Are male-female seggregated societies unnatural/ oppressive or are heterosexual ones?

Question

In mammals the original lifestyle consists of totally seggregated male and female spaces as represented by one of the oldest mammals ----- the elephants.

Mammals have no social pressures to do so. Males and females instinctively prefer that.

It is the same-sex sexual bonds that keep these male-only/ female only spaces strong and livable.

However, some males (around 5%) are exclusively 'heterosexual' (sic) & they need to live with females. Since they can't they become loners (as in elephants).

But, in species (such as horses or lions) where the females become weak (due to weakened same-sex bonds) these 5% males + 7% to 10% others who are predominantly so-called 'heterosexual', control these female spaces as harems.

That's the only heterosexual space that we know of in the natural mammalian setting (including tribal humans).

Males, especially love and need their male-only spaces. Destroying these spaces by heterosexualising them is the bigggest but unacknowledged....

.....and thus invisible oppression of men.

Heterosexual human social spaces are the root of all major social problems including the visible oppression of woemn and the invisible oppression of men.

E.g. when a male is forced (by psycho-social pressures) to marry and live with a woman, which is against the core of his nature, he may take out his frustration on the woman through violence (because she's weak physically).

Male spaces ------ whether in humans or animals can be heterosexualised only after males have been sufficiently weakened/ demasculated by breaking them from each other ------ as in the west.

Heterosexual spaces are unnatural and oppressive both for men and women, but in the present situation, especially for men.

What do you think?

Those who reply without reading, their answers do not count

Answer 1

Simple put in the animal kingdom there can only be one purpose and thats the gaurentee passing of your own hertiage, your own genetic code. Us humans on the other hand having proven time and time again that well give our own lives to save other peoples hertiage, even other people genetic code, if anything just for our own moral "salvation". With this said we can't be simply seen as animals. Thats the bigest debate around and helps to widen the split between science and religion. Lets face it thou were animal in the core, our hearts. But this brain we've got is in no way compariable to any other animal out there. No it doesn't make us better then animals, no more then a bird who can fly is more animal then a rat that can crawl. but it does in a certian sense give us a power that no animal has. Thats simple put the ability to go aganist our instincts, to fight our own nature, to actual show and demistrate "Free Will" as they call it, darn church. Ether way this brecks natural bonds, we can easily be happy in almost any circumstance as long as atleast some of our needs our meet. And in other cases feel like were in heck when every wish and want has been met. This makes us so gosh darn complicated to make any one defining answer to any social problem unreachable. For the reason I've just stated we are all individuals. I've some woman to actual me more masculite then some man and visa versa. All this demistrates is that sexual roles, are just that roles, predetermied by society/culture, Weather we would instinctual go that way isn't the point because humans unlike most pack animals have a force of legacy outside themselves, namly culture. And its the culture which is oppression us not just the roles, but the entire system past down from father to son has perversed past its simple intended purpose due to the fact that our understanding of the world has change completely since them. Now I could go on to say also that a person inablility to form geniune strong relationships with any sex shows also a personal problem which forces them to generilize there view of the opposite sex not based so much on facts, but someones own personal fear. It isn't because man and woman are so different thats caused marriage to become oppressive, its because society says that marriage is seen this way, that makes it so oppressive. We as humans can love the situation or hate it, it isn't about instincts or nature, its about our own darn brains getting twisted by our gosh darn culture, darn you mom and dad!!! But again nice point!!! Really it does show why most men feel oppressed, but again you don't give credit to humans ability to paint his own perception of life. So people would call that oppression, their own personal kingdom, and some wouldn't even give it a chance. But your a smart cookie thats for sure!