The Iraqi war: Vietnam part 2 for Americans? Americans fighting a losing war again?

Answer 1

You can't compare Iraq to Vietnam. Vietnam was about communism, Iraq is supposed to be about toppling a threat to the U.S. and replacing it with a freely elected government, though that to is debatable. I don't know that I would call Iraq a losing war, we did accomplish some of our goals, such as the overthrow and capture of Saddam Hussein. Iraq's problem is congressional and executive oversight. The officers identify the targets and outline the mission, and then sit around while the Joint Chiefs, the President and his pertinent cabinet members, and congress argue about this. This is the only parallel that I can see with 'Nam. The soldiers know their mission, but they aren't allowed to carry it out. I think that this is a winnable war, as long as we are allowed to do what needs to be done and the Iraqui's want us to help them. However, without local support this war will be lost and the next government to gain power may be worse than the one we overthrew.

Answer 2

apparently, human beings fairly do not examine heritage in its fullest volume. us of a develop into prevailing the conflict, also fought very demanding hostile to a relentless opponent. besides the indisputable fact that, politics back contained in the states reason for a right away withdrawl from the rustic. The troops did not lose the conflict, politics lost this conflict. It develop into very winnable and develop into contained in the waking, yet no man or woman wanted to recommend the attempt it took to finish that project. except the troops that were despatched there without them desirous to finish that. Oh yeah, the French were there first and were given demolished/slaughtered, which led to us of a to step in, and that develop right into a really very very enormous reason we were there. alongside with helpful rubber timber that are grown there. You ask why do we assume of we gained the conflict? tell me this, what number circumstances have you ever heard us of a in a descussion then imagine about Vietnam and their cutting-edge state contained in the global community. they are literally not something, and for a lengthy time period they're going to be not something. As for us of a, we can stand solid. So ask your self that similar question back.

Answer 3

gee, I want to say no, but I want to let you line up on the "Quote" winning side first so you won't be able to slime out of your position when the wind changes.

Defeatist, live your life in shame and never know the true meaning of life. Just go hide behind a rock till we sound the all clear and stay out of the way.

Ret. USAF SNCO

Answer 4

Thats the way its shaping up!..But it will be worse..In Vietnam, we didnt have people who were maniacal religious fanatics!..Who didnt fear being killed, in fact welcomed it!..Even want to be killed for Allah and his "one true prophet".When you have a situation like that..PLUS religious factionalism thrown in, you cant win!..You cant even control!..Unless your willing to slaughter every single one of them!..Leave none alive..Not one!...And even if your evil enough to do this, all that will happen is the galvanisation of other mouth frothing shrieking screaming Islamic fanatics, in every country in the world to attack you!..What the US and Australian and British governments have not understood is that these people have never shifted their thinking out of the dark ages!..They cannot be defeated..Unless your willing to kill them all..Are you?

Answer 5

The only losers in this country are the puling plutocrat partisan pinheads in al-congress.

Answer 6

Wars in this day and age are not fought to win, they are fought to make people rich. If the US wanted to win this war all they had to do was bombard Iraq with an aerial assault until Baghdad was leveled ans send in the ground troops to clean up.

Answer 7

no