wot a tosser......go out and get yourself a life and stop makin STUPID comments like that
2007-04-27 04:04:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by tizzy 5
·
6⤊
0⤋
At 5'11.5", and 172 pounds, I'm at a healthy weight. My friends, most of whom are done with the mom thing, are amazed at how thin I still look. Im just happy I still fit into most of my clothes. I would still be at a healthy weight even if I wern't five months pregnant. Yes, my baby is healthy as well. My husband thinks I'm the sexiest woman he's ever seen. That's all that matters.
Last summer I was down to 145 and very, very skinny.
I agree with the person who said that the more expensive the label, the smaller the size. While I cannot afford those brands off the rack (and I wouldn't want to pay that much anyway), I've tried on those brands at thrift stores. Admittedly, the clothes from thrift stores might have shrunk some in the wash, but still....
I'm almost out of my 14 jeans (a pair of Levi's, a pair of Lees, and a pair from Fashion Bug), but I have a pair of size 12 shorts that fit still (Eddie Bauer, I think) and a kahaki skirt that I just got (free and second hand), that is a size 12 and not only fits, but still has some growing room. Yet, my size 14 skirt from Lane Bryant and my size 14 shorts from Lane Bryant (the 14s are lefover from my bigger days, I wisely kept them thinking they would either work for during pregnancy and/or after) fit with growing room. I also have a pair of knee-length shorts that originally came from NY & Co. that are loose. (I don't like the shorts, I bought them from a dollar store several years ago and never returned them. I was going to stick them in a rummage sale with a few dollars off the tag, but their shorts and they fit and they save me money for now.)
It would be nice if there was more of a standard size in the clothing industry and none of this cheesy "vanity sizing".
2007-04-27 11:23:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Vegan_Mom 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Thanks. I was a size 0 model for about 3 years and let me clue you in on a lil fact....as you move up in pirce (designer) the clothing gets bigger. I can still wear a size 2 in most designer duds, even though in the juniors/cheap department I am no where near it.
GIRLS THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A SIZE 0.
For the true models, they took that size and determined that would be the smallest they made. and that is a 0. When I was a size 4 in most clothing (like a Target, department stores, Kohls, etc) I still was not big enough to fit into a 0 in Liz Claiborne, Ralph Lauren and barely fit into a 0 in Jones New York.
2007-04-27 11:06:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by phantom_of_valkyrie 7
·
6⤊
0⤋
Half the women in my family are now size 0's. They used to be size 6's. They haven't changed in size over the years, the sizes have.
The reason we have size 0 is not because some models are so thin. Ever seen twiggy? The reason we have size 0 now is so that ever-fatter baby boomer women can pretend they haven't changed in size in 20 years.
Soon we'll have to add size negative 2.
2007-04-27 11:53:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by kheserthorpe 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
After all those Runescape questions, it's easy to see that you are not of this world. In the real world, women don't look like those size zero models. Try to get out of the house sometimes, sweetie. I also noticed your question about having sex with your g/d, (you said it was painful for her). Does that mean your granddaughter???? If that's the case, then you are a child molester, a sexual predator. Could that be why you want girls to look this way, so they can remind you of babies? If I'm right, I could be seeing you on Dateline very soon.
2007-04-27 11:27:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by bombastic 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
I'm a guy and I just love Size zero models...when your done playing with them you can stack at least a dozen of them in a briefcase and you never need to pay for dinner!
Plus if you ever lock yourself out of the house you can always slip one under the door!... really you need to two or three to figure out how a lock works
2007-04-27 11:11:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by BigBadWolf 6
·
5⤊
0⤋
I take it this is a joke and if it's not then you are seriously messed up in the head. You obviously don't give a cr*p about all the girls starving themselves to be thin, with eating disorders, depression and serious body image issues that destroy their lives and affect their friends and families....no all you appear to care about is YOU...what a selfish, horrible individual you are. People like you disgust me, you should just do us all a favour and shoot yourself....................
2007-04-27 12:11:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well I suppose if you like hugging some one who is all bone, looks like they are about to snap and fall over in a gust of wind, may never be able to have children and have lots of health problems then thats up to you!
Personally I prefer a bit of meat on my bones.
2007-04-27 11:05:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
I think i'll disagree there. I think a woman is alot more attractive with curves, something to hold on to, you cant beat it! Stick thin models look sickly to me and i could'nt deal with someone who constantly moaned about putting on a pound due to that biscuit she just ate.
2007-04-27 11:05:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by Achilles 1
·
4⤊
0⤋
this isnt real. You cant even act properly. And by the way baby; what are you? 300 pounds? Get a life.
2007-04-30 16:11:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by DiamondKiss 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I actually agree becuase I'm only 5ft and I'm a size 2 and it looks fat on me.
Some girls don't need to be a 0 but there are some that should.
Theres absoultely nothing wrong with a 0 as long as your are healthy.
2007-04-27 11:05:33
·
answer #11
·
answered by xXskinnyjeansandaviatorsXx 2
·
0⤊
4⤋