English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is it possible that a 4^300000 probabilities human's DNA molecule exists only because of a chance?
Why does a living coelacanth still exists? Shouldn't all of them evolute to amphibi?
If there's no mutant fertile even sex between the same mutant doesn't give any offspring then how does one species evolute to another?
What is the link between plantae and animalia?
Why the biogenesis do not occur again now as it did a few million years ago?
if evolution theory is right we should have a solid (continue) chain of species evolution process not a discrete one.

2007-04-28 04:55:05 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

16 answers

No, it is possible for human DNA molecules to exist because of natural selection, which is the exact opposite of chance.

Coelacanths are well adapted to their environment so there is very little selection pressure on them. And individual coelacanths would not evolve into amphibians, the species would.

Macro-evolution (species evolving into other species) is just micro-evolution (mutations inside of a species) on a much grander time scale.

Plants and animals are related in that we evolved from the same material. The divergence or split between plants and animals was very early on in our evolutionary history.

Abiogenesis may have happened many times since the first. It may have even happened before the current evolutionary line and then died out. If new forms of life were to pop up now by abiogenisis, they would easily be out competed by existing life.

Yes, you do expect to see a steady continuum of evolution, not a stair stepping. The stair stepping is due to imperfection in the fossil record, coupled with areas of quick evolution after a speciation event.

2007-04-28 05:13:52 · answer #1 · answered by Chris J 6 · 4 0

New species do exist Even 4^300000 possibilities (what type of probability expression is this besides) happen given adequate time A living coelacanth is obviously a genetically greater suitable type of fish that has survived in its environmental area of interest for 410 million years. Its offspring could have developed (no longer evoluted) into amphibians in spite of the shown fact that that's for sure nicely adapted and its line has persisted. Crocodiles fairly have an prolonged genetic historic previous. they are not pokemon and that they do no longer grow to be something else via the physique of ideas of evolution. Evolution happens with the physique of ideas of adjustments of a species DNA. perform a little analyzing. examine the wiki website. i'm beginning off to think of which you are the hyperlink between plantae and animalia Biogenesis is the physique of ideas of existence types generating greater existence types. it is going on now. that's probable occuring in a somewhat distinctive thank you to the way it became right into some million years in the past, in spite of the shown fact that that's in spite of the shown fact that occuring. Which evolution concept are you speaking approximately? learn punctuated equilibria. The "species inbetween" are those that died out and left no fossil record.

2016-10-14 00:14:52 · answer #2 · answered by garretson 4 · 0 0

I believe in God but your argument against evolution is wrong, as everyone who has studied evolution knows that environmental change does not occur continuously thus it is impossible for evolutionary change to occur continuously. Evolutionary change can only be observed over an enormous period of time, as proponents believe. I believe that what is ACTUALLY stupid is both religious and nonreligious peoples belief that evolution and the big bang are somehow explanations for existence. Thats the biggest masterpiece of stupidity i have ever encountered. What came before the Big Bang? Is it not possible that evolution was the method for creation?

2007-04-28 05:03:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

link between plantae and animalia? some animalia eat plantae... it's in the food chain..
and about new species, some people claimed they saw an alien or weird animal.maybe they ARE new species...

2007-04-28 05:06:46 · answer #4 · answered by vanilla latte 3 · 1 0

Unknown animals are being found all the time in the pacific south east. And remember, a species does not just pop into being, it evolved OVER A LONG TIME from its ancestors.

2007-04-28 05:01:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Are you so proud of your ignorance that you want everyone to know how dumb your questions are? Or, shall we wonder if it is possible that someone could be sincere in asking such childish and ridiculous questions? Have you looked in a mirror lately?

2007-04-28 05:17:03 · answer #6 · answered by Fred 7 · 1 0

The problem is to which extent the DNA needs to be different to be considered 2 species.OK? if the DNA is similar enough they can interbreed if it is not they cant.

2007-04-28 05:00:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Evolution is a very slow process. It takes aeons, so it's really not something that you can observe happening over a human lifetime.

2007-04-28 05:00:42 · answer #8 · answered by Julia Sugarbaker 7 · 2 2

Well there are some new ones, sort of, they are from cross breeding, or dna manipulations. Also toxins make animals mutate.

2007-04-28 04:58:09 · answer #9 · answered by iceblendedmochajavo 5 · 1 1

In other words, why don't we have chaos in evolution and why is there order instead in species. Good question and not one for which you will get an answer from Darwin's followers.

2007-04-28 04:59:03 · answer #10 · answered by defOf 4 · 3 3

fedest.com, questions and answers