2007-04-30 15:04:26 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Does it matter?
I was just wondering, myself -- if the matter doesn't matter, then what's the matter with the matter?
2007-04-30 15:06:50 · answer #1 · answered by me 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No
Science can only rearrange the already existent forms of matter.
This is rearrangement not new matter.
There is a subtle difference between energy and matter.
Science cannot unlock the key on the super subatomic level that separates energy from matter or locks energy into matter.
Let us call this the A/Ω, which the Creator is and holds.
Read this carefully mister science - theoretical and all is not matter - matter must be able to be in a state for an indefinite amount of time - not a theoretical micro nanosecond or what ever you want to make up to get research grants.
2007-04-30 22:07:18 · answer #2 · answered by cordsoforion 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Well it would pretty much go against the Law of Conservation of Mass which, stated most compactly, says "matter is neither creater nor destroyed". (After Albert Einstein's e=mc2 it became the law of conservation of mass-energy.)
So.... we'd have to really disprove some serious physics laws - Can man actually defy the nature of the universe? :)
2007-04-30 22:33:58 · answer #3 · answered by aali_and_harith 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
New matter, would imply new gravity. New gravity would be felt across the cosmos as gravity is constant accross the cosmos. Matter is not naturally created, it is converted from energy. That conversion allows gravity to remain stable.
Creativity is still the realm of Jesus.
2007-04-30 22:19:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
We can convert energy to matter now. You just need a high energy accelerator.
In theory, you could even produce positive energy as long as you produced an equal amount of negative gravitational potential energy to balance it. That is how we believe that inflation produced the matter/energy we observe today.
2007-04-30 22:07:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Science can't create in the true meaning of the word. What science can do is to transform energy. they can take one ingredient and transform it into something else, but they can't create the original ingredient.
2007-04-30 22:09:59 · answer #6 · answered by Sadhaka 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Energy and matter are just different forms of the same thing. So yes, but you would need a lot of energy. Science already has several processes that destroy matter.
Added: This has been done already - http://www.hep.princeton.edu/~mcdonald/physnews.337.htm
2007-04-30 22:07:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
I think so. The line between energy and matter is insignificant anyway.
2007-04-30 22:07:16 · answer #8 · answered by Songbird 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
science cannot create matter.
Science can alter matter, recombine matter, diversify matter, and modify matter, but cannot create,....... original pure matter.
Only that silly foolish guy upstairs was dotty enough to try to claim creation of the universe,...... through the creation of original matter.
God would be struggling, to fully decipher an atom,........ and as for creating the universe.
Forget it,......... he'd be out of his league,...... and far better off sticking to heaven and taking up harp lessons......
2007-04-30 22:10:24 · answer #9 · answered by peanut 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No. To create means to make something out of nothing. That is beyond what man can do.
2007-04-30 22:11:38 · answer #10 · answered by Southern Apostolic 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
By definition, it shouldn't be able to "create" anything but it may have a chance to convert energy into matter.
You ought to look up the basics of relativity as Einstein theorized it.
[][][] r u randy? [][][]
.
2007-04-30 22:08:24 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋