I'm assuming by Africa you mean a specific country. Let's just say Ethiopia due to historical precedent.
No Greece could not help out because:
1) Greece's military isn't even close to as large as Italy's.
2) Greece and Italy are in the EU and therefore the two are legally prohibited from fighting one another.
3) Greece has no real vested interests in Africa that would warrant surrendering their relationship with Italy.
2007-04-26 15:36:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Chris 6
·
0⤊
3⤋
Sehwag is distinctive , basically because of the fact he didnt carry out upto the mark in first 2 tests doesnt recommend he would desire to be sidelined completely ~ He complete somewhat ok interior the final try sequence against england , as his rankings recommend: 117, 25 (ahmedabad) 30, 9 (mumbai) 23, 40 9 (kolkata) barring the duck at nagpur ofcourse :P somewhat an experienced batsman who tackles hearth with hearth on energetic pitches could have been a smart gamble . The indian team would want some "swifter" bring about SA situations, because of the fact its confusing to adhere around defensively accessible as we've considered communities getting out affordably in many circumstances in previous few years in SA~ As we've a solid midsection order ~ pujara, sachin, kohli and to be honest dhoni additionally , as he's physically powerful at stabilizing the Indian motels. interior the later section. So i could %. Sehwag for confident. the different opener would have been Vijay , yet as in line with the present state of affairs Shikhar cant be dropped so i'm no longer too confident of Sehwag's possibilities anymore. edit: "He hasn't scored a century away on condition that 5 years. " so what ! dhoni has on no account scored a century away ~
2016-12-16 16:36:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well Africa is a continent and the countries in that continent are killing each other.But if any country in Africa were to try and attack Italy individually,Italy does not need any help.
2007-04-26 15:38:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Africa is a continent thats under major civil war much less invade one country for the heck of it, Greece and Italy dont have much anyway but ya they could take out Africa
2007-04-26 15:34:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
lol, that's like saying asia is attacking us when there are many countries within and they all think and act differently. plus..I wouldnt be worried too much about Africa, Italy has machineguns that will sink their canoes and spears before they even leave their shores.
2007-04-26 16:54:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by Drock 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
I think people missed your point.
Ok, for the people who missed the hidden meaning:
Ancient cultures
The term "Greek love" has long been used to refer to the practice, and in modern times, "Doing it the Greek way" is sometimes used as slang for anal sex. However, the view that homosexual anal sex was a universally accepted practice in Ancient Greece may be misleading.
2007-04-26 15:35:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by 2007_Shelby_GT500 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
The Dark Kingdon of hebacuc would intervene and Launch a counter assualt against African Continent, we would begain our own War of Terror.
2007-04-26 15:38:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by ZORRO 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
it depends. if greece has anything to gain from attacking africa, then of course. but it'll have to consider UN policies and many politcal stuff that makes my head whirl=]
2007-04-26 15:37:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by Bao Pham 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Africa is a continent, not a country, it is also to the south of Italy.
Holy crap dude. Did you not take geography in the first grade?
2007-04-26 15:32:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by Mopp 3
·
0⤊
4⤋