English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-05-01 04:02:22 · 35 answers · asked by Chimera's Song 6 in Food & Drink Other - Food & Drink

35 answers

I'm with you on that.

My brother brought some back from New York.
I think they must make it out of sour milk or crap or something.

Give me Cadbury's any time.

2007-05-01 04:07:20 · answer #1 · answered by Kitty Dangleberry 4 · 4 2

Put the question in proper perspective. Hershey marketed chocolate at a time when the common man couldn't afford to buy chocolate. Hershey sold chocolate for a nickel, amassing a fortune on pennies that are used today to help people in need.

Granted Hershey can't compare to the finer chocolates, but it is affordable to everyone. It's a trade off where you choose the qualities that are important to you.

2007-05-01 04:14:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

False - It's true the premium brands from the U.S., Germany and Belgium taste better than Hershey but that's because they don't have nearly the distribution or low cost of Hershey. For a relatively cheap mass produced piece of chocolate I have yet to taste anything better than Hershey.

2007-05-01 04:21:54 · answer #3 · answered by Marty123456 2 · 1 1

Absolutely true - after years of reading american comics & seeing all the ads for chocolate I finally had my first Hershey bar at a diner on the Big Sur in California - as dissapointing as my first sexual encounter but nowhere near as sweet!!!

2007-05-01 08:37:45 · answer #4 · answered by Arthur R 3 · 1 0

False!!! I like the Hershey's with almonds
and I like the big bar of dark chocolate ... also the plain powder for cooking is good ...

2007-05-01 04:12:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Hershey's isn't as disgusting as something even cheaper, like Palmer's chocolate. But really, I won't eat anything less than 60% cocoa.

2007-05-01 07:55:26 · answer #6 · answered by Cass M 4 · 0 0

Hershey's milk chocolate is yummy! I don't like the Special Dark though.

2007-05-01 06:15:12 · answer #7 · answered by brevejunkie 7 · 0 0

that is all relative.to some volume it really is honest, yet i imagine that has been a debate considering that centuries. in my opinion i believe that the purposes of the numerous trump the purposes of the few, on the opportunity of sounding too very resembling a well known man or woman trek fan. So perchance each little thing is honest in conflict and under no circumstances love, in case your love is constrained to at least one man or woman. If we bypass through the announcing of needs of many being better, then obviously it really is valid contained in the context of wars! . yet now we are going to get into the argument that wars are brutal and great and ought to not happen! So lets infer, that no, each little thing isn't fairi n love and in conflict, strictly speaking in words of morality and good judgment.

2016-12-05 04:13:19 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

True true true. The first time I fly by myself it was to America, so on the way back I stocked up on loads and loads of candy at the airport and most of it was VILE with Hershey being the worst offender. Urgh! And what is with 'grape' flavour sweets that taste like cleaning fluid?

2007-05-01 04:15:14 · answer #9 · answered by tigerfly 4 · 1 1

True. Have you ever read the contents of a hershey bar? There's everything under the sink except cocoa. lol

2007-05-01 04:09:36 · answer #10 · answered by beanie 5 · 2 1

Totally false, tastes and smells like real chocolate.

Example: a Krackel Bar smell and tastes like a luscious chocolate bar with crisped rice. a Nestle Cruch smells and tastes like chocolate covered chemical additives.

2007-05-01 04:09:55 · answer #11 · answered by Icewomanblockstheshot 6 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers