English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

22 answers

What does that have to do with the ark? All the continents are connected you know. Now there is just some water in the low places between them. It may not have always been that way. Poor argument.

2007-04-29 13:52:36 · answer #1 · answered by DATA DROID 4 · 0 0

The flood story goes back long before the Jewish preists placed it in the Bible. It is a very old tale. The evidence that humans were around when during the last ice age is a matter of fact. The evidence that the flood myth is universal and is told on every continent is a matter of fact. The mediteranian broke through a small land dam after the last ice age flooding what was once the black lake and created the black sea. just north of turkey. The villages were destroyed water rose a mile or two a day. It was so catostrophic they told the tale around that campfire until writing was invented and then they wrote it down. It happened like that all over the world.
Get over it and let people beleive what they want its none of your business. If you want to look up the geological evidence that sea levels rose dramatically and humans where here to see it you can do that . Dont you find it amazing that the story lived on and ended up in every culure on earth.

2007-04-29 14:01:43 · answer #2 · answered by Rich 5 · 0 0

I've always wondered that too. When the floods came, did the Ark have any "pick-up points" like the present train and bus stations, or cab ranks, where the animals waited in a queue? Or did God expect them all to pack their bags and travel to a certain point and wait at the departure gate until the Ark was ready to launch? AND, what if TEN of every kind rocked up at the entrance...who actually picked the TWO (or SEVEN) of each kind that were to be saved, with the rest consigned to the watery depths.

A bit like "Life of Brian" isn't it......"Yes, you can come in, no sorry not You, you are for destruction, I'm sorry, ...next....?"

2007-04-29 13:54:34 · answer #3 · answered by Spikey and Scruffy's Mummy 5 · 2 0

In the days of Noah all the continents wer all togther, when the waters from deep inside the earth errupted, they split apart. www.creationscience.com. I am sure God called the certain animals to the ark, and the ones that were going to die, never heard the call.

2007-04-29 14:04:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i do no longer keep in mind being asked in affirmation no remember if i believe a hundred% of the bible, and that i do no longer think of thoroughly believing a hundred% of the bible with out deeply thinking, figuring out and concluding what might have been achievable may well be an fairly sensible thank you to grow to be an lively believer. there are a number of areas of the Bible that are questionable, extraordinarily interior the previous testomony with many probably being Jewish memories or fables. i'm no longer asserting the Bible is undesirable! Oh no! i think of as long as you learn the classes from the Bible, and act nicely, there is not any longer a difficulty. i think of someone ought to examine the Bible and believe none of it (different than for probably the recent testomony. it would be somewhat bit a difficulty if he did no longer believe that area!), and nonetheless be a lively Christian if he found out the classes from it. Does it incredibly remember in the adventure that your pal would not believe that one area? Does it incredibly understand that it became written Noah lived till 4 hundred and something? as long as i believe in my God and his salvation, does denying one somewhat strange tale incredibly have plenty touching on my events as a Christian? No, no longer likely! it incredibly is extremely undesirable to believe blindly, and that i do believe the Bible advocates this too (Solomon, Jonah, Elijah, Jesus, to call some people who i believe recommend this). in any case, in case you nonetheless think of that your pal is being some offensive fool (even regardless of the undeniable fact that he won't be), I do believe that there is a mountain someplace in probably Nepal that's mentioned to have the Noah's Ark around someplace. no person from the exterior international has seen it i do no longer think of (basically the clergymen on the mountain are, for it incredibly is sacred).

2016-12-29 17:49:04 · answer #5 · answered by domnick 3 · 0 0

I admit that there are things that are difficult to understand about how today's world came about when we compare what we see with the scant historical accounts of events given us in the Bible. But I believe for a couple of reasons. First I believe because I believe in the divine inspiration of the Bible. Secondly I believe because of the large number of similar stories found throughout the world in the majority of cultures.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/flood-myths.html

Flood Stories from Around the World
by Mark Isaak.
Copyright © 1996-2002

Third I believe because a close examination of the accounts given in the Bible after the time of Noah seem to indicate that the world was one continental land mass that was split apart just as scientists believe today when they compare the outlines of Europe and Africa with North and South America.

Genesis 10:25 To Eber were born two sons: the name of the one was Peleg, for in his days the earth was divided, and his brother's name was Joktan.

2007-04-29 13:59:49 · answer #6 · answered by Martin S 7 · 0 1

It's an Ark, not an arc. Noah's Ark was designed by God as a device to winnow the scoffer from those who are seeking His salvation. When you understand this, all the questions will become irrelevant.
http://www.schneblin.com/studies/pdfs/winnowing_wheat_chaff.pdf

2007-04-29 13:53:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Do we actually know which animals Noah took with him???

and btw the Ark did exist and has been found in Turkey at Mt. Ararat

2007-04-29 14:08:33 · answer #8 · answered by Servette 6 · 0 0

That's # 15 or 16 on the list of reason not to believe in Noah's ark...

2007-04-29 13:51:48 · answer #9 · answered by Eleventy 6 · 1 1

either
1) pangaea

2) intercontinental migration most likely began while sea-levels were still low during and immediately following the post-flood ice age when much of the water was still trapped in ice at the poles. lower sea-levels would have left the continental shelves exposed, connecting all of the major land masses through land bridges.

2007-04-29 13:53:47 · answer #10 · answered by Silver 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers