents have to pay for PE and music and media class or there would be none) is that WE can't even go to the 'better school' up the road. WE have our addresses checked - I had to bring escrow papers when I enrolled my kids in school to prove where I lived. But it's 'ok' for them to come, overcrowd our schools, impose us with their costs of education, and we are supposed to accept that.
2007-05-01 04:56:32 · answer #1 · answered by DAR 7 · 4⤊ 4⤋
i imagine he's not i'm particular he will could have an evidence. perchance, that previous structure isn't valid any extra!!! yet wait would not the President take an oath to uphold it? the position IS BUSH in this? he's the only to be putting his foot down! yet to boot it really is yet another marvelous shame, not for Barack, he's a swell guy, yet FOR THE DEMOCRATS AND THE MEDIA. Why do I nonetheless use the the be conscious and? sure, that is hostile to the structure for Barack to also be President... So that is back to Hillary or Biden? v. McCain i'd not call it a criminal offense, merely that Mr. Obama did not comprehend and no man or woman instructed him, merely upload it to the different 14 causes i won't be able to vote Obama. yet i imagine (like Hillary) he can proceed to serve our us of a contained in the Senate until eventually, he must be President of Indonesia? he's a citizen of that us of a apparently.
2016-12-05 04:15:10 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did you know that there's no such thing as an 'illegal Mexican.'
You're trying to say that "Mexican children are crossing the border /illegally/." Sorry, but if we nativists are going to stand up for our language and culture, we can at least get the former right, ourselves.
I assume that what's happening is that whole families are crossing the border, and, are sending thier kids to whatever local schools they can get them into. Would it be better to leave the kids behind, or give them no education at all? (I know: it'd be better not to break the law and enter the US in the first place.)
2007-05-01 04:48:17 · answer #3 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 3⤊ 5⤋
Yes, I saw that on Fox News. What really got my goat was one side, said it was the responsible of the border guards to figure out which students were crossing illegally. Here we go again passing the buck back to the Feds, who has no interest in enforcing our laws. The school board still has to make sure that the children in the system belong there. These may be USA citizens, but they live in Mexico not in the school district and once again Mexico is pulling a fast one one us.
2007-05-01 04:44:30 · answer #4 · answered by jean 7 · 3⤊ 5⤋
Yes, and obviously, we citizens aren't speaking loudly enough. We need to unite and demand law enforcement and deportation of all illegal immigrants. We have to start reporting all illegals and all employers who hire, harbor and help them and we need to start riding herd on our government letting them know that we don't want one penny of our tax dollars supporting groups like La Raza, LULAC, MALDEF, ICIRR etc. If we citizens become as vocal as the illegal and illegal support groups and we actually stop attending churches that support them and stop financing the church synods that support illegal immigration, we'll make some huge headway. Additionally, if we start our own companies in the USA and when arrested if we claim unequal treatment under the law and have our attorneys give examples of how illegal immigrants and their supporters are given a pass, they'll get so frustrated that they'll have to start uniform enforcement.
2007-05-01 04:49:59 · answer #5 · answered by MH/Citizens Protecting Rights! 5 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Of course. Are you surprised? Wow, taxpayers pay for all kinds of welfare. And for your information, many school systems in this country have to hire bi-linguals to teach, thus costing more. If they do not hire bi-linguals, the build segregated ones, costing even more. Remember, every paycheck you earn, about %10 goes to these kind of funds.
2007-05-01 04:48:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
I can believe it. Its about time Mexico sorted itself out. If they spent more time and money on society and less on being corrupt they may get somewhere. Until then, I am all in favor of a wall and more stringent methods if necessary to keep illegals out.
And to Love Me, we have to pay high taxes to pay for the criminals who live of us. If they were kept out our taxes would go down. We have a right and pay to be here. The illegals have no right and do not pay, just act like the parasites they are.
2007-05-01 04:45:12 · answer #7 · answered by Elizabeth Howard 6 · 5⤊ 3⤋
No free school, no ssn,no lisense,
check every thing through ICE, Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Jail for hiring illegals
renting to illegals
and selling property to illegals
English as a second Language classes yes.
If they only speak spanish when they get to kindergarten they are 5 years behind already.
Bi lingual no.
2007-05-01 05:10:00 · answer #8 · answered by FOA 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
I know and it's not fair. So many Americans are going to private school to get away from them. They are depleting the resources and slowing down education because they don't speak English well.
2007-05-01 04:48:52 · answer #9 · answered by Calista 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
"Illegal Mexican children"? Crossing the border illegally doesn't make them "illegal children".
No human being is illegal.
2007-05-01 04:52:29 · answer #10 · answered by Elly 5 · 7⤊ 4⤋