Newspapers are too interested in Rosie O'Donald to report religious experiences, but there are plenty of them.
2007-04-28 15:04:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Billllius 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The problem with the print media at the present time is most of them support a secular progressive agenda in which religion has no place. To give religion a voice would go against what the paper wants to promote, a world where there are no judgements made about any kind of behavior, good or bad.
2007-04-28 22:17:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by bjmcquiston 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
Long-Awaited Medical Study Questions the Power of Prayer
New York Times
By BENEDICT CAREY
Published: March 31, 2006
Prayers offered by strangers had no effect on the recovery of people who were undergoing heart surgery, a large and long-awaited study has found.
And patients who knew they were being prayed for had a higher rate of post-operative complications like abnormal heart rhythms, perhaps because of the expectations the prayers created, the researchers suggested.
Because it is the most scientifically rigorous investigation of whether prayer can heal illness, the study, begun almost a decade ago and involving more than 1,800 patients, has for years been the subject of speculation.
The question has been a contentious one among researchers. Proponents have argued that prayer is perhaps the most deeply human response to disease, and that it may relieve suffering by some mechanism that is not yet understood. Skeptics have contended that studying prayer is a waste of money and that it presupposes supernatural intervention, putting it by definition beyond the reach of science.
At least 10 studies of the effects of prayer have been carried out in the last six years, with mixed results. The new study was intended to overcome flaws in the earlier investigations. The report was scheduled to appear in The American Heart Journal next week, but the journal's publisher released it online yesterday.
In a hurriedly convened news conference, the study's authors, led by Dr. Herbert Benson, a cardiologist and director of the Mind/Body Medical Institute near Boston, said that the findings were not the last word on the effects of so-called intercessory prayer. But the results, they said, raised questions about how and whether patients should be told that prayers were being offered for them.
"One conclusion from this is that the role of awareness of prayer should be studied further," said Dr. Charles Bethea, a cardiologist at Integris Baptist Medical Center in Oklahoma City and a co-author of the study.
Other experts said the study underscored the question of whether prayer was an appropriate subject for scientific study.
"The problem with studying religion scientifically is that you do violence to the phenomenon by reducing it to basic elements that can be quantified, and that makes for bad science and bad religion," said Dr. Richard Sloan, a professor of behavioral medicine at Columbia and author of a forthcoming book, "Blind Faith: The Unholy Alliance of Religion and Medicine."
The study cost $2.4 million, and most of the money came from the John Templeton Foundation, which supports research into spirituality. The government has spent more than $2.3 million on prayer research since 2000.
Dean Marek, a chaplain at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., and a co-author of the report, said the study said nothing about the power of personal prayer or about prayers for family members and friends.
Working in a large medical center like Mayo, Mr. Marek said, "You hear tons of stories about the power of prayer, and I don't doubt them."
In the study, the researchers monitored 1,802 patients at six hospitals who received coronary bypass surgery, in which doctors reroute circulation around a clogged vein or artery.
The patients were broken into three groups. Two were prayed for; the third was not. Half the patients who received the prayers were told that they were being prayed for; half were told that they might or might not receive prayers.
The researchers asked the members of three congregations — St. Paul's Monastery in St. Paul; the Community of Teresian Carmelites in Worcester, Mass.; and Silent Unity, a Missouri prayer ministry near Kansas City — to deliver the prayers, using the patients' first names and the first initials of their last names.
The congregations were told that they could pray in their own ways, but they were instructed to include the phrase, "for a successful surgery with a quick, healthy recovery and no complications."
Analyzing complications in the 30 days after the operations, the researchers found no differences between those patients who were prayed for and those who were not.
2007-04-28 22:03:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
It depends on the newswritter and the Editor-in-Chief whether they will have column in religion or not. It is none of your business. If you want , produce your own newspaper and publish religious matters as you wish.
jtm
2007-04-28 22:07:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jesus M 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
most of them are too skeptical to believe an orgasm, much less a religious experience lol
2007-04-28 22:05:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by arewethereyet 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
because theyre afraid what the effect of the opposing population will have on their company
2007-04-28 22:03:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by bballsistaKT 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
it would be a better world if the newpapers spoke of "spiritual experiance"
2007-04-28 22:06:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by ~testube Jebus~ 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
they're really not real, and any errors would cause an outrage, for and against,...
2007-04-28 22:36:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by a soul 3
·
1⤊
1⤋