Have you tried to create a universe recently?

Question

When studying theology in USA about 40 years ago, we had lecturer who taught in Socratic style. In other words, one of us would affirm a belief - based on our reading of recommended books - which he would then subject to cross-examination, with rest of us invited to join in. It was the best experience I ever had in open, challenging and friendly thinking. Someone one day posed the question of whether the imperfections of humanity and nature must be God's fault, and thus proof of God being neither omnipotent or loving. The lecturer posed an initial question: "Have you tried to create a universe recently?" Any takers on what answers came up in the subsequent discussion?

Answer 1

Douglas Adams had it right.
On catching sight of the immensity and complexity of the universe, most individuals find it disturbing and, rather than deal with it, prefer to move into smaller more comfortable universes "of their own devising".
Getting people to move out of the little cosy universe of "ideas they are happy with" can be a challenge.

More physically: no I've not made a universe, but then, I've never claimed to be omnipotent either.
As a model maker, a little of my character is revealed in what I have made.
If it's a God-made universe, something of his/her/its should be apparent in its nature.
Darwin commented:
"I cannot persuade myself that a beneficent and omnipotent God would have designedly created parasitic wasps with the express intention of their feeding within the living bodies of Caterpillars".

Stephen Jay Gould discussing this, and how it has been seen historically, below.

Even proponents of intelligent design tend to resort to "The Fall" to account for the less clearly beneficent bits of the world. Such as the location of my prostate gland. If that was designed in, I want words...

Answer 2

We all create our own universe. Whether its good or bad depends on us.
But if you want to take a break from intellectualizing over what many would consider to be pointless discussion (like in the kind that can never reach a conclusion) then go to Second Life.
There you will find a sort of heaven.

Answer 3

Well I was going to say that I saw something on the TV about being able to do that in a bottle. Some sort of science experiment. But they would not have know that 40 years ago. But hey, you are probably my age. Ah, what was the question again? ;-)

Answer 4

It would take 40 years to create a single celled organism.And I'm pretty sure I wouldn't succeed.

Answer 5

i imagine they are equivalent leaps of religion. What your humorous anecdote leaves out is time. With countless time and ink falling in countless kinds, who's to say that only one in each of those kinds would not be a delightful poem. With countless tries, it really is vitally a statistical truth. There has continuously been questions we gained't answer. the alternative we make is not any matter if to settle for "i do not comprehend" as an perfect answer. some can do this and others can't. human beings clearly concern what we do not realize. This has led to the concept of beliefs. beliefs and concern are very helpful constructs that could want to reason human beings to do impressive issues. solid and undesirable. If human beings are given countless time to study and study, do we not study a limiteless volume of issues? besides the indisputable fact that, this does not recommend there are not a limiteless volume of issues to study. So, in my opinion, I manage the question of it really is the bigger infinity? The issues we can study with countless time or the countless volume of issues that is realized? As we bypass alongside we believe what we opt to if no info might want to be shown to us. yet as we understand extra, extra questions are raised. For the followers of any faith, something that doesn't seem to have reason/info/records to provide an evidence is attributed to a god. yet as we realize it extra the reason is attributed to a god. Then we keep in mind that, and the reason behind the reason is attributed to a god. So what God "does" is really shifting alongside this continuum that follows precisely alongside the point of what won't be able to be defined. ex. faith: God makes the solar arise. technological expertise: the rotating earth makes the solar arise. faith: God makes the earth rotate. technological expertise: Earth rotates by using physics, faith: God makes the guidelines of physics. technological expertise: A grand unified theory makes the guidelines of physics. faith: God makes grand unified theory, See the problem the following? there is continuously a continuum of the unexplained which will be attributed to a god through theists. And this unexplained will continuously exist. you likely can answer "god" merely as really as announcing "IDK". in order to reiterate my answer on your unique question "they are the equivalent".

Answer 6

It seems it is far easier to create a God than it is to create a Universe. Hence we have all these religions sharing the same ONE Universe.

( Not that I seek to offend anyone that believes in more than one Universe)

Answer 7

I would have said let's not fill the gaps of knowledge simply with god did it.

Answer 8

I always have this logical question.... If God created the universe, where was he when he did it?

Answer 9

every morning when i wake up i create my own universe, i hope i wake up in a good mood tommorrow

Answer 10

No, I've been too busy evolving.