1 being not dangerous at all, 10 being are you bloody crazy??
2007-04-30 20:46:11 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Cars & Transportation ➔ Safety
0-no danger at all, try it on a push bike, blindfolded, wearing a tinsel bikini.
then you're talking at least 4..
2007-04-30 20:58:28 · answer #1 · answered by jabberwocky 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
definately just a 1. assuming it is 3 feet wide, which is the worse of the two options.
Only thing to make sure of is that your car is not leaking fuel, specially if it is an LPG, CNG powered one. For petrol or diesol, I wouldnt even bother checking.
back of envelope type calculation suggests that at 50mph you will take 0.04 seconds to travel through the fire. Not a long time for anything to even slightly warm up.
Further traveling at that speed the car will be pushing a considerable cushion of air in front of it, under and on all sides. So unless the fire is well set the main danger is that it will be blown out! (poor fire) The flames will not even touch the car.
2007-04-30 23:05:36 · answer #2 · answered by Walaka F 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
It depends on what level of danger is represented by the scale. If 1 is staying in bed and 10 is juggling flaming chainsaws while balancing on the back of a hungry Great White shark in a swimming pool in Bagdad singing 'I'm a yankie-doodle dandy' then I'd place it at about a 6.
2007-04-30 20:50:44 · answer #3 · answered by The Wandering Blade 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is better drive your car through 50 foot wall of fire at 3 mph.
2007-04-30 20:50:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
About 5 for a petrol car, 3 for diesel, 6 for LPG or CNG unless the gas tank is inside the car's body (e.g. in the boot), in which case it will be the same as a petrol car.
Diesel is much harder to ignite than the other fuels.
2007-04-30 21:39:14 · answer #5 · answered by Neil 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It depends what you are driving - an open top car you'd better duck.
If it is a normal hatchback/sedan
2. You will pass through the flame before you notice.
2007-05-01 09:25:23 · answer #6 · answered by shell 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
6. does not rather rely to me in the event that they look sturdy or no longer, yet they might desire to in good condition my tastes. This guy I liked replaced into called grotesque via each physique simply by fact he had furry eyebrows and a few zits. yet he replaced into the main sturdy-looking guy to me in my severe college. What i actually liked approximately him in spite of the indisputable fact that replaced into his character. seems got here afterwards.
2016-10-04 04:37:56 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is the wall of fire three foot high or thick?
2007-04-30 20:53:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ooh, I'd guess about an 8
Don't fancy it myself though
Not without a full outfit of fit firemen ...
2007-04-30 20:53:48 · answer #9 · answered by Dogsbody 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends upon what the wall is made of.
2007-05-01 02:54:38 · answer #10 · answered by Bostonian In MO 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋