why iran have strongest weapons?

Answer 1

Iran does not have better "weapons".

However they have been able to keep a lot of thier structure secret. They are much more capable then the Iraqi forces and better organized.

If you watch and believe history repeats itself, the Iranian President dreams of the destruction of Israel and the United States. He makes open threat's that if put in action he would become the Hitler of our century.

The United States has the most capable Military on this planet. From the soldiers to the weapon's, Land Air or Sea we can dominate.

You may use the Iraqi "war" as an example to claim otherwise however you must understand one thing.

We crushed the Iraqi military with ease. The M1A2 Abrams tanks were picking of the obsolete Iraqi tanks before they could fire back. We occupied that country like we owned it.

It is no longer a war by definition. It is now a peace keeping mission. We are trying to stabilize the country so it can support itself and controll its own security.


Iran is no walk in the park however if it ever goes toe to toe with the ALLIES it will be dropped to its knee's.

To the guy below who thinks we dont have the best weapons, I suggest looking at the F-22 Raptor that is Generations ahead of its time.

Thats just one example.

Answer 2

The most lethal weapon Iran, Iraq, or any other Middle Eastern nation has is disunity. Disunitty in America.

The foundation of the United States was built upon unity: United we Stand, Divided We Fall. Unfortunately, through weak immigration laws, the United States' desire to be the country that solves other country's internal problems, and the audacious belief by Americans that the United States "way of life" is the only way to live, America is "at risk:, struggling to perpetuate a government that may be obsolete.

The strongest weapon against America may be the inner turmoil: taxes, ineffective education, lack of the judicial society to stand up for the ordinary citizen. Lawyers "plea out" murderers, sex offenders, rapists, just to "clear their calendars" so they can get to their country club.

Answer 3

it fairly is strictly the 1st element coming to the ideas of any clever individual international on a similar time as listening to that.... the completed Mr.Ahmadinejad's asserting is (the belief, no longer the staggering words): why usa's government thinks it has the staggering to intervene with different international places' affairs on a similar time as itself is the single that could desire to be tried in courts for such particularly some crimes it has performed international so a techniques.... in spite of the shown fact that, Iran does not have and is not any longer making plans to have Nuclear weapons. by using fact having (and employing) such weapons which kills lots of harmless human beings is against actual Islam....

Answer 4

Just like to point out that Iran has the 8th Largest Military in the World.

If activate in total war (without conscription) the US could boast 2.3 Million. Iran could bring a force of 12.2 million.

Please don't go to war with them, cause then Australia would follow.

Answer 5

We do not have the strongest weapons for sure
But we have the strongest heart that is much more usable in wars thats the point.

Answer 6

WHo said they have weapons??? CNN, FOX NEWS??? That's what they said about Iraq, all they found was a 3rd world country that runs of gas generators that can't even build a decent sewage system. YEs...they are REALLY threatening my FREEDOM, so let's kill 'em right? COME ON>>>

Answer 7

They don't have nukes yet.. and their conventional forces can't compare with the US.

They're picking a fight they're going to have a hard time winning.

Answer 8

Because Ronald Reagan gave them to the Iranians!

And How, it is us who is picking the fight, and I wouldn't say they could not beat us. Hell, even the Iraqi civilians can do that!

Answer 9

Iran may have plans to expand its power in the Middle East - to have a Shiite caliphate from Iran, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon. It is unlikely, however, that Iran would use a nuclear bomb against Israel to "wipe it from the map" (which Iranian President Ahmadi-nejad said paraphrasing Ayatollah Khomenei). Iran needs the bomb to insure that no country will challenge it.

With the "industrial scale" enrichment of uranium using at least 3,000 centrifuges, Iran could have enough material for several atomic warheads.

In defiance of the UNSC and the IAEA, Iran not only continues to enrich uranium but has gone from 3 arrays of 164 (P-1 slow) centrifuges to 18 arrays of (P-2 fast) centrifuges (=2952) in its underground facilty at Natantz. The facility was built to hold up to 60,000 centrifuges.

ISIS was skeptical of the Natanz FEP (fuel enrichment plant) being fully operational with 3,000 centrifuges by May 2007 to produce HEU which could be combined with the plutonium production at the "heavy water" facility at Arak and make a nuclear weapon.

Iran's President Mahmoud Admadi-Nejad announced on Monday, April 9, 2007 that the Natantz FEP plant had indeed installed the 3,000 centrifuges as was enriching uranium on an "industrial scale". This is in defiance of the UNSC expanded sanctions imposed on March 24, 2007. Leading Iranian nuclear negotiator, Ali Larijani, indicated that Iran would quit the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty rather than comply with the demands of the IAEA. Iran's top nuclear negotiator, Ali Larijani announced, "The Islamic republic of Iran has installed 3,000 centrifuges and begun feeding them with uranium hexafluoride gas."

Furthermore, in defiance of the UNSC travel ban, Gen. Mohammad Baqer Zolqadr, an Iranian Revolutionary Guard general, made a 6-day trip to Russian boasted his trip showed "the ineffectiveness of the resolution."
http://www.debka.com/headline.php?hid=4045
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6538957.stm

In the enrichment process, uranium hexafluoride gas is pumped into centrifuges, which spin and purify the gas. Enriched to a low degree, the result is fuel for a reactor, but to a high degree it creates the material for a nuclear warhead. The aim of enrichment is to increase the proportion of fissile uranium-235 atoms within uranium. The slightly denser isotope u-238 (see depleted uranium) is separate from the lighter u-235 (fissile uranium).
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/sci_nat/05/nuclear_fuel/html/enrichment.stm

The head of the Iranian Nuclear Energy Organization, Gholam-Reza Aghazadeh, explains it thus:
The simple way is to inject 0.7% (uranium) and obtain 3.5%, right? Now, if you take this 3.5% and inject it again into the chain (of centrifuges), the result will be 20%. If you inject the 20% back into the chain, the result will be 60%. If you inject this 60%, the result will be 90%.
http://www.memritv.org/Transcript.asp?P1=1120

On Tuesday, April 10, 2007 Head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI) Reza Aqazadeh said that "industrial scale enrichment" means Iran is proceeding to install and operate the complete array of 50,000 centrifuges for maximum capacity of uranium enrichment.
http://www2.irna.ir/en/news/view/line-24/0704102262112737.htm

Iran's key nuclear sites.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4617398.stm

The Isfahan plant is above ground, but Natanz is more than 50ft below and would require either a tactical nuclear missile or a conventional bunker-buster bomb to destroy it.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/iran/story/0,,1753223,00.html.

Iran's Shahab-3 ballistic missiles are capable of carrying a nuclear warhead and can be detonated by a remote-control device while still in high-altitude flight as electromagnetic pulse weapons - even one of which could knock out America's critical electrical and technological infrastructure, effectively sending the continental U.S. back to the 19th century with a recovery time of months or years. Iran will have that capability – at least theoretically – as soon as it has one nuclear bomb ready to arm such a missile
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=43956

Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki attended a regional conference on Iraq in Egypt on Thursday. After taking his seat across the table from U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, he excused himself from the table saying that the violinist was inapropriately dressed.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/04/iraq/main2760338.shtml

The United Nations has imposed two sets of sanctions on Iran since December over its refusal to freeze enrichment -- a process that can be used to make atomic warheads. Ali Larijani made it clear to EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana in Ankara that Iran had no intention of suspending uranium enrichment.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/03/AR2007050300625.html
.
.

Answer 10

Why you speak jibberish? oy vay