In my opinion, Madonna is doing something she believes to be right, but I think if she really wants to help then she shouldnt take children away from everything they know and love, she should give them the funds to grow there own food, have clean water, build schools and homes. I think that would be better as she is taking kids away from there familys.
Just because they dont have the luxureys that we do doesnt mean they love their children any less than we do.
I would rather live in complete poverty than give my kids away.
Ok so the parents are doing whats best for their kids but surely being taken away from parents and family to a completly diff country cant be good for the child.
Just my opinion.
2007-04-25 22:49:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jewels 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think that she adopted a child because she wanted too. I don't feel that she is trying to be another Jolie. Adopting a child is a serious ordeal and is not taken lightly. People adopt children everyday, what's wrong with Madonna wanting to adopt a child? Just because Angelina adopted 2 children first doesn't mean that she is copying her. In Hollywood, the media sees everything as a trend. If one famous person does something, then everyone else does the same thing. In child adoption this isn't the case. Adopting children isn't a fashion accessory that goes in and out of style, it is a life-time commitment.
2007-04-26 00:01:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by AdrianClay 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
I think you're listening to too much media hype!! She is saving a young child, maybe two, from a life of extreme poverty. I don't think this is about TEAM JOLIE or anything of the sort. Maybe she actually feels the need to finally use her fame and fortune to do some good. Remember she is not only adopting from Malawi but also aiding the country financially in building an orphanage.
I think people should forget about the media hype and let her get on with it!!
2007-04-26 06:31:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by niccog26 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Adoption is the most selfless, generous and truely good thing a person or couple can do - who cares if she sidestepped the authorities or even that he isn't either American or British? Would any of you have the guts to save a child from a life of poverty, loneliness and probably far worse?
Everything is getting blown out of proportion purely because she's famous, the boy's father probably wouldn't have batted an eye if the adoptive parent were you or I.
She can adopt 10 children as far as I'm concerned - good for her!
2007-04-26 04:44:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by cat on a hot tin roof 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think we don't understand the way of life for the rich and the famous. She would have all these things(nannies, someone to do the shopping,) for her natural born children so those are not the real issues. I am not sure why so many celebrities are now choosing adoption. I think it is a good thing for them to be spending their money on instead of many other alternatives. Sometimes I think we should just not pay them any attention and get busy planning and living our own lives.
2007-04-25 23:49:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by *Kimmie* 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
Everyone wants to be on Team Jolie I guess.............. What about the children here in foster care who need loving parents? There is nothing wrong with foreign adoption, but I still think about all the kids I see here and wonder why not them? Sad but true, people will follow celebrity trends, and I expect to see a huge influx in foreign adoption and a decrease in American adoption because of Hollywood.
2007-04-25 23:49:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
EVERY FAMILY IN THIS WORLD SHOULD ADOPT A CHILD AND GIVE THEM A GOOD LIFE.
2007-04-26 00:50:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by ENIGMA VS MYTH 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
She is saving a child from terrible poverty. What's wrong with that?
2007-04-26 00:00:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by notyou311 7
·
2⤊
2⤋