English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

FLAT OUT LIED. RIGHT IN OUR FACES.

2007-04-29 07:05:59 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

18 answers

(1) You obviously haven't been in Iraq.

(2) You obviously aren't in a "need to know" position.

(3) If you think there were absolutely no WMDs in Iraq, you're out of your mind.

(4) The real question should be why none of the finds made in Iraq ever went public, and why the silence persists.

EDIT: Oh and the rest of you whiners who repeat the same lines over and over again need to think to yourselves: "Where do I get my information from? How far am I from the information? Am I in a position where I am entitled to know the truth?"

The conceit of the American public is in believing they know everything through television.

2007-04-29 08:42:37 · answer #1 · answered by Nat 5 · 4 1

The war was never about the known existence of WMD's (although WMD's use have been documented), but the fact that no one could disprove the fact that there wasn't any WMD's. Congress had access to the same information and agreed that WMD's potentially existed. Many past, present and future presidential candidates are on public record stating this (John Kerry, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, etc.). Many foreign governments are also on record as independently corroborating this information. If you want to impeach Bush for this, you also need to recall all politicians that agreed (or have them abstain from the impeachment vote as a conflict of interest) as well as block all agreeing governments from doing business with this country. This entire scenario could have been prevented had Iraq allowed the UN weapons inspectors full access to complete their mission instead of throwing them out of the country...repeatedly.

2007-04-29 14:52:24 · answer #2 · answered by xtowgrunt 6 · 4 0

Munitions Found in Iraq Meet WMD Criteria, Official Says

2007-05-01 05:35:40 · answer #3 · answered by redphoenix40 2 · 0 0

WMD found, not in the quantities that they thought or would have liked them to be. They were mostly the ones that we had given to them back in the 80's.

2007-04-29 15:12:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

He is a political crony , is a big money person plus most of the people in government are the ones who put him there in the first place as president. But the main reason if he got impeached is his business buddies would lose alot of money in government contracts and beyond.

2007-04-29 16:05:55 · answer #5 · answered by squick24 3 · 0 3

YOU ARE SEVERLY MISINFORMED. May be you might be looking for shiny nuclear rockets?

We have uncovered hundreds of thousands of chemical artillary shells which could easily have killed millions if employed. There have been laboratories found that were test sites for biological agents which evidence suggests were tested in artillary shells as well.

WE HAVE UNCOVERED MASS GRAVES: over 300,000 bodies of civilians which were killed by chemical agents.

Quit watching CNN

2007-04-29 14:23:17 · answer #6 · answered by Voice of Liberty 5 · 3 0

not 1 WMD??? are you kidding, there has been several artillery shells with poison gas found. the press changed the argument to no stockpiles of WMD's when some were found, or don't you remember that? How can we expect any more from the Bush Haters when they can't even get the facts straight in their question?

2007-04-29 14:13:25 · answer #7 · answered by John K 1 · 6 3

This war was never about WMD or 9-11. It was about OIL and controlling and enforcing that all Oil Trade is carried out in US Dollars. If OPEC succeeds in going to business internationally that means the collapse of the US economy and possibly the US owned World Monetary Fund.

You don't believe Saddam was hanged because he killed a few Kurds do you, especially when we gave him the means to do it.
Iraq, Iran and North Korea all switched their international accounts to Euros just before they were declared the axis of evil.

2007-04-29 14:16:25 · answer #8 · answered by U-98 6 · 1 5

Bush hasn't been impeached because he has only lied about insignificant things such as "weapons of mass destruction" and why we needed to go to "war" and allow hundreds of thousands of Iraqis to be killed, along with 3,300 U.S. soldiers.
If you want Bush to be impeached, get someone to give him a b.j. - that'll do it! Our honorable members of Congress are NOTHING if not protectors of our high moral standards!
-RKO- 04/29/07

2007-04-29 14:12:25 · answer #9 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 2 3

Because until now the republicans had control of both the House and the US Senate! Now they're waiting to see if dumb *** george will comply or cry a river and complain about what the populace really wants from the POTUS!

2007-04-29 15:55:37 · answer #10 · answered by Jake 3 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers