What would David Suzuki and Al Gore do it this documentary played over and over again on all TV channels?

Question

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4499562022478442170&hl=en

Answer 1

Use their political power to get it removed.

Answer 2

Split their sides laughing. Typical would be: "Hoo boy, the old "volcanoes" chestnut. What a joke."

"The science might be bunkum, the research discredited. But all that counts for Channel 4 is generating controversy."

http://environment.guardian.co.uk/climatechange/story/0,,2032572,00.html

The "swindle" movie is wrong. It is simply a political statement which distorts science. The director has a history of putting out misleading stuff. In 1997 he made a series for Channel 4 called “Against Nature”, which compared environmentalists with Nazis. Channel 4 had to apologise for the misleading stuff in that one. The present movie is also a distortion of the science. More here:

"A Channel 4 documentary claimed that climate change was a conspiratorial lie. But an analysis of the evidence it used shows the film was riddled with distortions and errors."

http://news.independent.co.uk/environment/climate_change/article2355956.ece

"Pure Propaganda"

http://www.medialens.org/alerts/07/0313pure_propaganda_the.php

Explanations of why the science is wrong.

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007/03/swindled/

History of the director.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Durkin_(television_director)

Gore's movie may be a little over dramatic, but it has the basic science right. This movie does not.

Channel 4 itself undercuts the movie in a funny way. If you go to their website on the movie you find links to real global warming information. They also say "Confused now? Ask the Expert.", with a link. The questions go to a respected mainstream scientist who supports (mostly) human responsibility for global warming.

Answer 3

heretics must be punished.

Carl Wunsch is also being punished. He is quoted as saying this about the great global warming swindle "climate change is "real, a major threat, and almost surely has a major human-induced component". Listen to this radio interview which air January 30, 2007 . Does this man sound like a person who supports the theory of man made global warming? Why the change in attitude? Is he being punished as a heretic? http://www.cjob.com/shows/adler.aspx?mc=62757