Basically, have the plane break into sections and have huge parachutes to easily take the pilots and passengers to safety.
I got this idea after seeing tanks being dropped from airplanes with parachutes. So it could be done.
2007-04-30
18:59:29
·
10 answers
·
asked by
Cracker
1
in
Cars & Transportation
➔ Aircraft
It would be like a bigger ejection capsule. Like no wings or tail, which also would parachute to safety.
2007-04-30
19:14:26 ·
update #1
Great idea but your to late. Cirrus has been using parachutes for years and is very success full. they have had several deployed and no major injuries. The older models caused sever damage to the aircraft but the newer SR22's only cause minor damage if the chute is deployed. Their are some other company's using chutes as well
2007-04-30 19:11:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If a plane became into going on, there does not be adequate time for all the passengers to line up, receive training approximately employing the parachute, then bounce out, separately, 10 to fifteen seconds aside. It does not take place. you will get 2 or 3 human beings out and then the plane could crash. a minimum of with the floatation gadgets, you have a raffle in case you land in water, stay to tell the story the crash, and make it out. The floatation gadget ought to maintain you afloat indefinitely (as long by using fact the water isn't too chilly and additionally you freeze to dying on a similar time as waiting for rescue ). yet once you're extremely in a plane crash, maximum probable you would be killed without delay, except the plane has basically taken off or is close to landing. If the plane falls from 36,000 feet, do no longer think of which you will probable make it out alive.
2016-10-14 05:55:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by bhuwan 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually no it wouldn't as by the time the plane is going down its to late to put on the chutes and start the skydiving.
When they do tanks they hit really hard and the drop was purposefully done from a safe height. If you were try to do this with the plane the chutes would be prohibitively large and hard to safely deploy in time. Plus the reduced fuel economy becouse of the extra weight would double your plane ticket. So if you think the average American is going to pay double for the privelage of the rectal exam you get from the TSA.
2007-04-30 19:06:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Some General Aviation have them and they make systems for most General Aviation aircrafts. They are just extremly expensive for your average joe.
If you talking about airliners we'll the idea is in play but for now, big Boeings and Airbuses move at such a fast speed( even during slow flight(130knt+)that when the parachutes deploy, they will get riped off or rip a peice of the airplane off.
2007-04-30 19:05:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Teerawood 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Unfortunately most crashes occur when the aircraft is taking off or landing thereby making a parachute or series of chutes useless. A chute requires altitude to deploy. On the other hand, too much altitude would suffocate you on the way down to breathable air.
2007-04-30 20:45:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by Zack 96745 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Its one of those things that has been well worked over and it is not feasible to do this .The Air Industry is at all times concentrating on making the planes safer and the pilots better so these things are not needed the aim is to have planes crash free.~~
2007-04-30 19:07:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by burning brightly 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
This system exists on one production aircraft (Cirrus) and is available for experimentals and ultralights. Look it up on the web.
2007-05-01 03:23:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by sky 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
And WTF do the plane chunks land? Most Air crashes are on take off or landing, how does the parachute work close to the ground?
2007-04-30 19:02:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Wow, you're a genius.
I'm sure aeronautical engineers have never explored that option before.
2007-04-30 19:06:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
interesting question. i think the planes would be going way too fast.
2007-04-30 19:04:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 2
·
0⤊
0⤋