English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Will people incorectly assume that I am condoning murder against abortion doctors and their staff?

2007-04-28 05:50:25 · 11 answers · asked by mouthbreather77 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

11 answers

Anyone who murders someone has no right to call themselves 'pro-life'.

Perhaps Jews and Muslims who are pro-life realize that violence is not a moral response in any context. Unlike some 'so-called' Christians.

2007-04-28 05:55:28 · answer #1 · answered by Julia Sugarbaker 7 · 2 0

This is a good question, I would like to know the answer as well. And no I don't think that you are condoning murder in any way by asking this question.
It does always seem to be some Christian groups that oppose abortion vehemently, and I have not yet heard of a Jew or Muslim killing a doctor that provides abortion to woman.
What say you all?

2007-04-28 05:58:14 · answer #2 · answered by meg3f 5 · 0 0

Around 400AD the christian priesthood decided that slaves could be made to produce better profits and become more obedient and hard working if their breeding was controlled like livestock. Christianity had banned all technology, and inquiry into the sciences, and the only way they could imagine to improve the profits of the Roman nobility was the same as was used to improve profits on the farms, through the controlled breeding of the livestock. The Romans considered their slaves the same as livestock, and christianity had the job of keeping them under control and profitable. So they devised a set of "morals" that forbade all sexual contact between men and women that was not approved by the church. This "approval" was in the form of "made in heaven" marriage where the priests chose the "marriage" partners and marriages were imposed for the life of the partners, thus giving control the characteristics of all slave children to the church. Women were compelled ro have as many children as possible in their lifetime because slaves were an important element of the wealth of the nobility, and every new slave added to that wealth. This was done through the forbidding of the use of any contraception. Abortion is nothing but a late term contraception method and the church has siezed on it in an effort to continue to exercise some small element of control over human procreation. Homosexuals came to be persecuted because of the difficulty in getting them to comply with this breeding scam. This scheme was concocted after chattel slavery was converted to serfdom and the slaves were no longer kept in chains at night. It failed to turn the slave race into mindless zombies because there was no way to prevent the "midnight sneak" as people sought relief from these repressive and loveless "marriages".

In 400AD more than 90% of the Roman population was slaves. The Jews never became slaves in this system because they cound not be made to be 'christians'. Islam was devised as a protection against christian imposed slavery. They were never involved in the slave breeding scam.

2007-05-05 08:15:01 · answer #3 · answered by charles s 3 · 0 0

Wow, such an unique question. One we've actually no longer considered earlier... permit me placed this obtainable rather slow simply by fact it style of feels you human beings have a large number of issues expertise. First, a infant isn't a murdering scumbag who has dedicated certainly one of those heinous crime against humanity that the perfect penalty would desire to be utilized. 2nd, this is not any longer 2 factors of the comparable coin yet you people who seem to have faith abortion would desire to be a potential of start administration can no longer get that by way of your cranium. Society has the ultimate suited and accountability to handle killers and criminals and the dying penalty is the perfect application of societal will. the easy certainty is, and that i'm nevertheless keeping it ordinary so which you adult men stand a raffle of expertise, that the dying penalty would be an effective device in coping with criminals and in deterring destiny acts have been it utilized as written. particularly the liberal approach of backing criminals and blaming the sufferer potential that we are forced to undergo multiple appeals and stretch a technique out a techniques previous this is needed limits. lower back i do no longer assume you to tug your head from the sand and face the certainty that your argument is hypocritical and stupid yet no rely the variety you attempt to obfuscate the info they'll continually will out. No, i do no longer care what different international locations are doing. No, i do no longer care that under a million% of the folk on dying row have been chanced on harmless. No, i do no longer care in case you mistakenly think of that the dying penalty has a racial bias. Do your individual examine and discover the place the two rather bias rather are contained in the criminal justice equipment. Have an afternoon.

2016-10-04 01:17:25 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Interesting question. Of course, one thing that some people who have answered can't hide is their own petty hatred of Christians, which really wasn't part of this question. It's hard for some to separate extremists from the equation because they are too busy petty petty in their hatred.

Of course, both Muslims and Jews are capable of acts which result in the murder of innocent people--bystanders and others.

I recall a few years ago acts of violence committed by Muslim extremists because they didn't like a beauty pageant.

It would be interesting to see Muslims answer this question, as opposed to seeing anti-Christian bigots just running their mouths and spewing out hatred.

2007-05-05 14:55:57 · answer #5 · answered by Jeff M 3 · 0 0

So far, I have only heard of Christians murdering the doctors and/or their staff. And only Christians bombing the abortion clinics and murdering innocent bystanders in the process.

2007-04-28 05:56:27 · answer #6 · answered by innocence faded 6 · 2 0

When a woman has the baby , and then kills it because it's ugly or noisy later, or isn't a boy she can sell- what is that called? I heard it was called a 'retraction' Is this true?

2007-05-05 03:04:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes, this is a very good question. I find it apalling and hypocritical that this occurs in my faith. It is worth looking into.

2007-04-28 06:01:38 · answer #8 · answered by mrs O 6 · 0 0

I don't know, but why does it matter. People from all faiths kill and they are singly responsible for their own actions.

2007-05-05 14:55:03 · answer #9 · answered by Star 5 · 0 0

It could possibly be because murder is wrong. Period.

2007-04-28 05:56:37 · answer #10 · answered by Brittany 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers