English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Instead of being called pro-abortion. They call themselves pro-choice. Haha what a way to sound innocent. I find it funny. Most don't realize that they are killing something God loves. They should find out what abortion is. Find out what it is!

2007-04-25 16:09:28 · 17 answers · asked by Lee Chamberlain 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

even if a women is raped. THe child is still innocent. It didn't deserve to die. HOw else can you argue that?

2007-04-25 16:21:46 · update #1

how do you decide what is best for the baby? the baby has no say in it whatsoever. So where is the pro-choice for the baby? Where is the baby's choice to choose to live? hypocrits.

2007-04-25 16:24:57 · update #2

17 answers

If you want to sell any product, one very important thing it must have is a good-sounding label. This is also known as "whitewash", and has been used for millenia.

Abortion is being sold as a "reproductive choice" for women, along with non-lethal methods of birth control. The idea is, women should be able to enjoy all kinds of sex, without worrying about being saddled with the "unwanted burden" of a child, or a husband, or any kind of personal responsibility.

The rape and incest arguements are CRAP. These violent acts account for less than 1% of all babies concieved, much less aborted!

No indeed, abortion is not about releasing a rape victim from a child she never wanted forced on her. It is sold as a choice, a form of birth control, a convienence. The innocent child becomes an unwanted burden, and is declared a non-human, a sexually-transmitted disease, not worthy of life.

If a D&C is a humane and civilized way to dispose of an unwanted product of rape, why can't we dispose of the rapist in the same manner? Shouldn't society have that choice?

It's all in the packaging.

2007-04-25 16:24:51 · answer #1 · answered by MamaBear 6 · 0 5

The problem is that abortionists love to "color coat" their phrases so that it won't sound as horrible as it really is.

For instance, they're not pro-abortion, they're "pro-choice". (The problem is, I'm pro-choice, too. I choose which clothes I'm going to wear today, what I'm going to have for lunch, the people I call friends...but in questions of ethics, there is only one right choice to make. In the case of abortion, it is wrong, and must be put a stop to).

It's not a child, it's a "blob of tissue." (The problem with this is that, at a fundamental level, we're ALL blobs of tissue and cells. But a child has the appearance of a human even before the earliest abortions are committed.)

It's not killing a child, it's "terminating the pregnancy." (They can't call it like it is.)

Again, more semantics. If you're not against abortion, then you're for it. Anyone "pro-choice" is pro-abortion. If you're not pro-abortion, then you're anti-abortion, and we should get rid of it. Besides, calling it a "hard choice" has proven our position. The only reason it would be a hard choice is if it really does put an end to a life. Otherwise, it wouldn't be a hard choice at all.

You can call it what you will, but the fact remains that abortion in all cases takes an innocent human life. All the facts support us being alive from the moment of fertilization (not just implantation). Once the egg is fertilized a unique, living human being is produced.

2007-04-26 09:49:25 · answer #2 · answered by new_creation2005 2 · 0 0

Why do the anti-abortionists say "pro-life" instead of "pro-government in women's medical care" or "pro-embryo over grown women" or "pro-god in government"?

Both sides use euphemisms. I personally support the choice to have an abortion, AND the choice not to. I don't think that early abortion should be banned under government, and I don't think that pro-choice is an inaccurate way to describe it.

I know what an abortion is, and I also know a friend who was raped at the age of 12. My opinion is that government should preserve the choice to an early abortion, and the choice to keep a pregnancy. But it's not something that should be forced due to religious views on ensoulment.

But pro-life usually means that you don't have the choice, except as nature allows (1/3 of all pregnancies miscarry without the woman even realizing it!). See the difference?

EDIT: So I'm a hypocrite? I'm talking about the time between a fertilized egg and an embryo, (not called a baby), and up to the first 12 weeks of pregnancy. Please read a biology textbook. Aside from religious arguments, a fertilized egg often fails to implant, has no ability to suffer, and no cerebral cortex to contemplate pain. Abortion at an early stage should be legal because almost all arguments against it are theistic in origin.

Don't get me wrong, I see abortion as unfortunate because it is a potential life, but I am not arrogant enough to inflict my views on another woman who doesn't have the resources to care for a real kid. So before you call someone a hypocrite, evaluate your own position. And by all means, donate to help those unwanted kids who you seem to want to protect, because your responsibility doesn't end after birth.

2007-04-25 23:15:39 · answer #3 · answered by Dalarus 7 · 7 2

Abortion is a touchy subject. i do believe that people have the choice to have or not have a child. but i dont like the fact that it is killing something that could become someone. if people arent ready to get pregnant then they shouldnt be having unprotected sex. and in the cases of rape. have the baby but if you dont want the rapists baby just leave it at the fire station no questions asked. im half and half on this subject

sometimes it is best for the baby to not be born tho. once apon a time about... 7 years ago on new years. a mother got so drunk she put her baby to sleep in what she thought was the crib. when the father came in the room because he kept hearing screaming he saw the baby on the heater and has burns over most of its tiny little body. part of me wished that the baby would die that day to stop the suffering. but the baby lived.

2007-04-26 20:01:44 · answer #4 · answered by Dont get Infected 7 · 0 0

Which god would that be?

No one is "pro-abortion". Pretty much everyone agrees that it's a sad situation and a difficult experience.

The differing of opinion comes in as to whether it's morally wrong or not.

I am personally anti-abortion for the most part - meaning that in my own life, were I to become pregnant, I would have my child unless my life were in very grave danger.

I am politically pro-choice, because I do not think your beliefs and my emotional standpoint on my own body should be legislated as law to millions of other women.

If abortion were illegal, women would go back to having them illegally and dying as a result. You would then be partially responsible for killing something you believe your god loves.

In fact, a whole lot of pregnancies end in miscarriage early on - most women have this happen without even knowing it, so you might ask yourself why a god who loves unborn babies would himself abort millions of them in such a way.

2007-04-25 23:28:17 · answer #5 · answered by Snark 7 · 2 0

Maybe it's none of your business.

I think i would rather have someone abort a child than to feed drugs into it's veins and abuse it after birth. So later child services and come and say, their home is just dysfunctional. The only thing you need in a kids home is a bed, 1 dresser and a can of food. It's pathetic.

Besides, our lives are eternal.... its energy can come back next time, when it won't be delivered to the Manson family.

Why do people think it's their business.... like the world isn't already crowded, starved and hurting.

Don't get me wrong, i have never had an abortion and i have 5 kids, but.... had circumstances arise where i was no way going to be good to my baby, was addicted on drugs and lived door to door banging who knows who for money.... trust me. Abortion is a good thing in some cases, NOT ALL.

2007-04-25 23:19:42 · answer #6 · answered by hypnosisbyjill 2 · 3 2

do you truly not see the distinction between pro abortion and pro choice?

someone could be completely anti-abortion, but be pro-choice. because they do not feel that its the goverment's place to take that CHOICE away.

pretty much nobody is FOR abortion. its that they are against taking away that freedom.

edit: the fetus is not a person until birth or near birth, thus it doesn't warrant to be treated like a full person.

the mother is a currently existing life. the not-quite-yet-baby is not. her opinion interest and views are infinitely more relevant.

2007-04-25 23:17:05 · answer #7 · answered by RW 6 · 5 0

I carried the fetus's to the furnace. I dislike the term innocents. I dislike it a lot when it's applied to Pro life , kill anyone who disagrees with them,types. I'll will return the favor by the way , I don't like you people, abortion or no abortion. Your beliefs are an insult to any self respecting diety, and have screwed up mankind for 2000 yrs. Please drop dead. I'm not innocent, never have been, and never will be. Thank you so much for your interest.

2007-04-25 23:22:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

I am very aware what an abortion is. And if you are against it ... don't have one... Education and birth control are such an easy solution. If we want to rid the world of abortion then lets teach our children safe sex instead of just abstinence. Lets make birth control easier and more affordable. Nobody is Pro-abortion but Pro-choice yes I am...I am also pro-adoption but mostly I am Pro- prevention!!!















l

2007-04-25 23:20:31 · answer #9 · answered by GI 5 · 4 1

I'm against abortion but I'm also against you. You sound like kind of a nutcase laughing at the pro-abortion group as though abortion is a funny subject. I suppose you're one of those people who goes to a horror movie and laughs hysterically everytime they show a gory murder.

2007-04-25 23:24:12 · answer #10 · answered by angry 6 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers