and i can hypothetically prove ur wrong ....
2007-04-29 09:58:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
No... that's not an argument against the existence of gods. I mean, if someone were never told that spandex exists and were never exposed to such a thing, it'd still exist. I'm not saying gods DO exist, but what you've presented here isn't a compelling argument.
Yes, spandex is conceivable, but again, if the person isn't told about it for their entire lives, they won't know about it and wouldn't consider the idea (unless they happen to be interested in inventing and manufacturing new types of material). Just because a person or a people don't know about something and therefore wouldn't consider it doesn't mean it's nonexistent.
AGAIN... I'm not saying that this would imply gods do exist. They don't. I'm just saying that this is a particularly weak argument.
2007-04-29 09:59:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by ZER0 C00L ••AM••VT•• 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
Even cultures who have never heard of God have a conscience. Conscience means "with knowledge". People know that it is wrong to steal, murder, lie, etc. It is not coincidence that these values form the 10 Commandments (God's Law). God has written His laws on the hearts of everyone; and has set aside a day when all law-breakers will be judged. If God is fair, He must punish murderers and rapists. He will also punish all liars, all thieves; everyone who has broken His laws. The Bible says, "There is none who does good, No, not one."
The incredibly good news is that God loved us so much he send Jesus Christ (who was fully man AND fully God), to take the punishment that should have been ours. He was beaten beyond recognition and nailed to a cross to suffer and die an excruciating death. When you think about Him doing that for us, it should break your heart. When you think about how much our sin offends God, it should make you want to turn against it, apologize to God, and put your faith in our savior. When you do that, God will make you a new creature with new desires.
May I suggest that you are trying to prove that God does not exist because you are too proud to admit that you need a savior? Or is it that you love your sin too much? If you are still not convinced, please take the QUICK 8-QUESTION TEST at the link below.
Thank you for your question. I say this in love when I tell you that you did not prove anything. Please consider the alternative. It is so much better.
2007-04-29 10:50:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Sister Christian 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Even people that never were exposed to the idea of God have the innate necessity to worship Nature, as the native Indians do, or be connected to the Spiritual World, as the Egyptians did. Therefore, that tells me that there is a God, an intelligent God, that puts inside people's heart the necessity to grow spiritually.
My religion is Spiritism.
Peace!
2007-04-29 10:04:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by Janet Reincarnated 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
in case you're talking some evidence grounded in symbolic logic (or semantics, which whilst rigorous is likewise symbolic logic) then it won't be able to be completed. Kurt Godel's Incompleteness Theorem demonstrates that for the time of any logical equipment, it incredibly is achievable to construct genuine statements that could no longer be shown. subsequently lack of ability to discover a evidence of existence does no longer practice non-existence. (This has constantly been intuited; Godel proved it.) each so often non-existence could be mentioned. as an occasion we are able to look on the be conscious God and practice "there is not any letter X" by using inspection. Now there is often some hypermetaphysical fool who needs to represent that for the time of certainty there's a letter X, in spite of the undeniable fact that this is invisible; and could undertaking you to coach the inexistence of the invisible letter X. i think of experimental evidence ought to lie in demonstrating that each physique people who believe they adventure God incredibly adventure something else. (it incredibly is what all atheists, and so forth. anticipate as we communicate, with out evidence: that each physique own eyewitness of God is a few sort of myth.) If an option source of the 'myth' could be 'proved', in each case -- if the delusions could be created, envisioned, manipulated by using instrumentation (somewhat than by using human rhetoric) -- that's, if the particular pschological habit of the guy and physiological habit of the ideas could be mapped and correlated, that could probably be taken as evidence that God as experienced by using witnesses is man made. yet there might nonetheless be people who refuse to believe it. different than for God, what with regard to the soul? Do in addition they practice that does no longer exist? Or ... extra exciting ... do they practice that it does?
2016-12-29 17:08:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Let's see. First of all, people have an innate tendency for religion. Atheism and agnosticism are the result of influence, whether by the media or by personal matters. Also you had to eventually hear about God and Chrisitanity at one point in your life. Unless you live in Oceania, you can't escape christianity and unless you live in an alternate reality, you can't escape God.
2007-04-29 10:16:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by denwel33 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
That doesn't prove he doesn't exist, it just means that noone would know about him.
Try using science and history to prove he doesn't exist, it actually works that way.
2007-04-29 10:14:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by Frank 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
My parents never talked to me about God, but I knew Him. How on earth you would have that experience if God was not real.
2007-04-29 10:06:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by SeeTheLight 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm an Atheist....and I'm surprised you're still trying to change how Christians feel/believe in God.
If it's not for you.....move on.
2007-04-29 10:01:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by daljack -a girl 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
You have hypothetically proved nothing.
I wasn't told about God as a child but have somehow always known there is a God.
2007-04-29 10:00:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
What about that which cannot be explained by science, such as logics and ethics, what then do we use to explain these.
typical of science, the only reason why it wants to remove god is so that it can be god itself.
2007-04-29 10:01:37
·
answer #11
·
answered by Adam of the wired 7
·
1⤊
2⤋