Think of all the troops lives the USA Government saves by bringing the troops home.
2007-04-26 08:45:46 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
No, I thought it was pretty self serving and small of them. They knew he would veto it but took their time playing politics. Pretty small and petty.
Hey, I'll check you out at the Big Boy there in Mt Clemens, you can scope my veteran license plates and ask me why I support the troops. I'll not run off, we can possibly have a reasoned discussion, and I will leave you and the server a big tip (I can afford it, I'm a conservative)
"The world has achieved brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Our is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.. We know more about war than we know about peace, more about killing than we know about living."
- General Omar N. Bradley
2007-04-26 09:27:43 · answer #1 · answered by patrsup 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hmmm... I guess it's better to save soldiers' lives than civilians' lives, eh? Better thousands of civilians die in terrorist attacks than have soldiers dying trying to prevent that, hm?
I can understand how you liberals see it - that non-whites aren't worth dying for. You sat quietly while Clinton didn't stop the Rwandan atrocities. You didn't raise a peep about the genocide that has been ongoing in Darfur. You certainly couldn't be bothered by the hundreds of thousands of Iraqis who were murdered by Saddam. And you won't care how many Iraqis die in a destabilized Iraq, just as you didn't care how many Vietnamese and Cambodians died after you abandoned Vietnam. I disagree with you, but I understand you; you won't sacrifice for those you consider "subhumans".
If that's what floats your boat, I guess you're OK with the idiotic bill the craven Democrat Congressmen crafted.
2007-04-26 16:01:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
my husband has been over there many times, and has only had spent 3 Christmas's with us in 7 years, and i believe we should stay until the war is over. if it is over then send them home. what some people dont get is that is there job, they signed up for it knowing the pros and cons. and yeah it affects our families but we now its there job and support them. I chose to be his wife, and have also chose the government to rule our lives until he retires.
2007-04-26 16:52:43 · answer #3 · answered by andy a 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
we need to use our resources in places where it will actually matter - iraq isn't one of those places.
we never should have gone there in the first place.
iraq has nothing to do with 9/11, american security or the war on terror.
AND WE WON'T GET ANY PAYBACK FOR 9/11 THERE!!
time to declare victory and get the f' out of there!
2007-04-26 16:18:32 · answer #4 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
,yes yes i hope the troops can back home my husband-and father of our 4 little ones ,,,is in iraq we miss him
2007-04-26 15:55:54 · answer #5 · answered by lovepets 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
More troops died under Clinton's 8 years of peace than Bush's six years in office.
2007-04-26 15:50:04 · answer #6 · answered by Jester 3 · 1⤊ 4⤋
It's a symbolic vote assured of a presidential veto. It's just politics.
2007-04-26 16:11:50 · answer #7 · answered by Fredo Menjou 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Absolutely... in fact... I think they should start bringing them home even sooner... June would be very nice.
2007-04-26 15:54:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
yes i think that's when we need to pull them out. in stages.....
2007-04-26 17:17:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋