Evolution (vs) Creation ?

Question

and why you believe it,,Thanks

Answer 1

Fully aware of the knowledge of the total absurdity of evolution, most of our scientists of today still choose to accept its preposterous theories. Not only do they blindly follow after dead - end suppositions, but they have led the young minds of our world down those same paths. This is the greatest tragedy of all. Dr. George Wald, winner of the 1967 Nobel peace prize in science, wrote: "When it comes to the origin of life on this earth, there are only two possibilities: creation or spontaneous generation (evolution). There is no third way. Spontaneous generation was disproved 100 years ago, but that leads us only to one other conclusion: that of supernatural creation. We cannot accept that on philosophical grounds (personal reasons); therefore, we choose to believe the impossible: that life arose spontaneously by chance. "
"The fool hath said in his heart, there is no God."

(Psalm 14: 1)

1 - Geology
2 - Physics
3 - Mathematics
4 - Biology
5 - Anthropology
6 - Fossil Record

All scream that there is one.

May you look at the facts with an open mind and heart. If you do you will discover like so many have before that there is an omnipotent God; a God that wonderfully made you and loves you. He is a God that loves you so much that he gave his son to die for your sins that you may have eternal life. He made a way for you and I to live for an eternity; such a length of time that even an Evolutionist can't conceive of in his wildest dreams. This will prepare the hopes that you will use it to defend your faith in the Bible and the God of the Bible and that it will strengthen you and help you grow as a Christian. So I believe in creation

Answer 2

Both are based on faith. Creation is based on the premise that the Bible, as revealed truth describes the origin of life. There is a lot of evidence supporting many statements in the Bible, but as far as the origin of life is concerned, there is no evidence, one way or the other.

Evolution seems to me, to just be a way to explain creation without a creator. It is not based on science, because it has never been observed, repeated in a laboratory, and there is no way to disprove it, since the basic theory keeps changing.
If one were to accept the idea of a creator, no one would seriously entertain the idea of evolution. It depends on a continuous chain of virtually impossible favorable accidents, over millions of years. These are all supposed to be the results of natural forces. And yet, science is unable to duplicate any of them.

Recently, the term "micro evolution" has been used to validate evolution. In fact, there is no such thing as micro evolution. What is being called micro evolution is actually the survival of the fittest. Every species has variation. When some pathology begins to eradicate the species, the survivors become dominant. These survivors did not evolve resistance to the pathology. If they hadn't posessed it, they would have also been wiped out.

The surviving organizations now become the dominant form of the organism. No "micro evolution" has taken place. So, this certainly does not prove evolution.

Because both evolution and creation require faith, I find that creation requires less faith. The creation model doesn't have to keep changing every few years. The creation model doesn't have embarassing question like: where are all the transitional forms? how did organisims survive with organs or appandages that hadn't evolved enough to be functional? how did these unformed organs/appendages contribute to survivability?

Answer 3

I believe that there is a powerful entity created all life beings on earth...

Why I do believe it? Because I now realized that Evolution theory is wrong, clearly wrong.

1. Is it possible that 1 : 4^300000 probabilities of Human's DNA occurs only by chance?

2. What is the "missing link" between Animalia and Plantae? A Swamp Thing???

3. Why is there still living Coelacanth Fish? Shouldn't they all evolve to Amphibi?

4. If Abiogenesis occured a few billion years ago, why doesn't it happen again now?

5. Why are there so much "missing link"s why can't we got a solid continuum of evolution process.

6. Why there is no new species lately? A new species is defined by the number of cromosom and the length of DNA each cromosom. Why there are no new one since this late 2000 years or a DNA proof of a natural mutation.

7. If there's no fertile (radiated) mutants, even sex between the same 'new species" mutants do not produce any offspring. Then how can evolution as the chain of natural mutation due to adaptation process take place?

I was an atheist. Now I believe that He is.
I'm a graduate student in a reputable Institute of Technology

Answer 4

communicate origins is a really solid advent and promises a superior dissection of creationist claims and precisely why they are incorrect to boot as relating the info for evolution. the problem that you do not realize (and a serious element for a lot of human beings not accepting evolution) is that it does no in good structure smartly into the college room technological expertise attempt the position you could really reveal the idea, i.e. drop 2 diverse sized balls and observe that they hit the floor mutually. added, there is large quantities of analyze that has been performed, yet maximum of it has a tendency to be fairly good previous intense college degrees. Dawkin's cutting-edge e book "the finished instruct in the international" might want to be a superior reference. The hyperlinks decrease than might want to supplement others given to you. remember, you ought to examine the resources stated and double examine claims that are made. Be skeptical and objective and do not settle for something at face fee or merely because it sounds sensible.

Answer 5

Are you referring to "Evolution of Man"?

First, the Bible doesn't support evolution. Man was created by God in His own image.

Gen 1:26 - And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

If evolution is true, granting without accepting, and man came from ape, then why till date there is still ape, aren’t those ape subject to evolution also? There shouldn’t be any ape today if evolution is true,… unfortunately not!

Answer 6

Creation, of course. God created all things...that all things evolve is proof and evidence of the brilliance, creativity, and wisdom of the Supreme Creator.

Believing in evolution without creation is negating the existence of God. It is also an impossible proposition - how is it possible for something to evolve if it wasn't created in the first place?

Answer 7

The evidence for evolution is and has been interpreted from a Philosophical and ideological Bias, The answers given by adherents to Evolution here in R&S is proof of the bias and agenda, Atheism has to have an alternate explanation—other than a Creator—for how the universe and life came into existence.
Darwin once identified himself as a Christian but as a result of some tragedies that took place in his life, he later renounced the Christian faith and the existence of God. Evolution was invented by an atheist.
What is sad is that Christians are falling into this Trap and trying to fit evolution into the Bible (Theistic Evolution) thinking they can make it fit.
Lee Stroble in his video listed below “ The Case for the Creator” stated (5 min. 28 sec into the video) The Case for a Creator
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajqH4y8G0MI


That “There is no way you can Harmonize Neo Darwinism with Christianity, I could never understand Christians who would say “ Well I believe in God yet I believe in Evolution as well” You see Darwin’s idea about the development of life led to his theory that modern science now generally defines as an undirected process completely devoid of any purpose or plan,”. Now how could God direct an undirected process? How could God have purpose in a plan behind a system that has no plan and no purpose? It just does not make sense.
It didn’t make sense to me in 1966 and it doesn’t make sense to me now.
The Apostle Paul wrote to His Son Timothy stating that “ in 2 Timothy 4:3-4 “For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, [because] they have itching ears, they will heap up for themselves teachers; and they will turn [their] ears away from the truth, and be turned aside to fables.”

Those Christians who believe in evolution have no idea how that effects their theology.
What is theistic evolution?
http://www.gotquestions.org/theistic-evolution.html


Eternity is a Long Time to be wrong about this

What Hath Darwin Wrought?
http://www.whathathdarwinwrought.com/

Darwin's Deadly Legacy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qHb3uq1O0Q
Darwin & Eugenics....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vuTPHvedOOU&feature=related

Creation In The 21st Century - Planet Earth Is Special 1 of 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyUjhgsEJFw

Creation in the 21st Century - The Evidence Disputes Darwin 1 of 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbCbfzmhAN8

Some modern scientists who have accepted the biblical account of Creation
http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/bios/

More than 600 Scientist with PHD’s who have Signed A SCIENTIFIC DISSENT FROM DARWINISM
http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-download.php?id=660

Answer 8

The introduction to Genesis and to the whole Bible ascribes everything to the living God, creating, making, acting, moving, and speaking. There is no room for evolution without a flat denial of Divine revelation. One must be true the other false. All of God’s works are good, great, wondrous, and perfect.

Man starts from nothing. He begins in helplessness, ignorance, and inexperience. All his works, therefore, proceed on the principle of evolution. This principle is only seen in human affairs: from the hut to the palace; from the canoe to the ocean liner; from the spade to the plowshare to machines. But the birds build their nests today as at the beginning. There is growth and development within man, but no passing, change, or evolution out from one into another.

For this theory or fallacy of evolution to be true there would be evident stages of evolution today. You would be able to find species in many stages of evolution in nature right now. For this theory or fallacy of evolution to be true there would be no God. And that’s exactly what evolutionists believe and are trying prove. The evolutionist bases his or her conclusions on human assumptions and reasoning, instead of on the documentary evidence of the manuscripts.

><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
The proof and evidence is all around you and everywhere, undeniable proof, and indisputable visible evidence. It is called creation and life. Unless your are blind, deaf, and senseless. You can see, smell, taste, hear, feel, and examine the evidence.
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
We live on a planet teeming with life. Plant life with approximately 250,000 species, animal life with over a million species. Scientists are learning just how complex life is. So complex that it requires design. The evidence of design requires a designer. Scientists are also learning the conditions for life; just how perfect conditions here on planet Earth are to support all this life.
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
The human brain, it absorbs forty megabytes per second of data while awake. That is two terabytes of data a day. At night, it sorts and stores that data through the creation of new chemical bonds and synaptic connectors.
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
Sure, right, this all just happened and evolved. This sort of thinking takes considerable faith, exponentially more faith than believing in a creator.
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>

Answer 9

The problem with your question is "(vs)". There is no conflict between the biblical truth of initial Creation and the clearly defined scientific truth of post-Creation biological evolution. Truth cannot conflict with truth.
.

Answer 10

I believe that God created everything seen and unseen. I believe He created the world long ago, not billions of years but also not 6000 yrs ago either. maybe more like 50,000 yrs ago. Not realy sure. Haven't tried to calculate it. But I do believe that He created the planets first, then atmosphere, then plants, fish and birds, animals, then Adam and then Eve.

I believe that the process of evolution exists. We have proof of that. Plants and trees use to be much bigger, animals use to be much bigger (dinosaurs-giant lizards). But I don't believe that human beings evolved from apes. Apes would no longer be in existence if they evolved. Plus, being a Catholic, I believe that God created manking in His image, in His likeness. He created us differently from planets and animals. We have souls, they don't. We have a purpose, to know God and to live with Him eternally. And so on. He wouldn't create apes and then let people mutate change from them and give us distinct differences from the animals. He wouldn't have His Son, Jesus, become a man that was just here from evolution. This makes no sense. People are higher than animals. We dominate over them. We are to be their caretakers and masters. God gave mankind the earth to have a terrific earthly experience. To live with the notion that I am here because my ancestors mutated from an ape species is a hard concept to hold on to. GOd's creation makes more sense to me.