English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It won't affect India or China or Latin America and even in this country minorities continue to reproduce at a high rate,so what effect if any does it supposedly have on overpopulation? Just trying to set a good example,or is it some subliminal self-hating urge to race-suicide?

2007-04-27 12:38:28 · 8 answers · asked by Galahad 7 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

8 answers

U.S. liberals are a drop in the proverbial population bucket, and they are becoming less and less relevant with every child they don't have.

Their under-reproducing will have no effect whatsoever on anyone but themselves.

2007-04-27 12:42:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

I don't understand. India, China, and Latin America are a Parliament, Communist, and for the most part Socialist Governments. The closest two localities you mentioned that are somewhat related to liberalism is China and Latin America, they have huge populations and are very nationalistic. These places do not hate themselves.
What you are asking, that liberals are under-reproducing and non-liberals are over-reproducing caused by self-loathing and genocide in the world? That question is very confusing, try filling in the blanks and rephrasing your question.

2007-04-27 12:57:44 · answer #2 · answered by mrfurley_1974 2 · 1 1

The birth of even a single child affects the population crisis. Liberal or conservative, nothing alters the fact that, scientifically speaking, a human child is a burden on the environment. Anybody who is prudent enough to use birth control, regardless of their political stance, is doing their part to help curb overpopulation.

Here's a quote from Isaac Asimov:


"Which is the greater danger--nuclear warfare or the population explosion? The latter absolutely! To bring about nuclear war someone has to do something; someone has to press a button. And the immediate terror of the event inhibits the pointing finger…. To bring about destruction by overcrowding, mass starvation, anarchy, and the destruction of our most cherished values--there is no need to do anything. We need only do nothing except what comes naturally--and breed. There are 3 billion people on Earth now. There will be 6 billion perhaps in 2000. Nothing we can do short of nuclear or biological warfare of an extreme all-out nature will prevent that, if we do nothing."

2007-04-27 12:53:43 · answer #3 · answered by solarius 7 · 2 2

Maybe we should all turn gay. That would curve the population. Hey I have a theory about the dinasours. I think they all turned to homosexuality and stopped reproducing and all died off.

2007-04-27 12:47:55 · answer #4 · answered by mxcardinal 3 · 3 0

I wasn't aware I was 'underreproducing'. Should I throw away my condoms and have a child every 9 months? Good Luck finding a woman to go along with that......not to mention I couldn't afford it.

Someone tell me what the quota is.

2007-04-27 12:44:37 · answer #5 · answered by thewolfskoll 5 · 5 0

Liberals are at negative population growth!

Not trying to be mean it's a fact. Check population stats.

2007-04-27 12:43:28 · answer #6 · answered by Makemeaspark 7 · 1 0

Others need to follow the example. We are grossly over-populated as it is. We need to adopt the 1 child only rule like China.

2007-04-27 12:46:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

Mhm.

2007-04-27 12:41:15 · answer #8 · answered by SomeGuy 6 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers