Both are Christians.
Give me an argument stronger than "Lewinsky".
2007-04-26 11:03:42 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I am a Christian and I support both Clinton's. THAT woman (Lewinsky) means nothing. Bill was a handsome man in a position of power and I would not put it past the Republicans to plant someone like her there to bring him down. Sex is the downfall of every man. I don't hold that against him. He is an intelligent man, and was a good president.
As to Bush, the IDIOT, it is the right wing Christians that support him. Both have an IQ below 50.
2007-04-26 11:13:55 · answer #1 · answered by tonks_op 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Ooh ooh ooh I can give you a real good reason as to why that is the case. Bill Clinton is a Liberal Christian and George W. Bush is a I believe a Fundamentalist/Evangelical, or a Conservative type Christian. It's a classic double standar if you ask me. And as for the user Only My Opinion she's an idiot who doesn't know what the hell she's talking about.
2007-04-26 18:33:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Apparently letting a psycho hose-beast chase him down is worse than leading America to an unnecessary war, based on lies, that winds up with us fighting plain clothed insurgents, in urban settings, in the Mother freakin Middle East. Obviously letting the office stalker give you he@d is a far worse crime than robbing the nations coffers so your buddies at Halli Burton can build a private army and plunder an occupied people.
2007-04-26 18:10:36 · answer #3 · answered by St. Toad 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
a lot of us DID support clinton-i, for one, was absolutely disgusted with the lewinsky affair...but i though he did a much better job as president than his predecessor or his successor...i think that the current president is a disgrace to the office and a phony christian...
2007-04-26 18:10:40 · answer #4 · answered by spike missing debra m 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
A lot of Christians did. He was elected in a mainly Christian country, don't forget.
Fundies support Bush and they tend to be a bit, erm, louder than regular Christians.
2007-04-26 18:09:27 · answer #5 · answered by Sun: supporting gay rights 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
That's all they have... Clinton got a BJ in the White House. I have heard he traded "secrets" with China... but after reading up on it, they found no evidence of that.... he was getting into the TRADE with China.
I really wonder about some people's comprehension on things like this. It's amazing... the "telephone game" has NOTHING on this. lol
2007-04-26 18:09:20 · answer #6 · answered by Kithy 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Because Bush is pro-life and Clinton is pro-choice.
2007-04-26 18:09:01 · answer #7 · answered by Jonathan 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Because Clinton didn't support their religious delusions the way that Bush does.
2007-04-26 18:08:19 · answer #8 · answered by Atheistic 5 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Catholic. (umm, actually I am uncertain about this one)
And two, he didn't wear his faith on his shoulder as much as Bush did.
And three, he looked funny carrying a giant family bible to church.
P.S. I am not saying these are good reasons but these are some ACTUAL reasons.
2007-04-26 18:07:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Clinton isn't a Christian - he only claimed to be (Yea, he lied about that too) - Also he is a Democrat and pushed for things that Christians are against like abortion and homosexual marriage.
Also - he is a wimp and didn't defend our country against the 9/11 attacks
I could go on and on
2007-04-26 18:10:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 9⤋