English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-04-26 18:37:27 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Etiquette

11 answers

nope...a home does not have to be a HOUSE....as long as you have a roof over your head, and your stuff is there, and you live there, then no, you are not homeless :) for that matter, you could be living with someone else, and they be paying all the bills, and it still be your home :)

remember:

a house is not a home :)

home is where the heart is :)

2007-04-27 00:54:52 · answer #1 · answered by Cinna 4 · 1 0

Not at all. I guess a place where you call home is a home to you. An apartment is considered a home. There's completely nothing wrong with renting an apartment.

2007-04-27 01:45:09 · answer #2 · answered by . 6 · 2 0

NO, the term homeless applies to people without proper lodging . ( defined as running water, electricity, gas etc).

So even if you lived in a trailer you would not be homeless

2007-04-27 01:45:41 · answer #3 · answered by SupaMonkey 4 · 2 0

Homeless is when one does not have a roof above one's head.

So if you rent an apartment, you are not homeless.

2007-04-27 01:42:38 · answer #4 · answered by vach1970 2 · 3 0

only if you stop paying rent.

2007-04-27 09:46:50 · answer #5 · answered by endpov 7 · 2 0

No, it just means you're not a home owner, you're a renter.

2007-04-27 01:42:18 · answer #6 · answered by Katherine W 7 · 3 0

Ummm no

2007-04-27 01:45:07 · answer #7 · answered by chattylc 3 · 2 0

No

2007-04-27 01:58:09 · answer #8 · answered by Mariah 5 · 1 0

no, of course not

2007-04-27 02:36:44 · answer #9 · answered by sushobhan 6 · 1 0

oh puhhlease!

2007-04-27 01:57:34 · answer #10 · answered by Meiran 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers