I hope that you really do not think that Jesus (pbuh) was white. That is just what the church whats you to think. If you were to see a Jew or Arab that has not had Europeans added to the mix you will see that he was anything but white.
2007-04-29 11:46:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Layla 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
By your proposal, think of this: we know for sure that Jesus of Nazareth, the Son of God, was a Jew; therefore, Jews are superior to every other ethnic group.
If you can accept that, then you are free to accept the idea that a white Jesus means that whites are superior to other races, and, conversely, a black Jesus means that blacks are superior to other races. Well, we know Jesus was Middle Eastern, a Western Asian. So, according to your proposal, Western Asians are superior to Europeans, Africans, Far East Asians, Pacific Islanders, and Native Americans. (Did I leave anybody out?)
Alternately, you can accept the idea that Jesus, in becoming a human being, had to be of a specific ethnicity (or blend of ethnicities), born in a specific place in a specific time to a specific culture as a specific gender. Whatever Jesus chose to become does not elevate that kind above all others.
2007-04-29 18:45:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by MNL_1221 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Ok, this goes on the assumption that Jesus is white, which there's no reason to believe that. His hair was like wool... I don't know any white people with hair that kinky. That said, Mary was Jewish, and Jesus was Jewish, and God isn't human, so he's not any particular race.
Now, if you want to talk about white sons of god, then there are plenty of European sons of gods to choose from... Lugh, Apollo, Llew Llaw Gyffes, etc.
Horus is an Egyptian son of Osiris and Isis, and would naturally have an Egyptian appearance, which is a mix of African, Middle Eastern, and Greek. I've heard it said that the image of Mary holding Christ is based on images of Isis holding Horus.
2007-04-29 19:28:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lecia 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
He was Jewish. Following your logic, Jews are superior to other races.
2007-04-30 11:55:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by smt 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, if that is true he'd have to have been a middle eastern and so not exactly white or black. And what you are talking about is religiously supported racism.
2007-04-29 18:42:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by Blackbird 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
if you believe that then you;re dummer then i am.i;am white but i believe jesus was born in the middle east that would make him non white.but color has no bearing here.jesus loves us all.because were all children of god no matter what color.so get real here.
2007-04-29 18:46:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by bigjoe8127 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Cracker, please.
Jesus was of Middle Eastern decent, making him brown in color.
Honkies need to learn their history, unless your Mormon and go on the whole, "God punished them by turning their skin a diffrent color" kick.
2007-04-29 18:43:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by shivercraft 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
But he wasn't white. Now what?
2007-04-29 18:46:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sun: supporting gay rights 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually, he was a Jew who are more strongly related to Arabs than to whites.
2007-04-29 18:43:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by Muffie 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Look the photos, of the Nobel prize winners, and get your conclusion.
2007-04-29 18:44:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋