2007-04-25 05:56:03 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Health ➔ Diet & Fitness
both are healthy slow cooked is better as it's lower on the GI scale so it doesn't cause as much of an increase in blood sugar or insulin when digested
2007-04-25 05:59:42 · answer #1 · answered by lv_consultant 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Slow cooked oats are better from a Glycemic Index perspective as they take longer to digest than the quick oats. The steel-cut (non-rolled) oats are even better in this aspect. However, in terms of general nutrition (vitamins, sugars, etc.), there is no difference between the two -- as long as the quick oats are not sweetened!
2007-04-25 06:09:22 · answer #2 · answered by Strider_Vt 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Slow cooking oats that way you don't steam all the vitamins and minerals away from the oats.
2007-04-25 06:00:15 · answer #3 · answered by corazon 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
slow cooking oats
2007-04-25 05:58:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
hope this helps. slow cooking oats.
here's a link to great recipes for the oats. thought it might be helpful.
http://ezinearticles.com/index.php?Belly-Fat-Blasting-Oatmeal-Recipes-That-Are-Fast-And-Delicious&id=480094
2007-04-25 06:00:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Slow is better than fast...fast is better than many alternatives. âº
2007-04-25 06:05:59 · answer #6 · answered by . 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋