2007-05-01 04:03:47 · 34 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
They have the right to be deported, and if they have children that are US citizens they have the right to take their children with them and start the process of returning to the US legally
2007-05-02 01:40:00 · answer #1 · answered by deedee2qu 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Criminal trespass is different from entering the country illegally, but, as with any crime, even illegal aliens have rights - that's why they are sometimes deported rather than charged with any other crimes they may have committed - because it's easier to get them out of the country than to convict them in the US.
2007-05-01 04:23:00 · answer #2 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I see all of the answer such as the constitution and then I remember the line bring me your hungry and tired and I will
shelter you. The constitution is a set of rules for the government and it jurisdiction, these things are for American citizens not illegal immigrants.
The problem is the term "illegal" My wife is a foreign national and we are taking the legal route to get her here. IT is a long process and but it is worth it. She then will have the rights we hold dear but if we go to any other country they will not treat us as they would treat their own so why should we show the same courtesy. And if they treat ours with the same respect we should show the same. Mexico police are notorious for holding Americans to get an income for a small infraction where as they overlook it with many of their own citizens.
2007-05-01 04:51:32 · answer #3 · answered by gregamazoo 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Illegal aliens are going into the US (or any country) illegally.
The only right they have is to be treated humanely as they await deportation.
As a Mexican citizen, (and contrary to what many people think) I am totally AGAINST people going into the US illegally.
2007-05-01 04:33:48 · answer #4 · answered by BEL76 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism. When I refer to hyphenated Americans, I do not refer to naturalized Americans. Some of the very best Americans I have ever known were naturalized Americans, Americans born abroad. But a hyphenated American is not an American at all.
This is just as true of the man who puts “native” before the hyphen as of the man who puts German or Irish or English or French before the hyphen. Americanism is a matter of the spirit and of the soul. Our allegiance must be purely to the United States. We must unsparingly condemn any man who holds any other allegiance.
But if he is heartily and singly loyal to this Republic, then no matter where he was born, he is just as good an American as any one else.
The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing to be a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities, an intricate knot of German-Americans, Irish-Americans, English- Americans, French-Americans, Scandinavian- Americans, or Italian-Americans, each preserving its separate nationality, each at heart feeling more sympathy with Europeans of that nationality than with the other citizens of the American Republic.
The men who do not become Americans and nothing else are hyphenated Americans; and there ought to be no room for them in this country. The man who calls himself an American citizen and who yet shows by his actions that he is primarily the citizen of a foreign land, plays a thoroughly mischievous part in the life of our body politic. He has no place here; and the sooner he returns to the land to which he feels his real heart-allegiance, the better it will be for every good American.
Addressing the Knights of Columbus in New York City
12 October 1915
2007-05-01 04:14:14 · answer #5 · answered by congressmankickass 1 · 4⤊ 0⤋
unlawful immigration motives many issues that's for optimistic. that's an undemanding actuality. Given your estimate of 20 million illegals permit's proceed from there. permit's say even a million/3 of them are conserving jobs. that's basically approximately 7 million human beings interior the paintings tension. Contributing to the tax base etc. that could desire to pass away 7 million interest vacancies. could our usa be able to shelter that many leaving the paintings tension? possibly not. could individuals step into those jobs for the pay presented? possibly not. agencies final analysis is income. could they improve wages to get individuals to paintings those jobs? possibly not. greater agencies could start to outsource. subsequently leaving many individuals out of jobs that now carry jobs. Our entire usa could give way and the super melancholy could appear as if a cakewalk. As i've got pronounced unlawful immigration is faulty and needs to end. yet we additionally could desire to be sensible on deporting as you're saying 20 million human beings. have faith me...it could not take place for countless motives. So we could desire to flow forward and picture of sensible a thank you to handle the situation to hand and likewise insure the unlawful difficulty is stemmed interior the destiny. greater constructive border protection and visa structures could desire to be taken care of first and maximum nicely known so the situation does not gradually worsen. as quickly as the flow is stopped we are able to then paintings on what to do with those already right here.
2016-10-14 06:22:57 · answer #6 · answered by Erika 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Criminal trespass is a crime,they should have no more rights than anyone else who has been convicted of the same crime as the law goes.
After their punishment they should be deported.
2007-05-01 04:33:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The right to be treated humanely and fairly as they are being deported.
The Constitution,Bill of Rights and all other American documents are for and about Legal Americans. Not illegal aliens.
The United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights states in Article 13, line 2:
"Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country."
Article 13 does not provide the right for any global citizen to illegally enter any host nation they so choose. Yet human rights and morality advocates vociferously claim such a right, obviously without justification as such a right is not provided in the widely accepted human rights declaration.
2007-05-01 04:22:41 · answer #8 · answered by Yakuza 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Basic human rights, not much more. The right to be fed and be allowed to use the bathroom if the bus to take them to the border takes a while.
2007-05-01 04:11:44 · answer #9 · answered by sandsunsurf 3 · 6⤊ 0⤋
The right to a one way bus trip back across the border.
2007-05-01 11:43:45 · answer #10 · answered by Mother 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋