Why are you so out of focus?
Why would I bother answering you? I mean, you ask a question that has nothing to do with the genuineness of the Bible, the 'religion, or the concepts within. Instead you ak a question that is rather silly. So what you are doing with this question is saying more about yourself and little to nothing about anything else.
You don't take study seriously, and so you think something that I have no reason to believe that you seriously considered. Perhaps you just joked your way into believing something that you heard one time?
Keep asking questions that lead to nowhere, and you'll just get nowhere with the understanding of it.
2007-04-26 18:01:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Christian Sinner 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
The bible doesn't tell every little detail of the things that happened just the highlights or the things God thought we needed to know. It says he created Adam and Eve it doesn't say he didn't create more people he may or not have. its against the law to marry those related to you but that is mans law and i think up until about the 1950's? it was legal and common to marry your cousin. us course i find that a little weird since i was brought up thinking that was not ok. I don't agree that the bible is stolen property but you are entitled to your opinion.
have a good nite!
2007-04-27 01:03:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by rachel5576 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Only we are family in bloodline
Not to marry withing our own family not another one
Mays and Greens are two seperate familys
I will always try my best to answer your questions, I have spent my whole life in the Bible and that is a long time, if I don't know it I will find it.....................
The King James Bible
Version Information
In 1604, King James I of England authorized that a new translation of the Bible into English be started. It was finished in 1611, just 85 years after the first translation of the New Testament into English appeared (Tyndale, 1526). The Authorized Version, or King James Version, quickly became the standard for English-speaking Protestants. Its flowing language and prose rhythm has had a profound influence on the literature of the past 300 years. The King James Version present on the Bible Gateway matches the 1987 printing. The KJV is public domain in the United States
2007-04-27 00:57:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Gifted 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is it possible that Adam and Eve were only the first 2 humans God created and put on Earth and then later on God created others in His image and put them on Earth with Adam and Eve? I thought about the same thing, but if you read further into the Bible, it says that their children married other women who weren't from their own parents, so I really don't think we all came from the same man and woman. Otherwise, we'd have all kinds of deformities from the same genes mixing up. The Bible just didn't mention any others he created besides the first man and woman
2007-04-27 01:12:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Kayla D. 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Adam and Eve were the first 2 humans created, that dosn't mean that God didn't create other people after he created the first two. If he didnt then How did Cain find a wife in another land after he was cursed by God? Its something to think about and research.
Genesis 4:16-17 16 And Cain went out from the presence of the LORD, and dwelt in the land of Nod, on the east of Eden. 17 And Cain knew his wife; and she conceived, and bare Enoch: and he builded a city, and called the name of the city, after the name of his son, Enoch.
2007-04-27 01:15:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Theoretically we are all cousins. I think Darwin nailed it and you are living under a rock if you don't believe it. I do believe in God though. Saw some guys once smoke pot using a piece of rice paper out of the Bible in the Hotel. Ironically, their house burned down that night. Crazy Stuff and Glad I left the room.
To me the Bible is the church's marketing flyer. Doesn't mean it's all true or all false. And I've heard some priests say some pretty whacky stuff and some that make sense. It's all interpretation.
2007-04-27 01:01:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by Hoosier 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, it would make us all related, and I think that's the point. Biblical law and governmental law are two totally different things. It was instituted for governmental reasons because of mutations from offspring physically and biologically. According to the Bible we are all brothers and sisters, but it also looks down on sexual relations in the family.
The Bible, is borrowed property. Much of our biblical stories were written MANY years before they appeared in Jewish text. The Zoroastrians (the three wise men's religion) were near the Jewish during the Babylonian Captivity and many of the stories were shared.
peace
2007-04-27 00:57:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by Meredith 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
The bible is not clear about the beginning of man. We only know that Adam and Eve were first but as for how everyone else came to be it does not say. The beginning of the bible seems to skip many years.
2007-04-27 00:57:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
We humans are all related, just ask any anthropologist.
It makes no difference whether you believe in creation or evolution the end result is the same.
Now the bible is a document which should be read as a document of allegory.
Now if you want to write off Christians as irrational that is your privilege, but I for one know we Christians who follow the example of Jesus are the first humanists.
2007-04-27 01:24:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Imogen Sue 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Have you ever thought about the fruit that Eve had eaten?
Anyway, it is only against the law cuz sin came into the world. Altogether, Eve IS Adam.. This doesn't make any sense does it?
2007-04-27 00:53:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋