English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I see dumb cops with the motive in front of their faces are still spending tax payers money on looking for a motive that most smart people already know what the motive is thanks to the killers message and mass media. It's straight to the point unless your are cop?

Is thier a revenge motive from the department of justice to find someone else to punish for this sad event, sence they cannot punish the dead?

Can someone help make sense of this wasted energy of fighting crime?

2007-04-27 13:35:19 · 16 answers · asked by ruggedwarrior_love 2 in Politics & Government Law Enforcement & Police

When I asked to help make sence about of what I said in wasted energy in crime fighting, I see that some cops (active and retired) do not have the patience with that. There are some cops I can respect, but when a cops egocentricism shows, it will always become an obstical to crime fighting everywere, and those with the egocentricism issues usually never find the truth for thier heart is alreday covered for there cognition is then limited. This is a sorry statement that needs to be said.

Have fun with the voting.

2007-04-29 01:43:04 · update #1

16 answers

Because the world is filled with stupid people who love to file lawsuits and point all the blame on cops, they cannot leave any stone unturned. If they would have closed the case the first day you would be saying, why aren't they going to find out if there is other important information they are missing!

2007-04-27 15:53:38 · answer #1 · answered by Becky L 2 · 3 0

you just threw and incomplete pass on your Monday morning quarter back chance. why aren't you asking questions like, what is gonna happen to the teacher that had the red flags in front of them and did nothing. are the families going to hold that person civilly liable because of there lack of action. or the mental hospital that allowed him to go and state that he was mentally fit, or the guy on eBay that sold him the magazines. why is it that when the police are trying to do there best in a horrible situation like this, you find time to blame them. this is not the time to pass blame.but due to your past questions about George bush, and Americans being afraid of there own shadows, i can see that you only care about anti-government questions. this wasn't the death of a person of old age. this was a massacre. this is a part of American history and if you feel the need to not be completely informed of the situation, then i guess complaining about someone not giving you an answer as quick as it takes to make a hot pocket is what you need to do for comfort because you are truly a sad individual.

2007-04-27 21:43:41 · answer #2 · answered by officer 2 · 2 0

Those so called "dumb cops" are investigating all avenues. For such a heinous crime, there can be no questions left unanswered. The only stupidity that I see here are your comments, and questions. Another thing to consider is the cops want to be sure that everything is perfect, that way some lawyers won't come along and find a loophole, and screw up the whole case.

2007-04-27 20:41:26 · answer #3 · answered by johN p. aka-Hey you. 7 · 6 2

I think they are trying to find a motive as it pertains to the particular victims. Keep in mind that while one of the weapons was tied to the first set of shootings in the dorm, there is no evidence linking Cho with those first two shootings, other than circumstantial. If they can find a motive in regards to the particular victims, they can tie Cho to those first two killings. If they can't do that, one must consider that perhaps there was a second gunman. Scary thought, huh?

2007-04-27 20:40:36 · answer #4 · answered by sueflower 6 · 9 0

If you hate cops so much, think about this. What would the world be like if there WERE no cops? People would just do what they wanted. Chances are, you wouldn't have lasted too long.

2007-04-27 20:48:40 · answer #5 · answered by Josh C 6 · 3 0

Because if they don't conduct an investigation, every conspiracy theory nut will be screaming that there was a second shooter, or that he had help.

The WTC attack was on video, and people are still claiming that it was an "inside job." So seeing is not believing for many people.

2007-04-27 20:41:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

Thank you. I thought I was the only one that thought about this. It's the same as every day when you hear about a suicide bombing in Iraq and they say they have "yet to determine who's claiming to be the perpetrators". What does it matter in the first place, they are terrorists, spend our money and your time on stopping it from happening again.

2007-04-28 05:11:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Please, take the burden away from these poor "dumb" cops. Go down there and explain everything, hell, apply and become a cop, so you can save all us poor dumb souls.

BTW, noticed that nowhere in your little tirade did you tell us what the motive is or was, so please, enlighten the world.

2007-04-28 04:11:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

stfu man. when you look at those tapes, it doesn't make any specific references to any one person or thing. hes obviously nuts. they want to check into if the kid was a certified wacko and see if any laws were violated in the purchasing of the weapons. there are alot of things we need to check into after a murder, especially mass murder and then suicide.
you wouldn't understand
they need to check every single possibility because of the media frenzy. if there wasn't as many dumbfuks as you out there questioning everything the cops do, we might be able to work faster.

2007-04-27 20:39:39 · answer #9 · answered by Kevy 7 · 9 2

If you're so smart, please call a news conference. I'm sure a lot of people would like to see who they are supposed to worship. In fact, why don't you just go down to Virginia, and protect the whole state. If your needed any where else, I will personally contact you. I always wanted to meet the one person who knew everything.

2007-04-27 20:45:02 · answer #10 · answered by CGIV76 7 · 7 2

fedest.com, questions and answers