As for RB he knows, his emotions tell him so. Church people have no need of theories or evidence.
Evidence for their god belief is not needed, and evidence against it is not appropriate. They are in their own little world.
2007-04-29 14:37:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
My question would be what do you base your theory on? I was an agnostic for most of my life because I knew that you couldn't prove that there wasn't a God and because I knew that the existence of matter in this universe is illogical because something cannot come from nothing and saying that matter has just always existed doesn't provide a rational explanation because logically nothing should exist.
So how does your theory seek to prove that there is no extra-dimensional Creator responsible for this universe? How does your theory explain the paradox of matter existing when logically nothing should exist?
2007-04-29 21:50:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by Martin S 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
As far as I am concerned my belief in God is not a theory. It is based on facts. The existence of God can be proven through scientific and Biblical evidence. Atheists simply ignore the hard evidence.
Atheists are restless souls in denial. All the hard evidence of the existence of God is there, people just don't want to believe. Why? Probably because of the commitments you have to make once you become a believer.
Albert Einstein, the most intelligent man the world has ever known, became a theist through his scientific discoveries. Einstein's theories have been thoroughly proved and verified by experiments and measurements.
But there's an even more important implication of Einstein's discovery. Not only does the universe have a beginning, but also time itself, our own dimension of cause and effect, began with the Big Bang.
That's right -- time itself does not exist before then. The very line of time begins with that creation event. Matter, energy, time and space were created in an instant by intelligence outside of space and time.
About this intelligence, Albert Einstein wrote in his book "The World As I See It" that the harmony of natural law "Reveals an intelligence of such superiority that, compared with it, all the systematic thinking and acting of human beings is an utterly insignificant reflection.
"He went on to write, "Everyone who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the Universe--a spirit vastly superior to that of man, and one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble."
For more information go to this link. "A Day Without Yesterday" - Albert Einstein, Georges Lemaitre and the Big Bang http://clicks.aweber.com/z/ct/?u8j4uiot8...
Peace and every blessing!
2007-04-29 22:22:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
No God is also a theory, I believe there is a God. One day we will both know the truth. If you say there is no God then for your sake and the others you convinced of the same thing you better be right.Because if you're not?????
2007-04-29 21:40:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You know, there are actually debates between theists and non-theists where they make arguments for their respective positions. It isn't all about emotion. I say may the best case win.
2007-04-29 21:36:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jonathan 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Occam, is it? Why does your head look so... so.. elongated in your avatar? You aren't, theoretically, evolving right before our very eyes, are you?
Me?
No emotions.
2007-04-29 21:35:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by vox populi 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The evidence that I have of God in my life outweighs your opinion of whether or not He exists.
Sorry.
2007-04-29 21:39:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by arewethereyet 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
there are documents that have been written throughout the ages that there is a god
2007-04-29 21:42:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
One day we will all know. As for me, I know.
2007-04-29 21:34:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by RB 7
·
0⤊
1⤋