We have known for quite awhile that we have two major self-supporting faction of Hezbolla terrorist calls functioning within the US and others in Canada.
There is the Florida based drug cartel that funnels drug money from the U S. into Canada and then into Lebanon -we know who they are and who they are in league with.
And then there are the cigarette profit mongers------they obtain cigarettes without paying full taxation therefore can make ma handsome profit selling these cheaper cigarettes online.-again that profit goes to supply weapons and training to cells across our country.
We are in danger that at any time Al Querida could call for an attack and all of these cells would then begin waging war within.--Their goal is for all of America to join Islam---or die.
I strongly feel we need a government sanctioned "Hit Squad" to go in a clandestine series of operations to kill these cells----no going though court systems---------these cells know
our laws and have been trained in t
2007-04-29
10:22:04
·
15 answers
·
asked by
EZMZ
7
in
Politics & Government
➔ Military
and have been trained in the art of avoiding prosecution. They fully know how to used our legal system to full advantage to harm us.
My question is------what could we do to make this happen? A hit squad to take them out--------
what could be some pros and cons of creating such an entity?
Also I think it would be imperative this branch of law enforcement would be sworn to an oath to not violate a rigid framework of rules designed to protect the innocent.------------and in return they would be granted total immunity to any kind of civil or legal obligations.
What do you think?
2007-04-29
10:29:32 ·
update #1
Ok Folks-I do see your point-----what I'm looking for here----is it possible to create such a thing as this and not be able to keep it under control?
2007-04-29
10:33:51 ·
update #2
I don't claim to be the sharpest tool in the shed---------and maybe my idea is unworkable----buy like the gentleman below said -desperate times call for desperate measures---------why should our enemies be afforded the same right US citizens who have fought for these rights-----they did not fight for us----the protections should not apply to our enemies.
2007-04-29
10:44:36 ·
update #3
There you go----this is exactly why I asked this question-------not to try and force an agenda---------but to explore the truth--------Buzzard feels it is a bad idea-----------and I value his opinion HIGHLY---------folks-----the next presidential election to be held in 2008 is a part of the war between good and evil----------just remember that when you go to the polls-------do not allow a slick politician to convince you to support an agenda when you know in your heart it is really wrong--------we often times are used as pawns withoit even knowing it.
2007-04-29
12:29:16 ·
update #4
Do we finally get to blame the Cubans for helping terrorists? I know they would be the lower idiots on the scale of terrorism, but they've don't it, by thieving off the American people, much like Mexico. We already know Cubans in Florida are the first to start illegally selling food stamps in Florida, so what is to stop them from helping terrorists groups?
The cell, is the Cubans, I have no doubt. Cubans are the ones who claim to be poor, and needy, begging off Americans, and stealing. Even here in California, I was mobbed by Cubans, and all they got was $4, my watch, and a key-chain! I have no doubt that Cubans in Florida can be coerced rather easily by terrorist groups, and the American government should look into them, as well, as Arabs. Just a thought.
2007-04-30 05:44:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by xenypoo 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I like the way you think ! I believe however, that we have first responders with the capability you described. Not just one organization is capable of this, many are ready, when the call goes out.
America will never join Islam, if anything we will see a time when when we need to eradicate Islam from our land. Sooner rather than later would be nice.
I believe that Islam has set up many phony cells in our country, for the purpose of keeping our agents and intelligence community chasing it's @ss. A lot of resources get poured into a black hole when we allow ourselves to follow the dummy brigade, in this manner.
We do need an effective hit squad and not one that allows our legal system to be tied up with dead end nonsense. This is the problem with busting this scum too early, it changes the focus of our first responders and gives the evil-doers, wiggle room to go in yet another direction !
2007-04-29 10:48:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by briang731/ bvincent 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Brandon- That system of checks and balances that you speak of is the very weakness that is being exploited here and now and the reasoning behind this hit squad proposal,to circumvent the exploitation of our own system against us it appears the enemies who desire to do us harm know these weak areas and are exploiting us. We do need to find a way to seal the chinks in our armor. Remember these people do not play by our rules they love cultivating and creating psychotic personality types and using them as human shields and as suicide bombers.
Ans when they take our soldiers by surprise they tend to torture them in the most brutal fashion. Often times they have been beaten so savagely it is quite difficult to identify the mangled corpse. They are also fond of cutting the heads off our guys after taking turns beating them with rifle butts.
Sadly the enemy is redefining the meaning of inhumane tactics. Some politicians want to slap they wrists after a few months of incarceration where the living conditions sometimes exceed what they had been accustomed to. And then ship them home to fight again. We have got to stop letting congress and the crazed organization known as the United Nations from dictating to our generals how to conduct this conflict,civil war,war, or whatever you choose to call it.
Lets cut some red tape because it strangles us.
2007-04-29 18:13:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well I do not think your idea is workable. The basis of our political system is ultimately one of checks and balances. In theory, the 3 branches of govenment limit each other's power and in turn our limited by democratic process. I think the idea of an extrajudicial force authorized to use lethal force against American citizens is inadvisable and frightening. To whom would they be accountable? And who decides who is a threat and who is not? Also what happens in case of mistakes? I think your worldview is one of absolute truth where their is good and evil and all measures are authorized to destroy evil. From this point of view it is rational and acceptable. I also think you're being alarmist and reactionary. It would litterally take more than 100 September 11ths to even significantly damage our homeland. You say their goal is that all America join Islam, well I believe that is the goal of all religious groups here. I think the world is more complex than the black/white, good/bad dichotomy also. I think that these groups are spawned out of political disenfranchisement, nativism, and a reaction to globalization. The groups and cells are just symptoms of this and eliminating them only leads to short term victories. If Osama bin Laden was killed today, it would make no dent in the broader Islamist movement. Besides it is undeniable that statistically speaking Americans will always kill each other in far greater numbers than suicidal jihadists (i.e. murders, car accidents, etc.), yet there is no outcry to stop these.
2007-04-29 16:28:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Brandon 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
I like this questions because, it bespeaks the true desperation of the global situation.
I presume, you've considered the impact this has on diplomacy.
As a nation our international reputation is dismal and we've become a domestic psychodrama filled with characters like Cho, and the other deluded sociopaths to highlight the diseased "American Social Psychology".
The thing about "Imus", the thing about "Anna Nicole" all distractions from the fact that, America needs to develop a "sense of urgency" about converting to Bio-Fuels--right now--we need a "Manhattan Project" about eliminating our dependence on " Foreign Oil"! Hell, we can "Kick That ***" when we eliminate you from our market place!
WE need a "National Works Program to employ our citizens in the improvement of our " Homeland."
SO, THE ANSWER IS _____NO!
We must use our talent to Improve America.
Protect our Borders to the max and become "Semi-Isolationist!"
2007-04-29 15:33:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by FunkyMcNasty 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Desperate times call for desperate measures, we have to realize our laws govern us, they don't pertain to our enemies, they should be free game. They play dirty we should stay within the parameters of what they do. That is all they will understand. Look at how they are treated in their country when caught for spying, why should we treat them differently? Because we're civilized? I don't think they see the difference, they see that as our weakness and they are using it against us. Time to change strategies.
2007-04-29 10:35:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think as long as we continue to protect terrorist above US citizens that we are in danger.
I say go for the drug cartel, Al Queda & Hezbollah with all we have & wipe them all the face of the earth. Exreme methods or not.
2007-04-29 10:36:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Wolfpacker 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Viva! I'm always deeply troubled by all of the news that I read about our Natinal Security. And I must be honest. This scares the living Hell out of me. Keep up the work. I got you on Contact. Let me know whatever you find out. I'm only asking that all who are this scared of our Security. Be ready to make your presence known. In November of `08. It's us or them. Simple as that. Thanks dear Friend
2007-04-29 12:18:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Nunya Bidniss 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
What you are advocating is a facist police state and I would like to politely ask you to leave the country now. . . there are lots of established facist governments in the world and I am certain you would feel right at home.
Those willing to exchange liberties for security deserve neither liberty nor security. ~ Ben Franklin
2007-04-29 10:28:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by wyllow 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
I almost like the idea, you really went straight to a solution without hesitation, kinda cool!
2007-04-29 13:57:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋