Has anyone else seen that TV show where they have proof that evolution could not possibly be true?

Question

As I typed this question, I am watching it and it is great. They have taken every nibble of evolution and proved it couldn't be true.

Guess the evolutionist will have to go back to the lab and do some more work.

Answer 1

LMAO! hold ... on ... laughing so hard ... can't type ... silly creationists ... always crack me ... up

Answer 2

If you are referring to Carl Baugh you should know that most creationists do not respect him very highly. The conservative, young earth, website answersingenesis advises creationists to not refer to Baugh as authoritative. Some of the arguments he advances do not hold up under scrutiny and therefore only serve to discredit creationism in the long run. Hugh Ross, an old earth creationist also has a TV show and he is more cautious than Baugh. Even creationists who differ with his old earth position will acknowledge that arguments that Ross presents for intelligent design are likely to be well researched and reasoned.

Answer 3

If they have "proof", you should really look at the science behind it because I guarantee you that it is flawed. There has been no credible scientific refutation of Evolution.

I've seen human population used to discredit evolution, but the people who tried to do it this way ignored the fact that population growth is not linear.

I've seen arguments using the level of topsoil, but forgot to account for rain runoff.

I've seen the arguments discussing complex organs, and Darwin himself addressed this adequately in "On the Origin of the species".

I'm not sure which arguments are being used as "proof" in the show you're watching, but I can guarantee that they are lacking.

Answer 4

tutor me any evidence that evolution is actual? in simple terms make certain it incredibly is clever. Evolutionists constantly supply solutions that dont make experience. in all probability cuz evolution would not make experience. God created the international and despatched His Son to die to maintain it. ~~~ So, for sure your ideas is closed and cemented close with little to no skill at serious concept! Why waste any time in any respect answering your disingenuous question! yet another hypocritical stupid (stupidity is planned lack of awareness!) Xtian heard from!

Answer 5

Proof, please? If a non-biased source actually proved that evolution isn't true, it would be all over the news. If you really are watching a show and not making this up, I'm guessing that it is biased propaganda paid for by some Christian organization that uses all the same old "arguments" we've been hearing for years.

Answer 6

No such thing as an evolutionist.

Evolution is a fact and theory.

That TV show is moronic.

*Edit*

Steve below: "Evolution is a hypothesis that has never been proved." -- it can't be PROVEN. Nothing in science is proven. It's not a hypothesis.

"Evolution claims, random change & natural selection make simple things spontaneously transform into more complex things without recourse to intelligent design." -- Spontaneous?! Try gradual... VERY gradual. Over millions of years gradual.

"Chance and random changes simply do not produce higher levels of organization & complexity." Mutations do - but not by themselves. There are four other driving forces of evolution.

Information on last comment: http://youtube.com/watch?v=I14KTshLUkg
http://youtube.com/watch?v=i9u50wKDb_4

Steve is as moronic as the show. ^^

Answer 7

evolutionists have presented countless undisputed pieces of evidence for evolution.

Its now on the creationists to prove their wrong:

Creationists must find a fossilized chihuahua to disprove evolution

Answer 8

You will never be able to prove that evolution is not true to the evolutionists. Their faith is too strong.

Answer 9

Man, thanks for saving me a lot of embarrassment. I almost told my friend evolution is true. Now that I have actually read on the Internet that some guy is watching a show, he didn't mention the name or channel it was on, that proves that it is not true, without mentioning any of the reasons it's not, I can save myself from being totally humiliated. Thanks, bro!

Answer 10

Yeah, that's the vehicle of choice for Groundbreaking Science News, all right... some nameless TV show.

Please define, scientifically: "Nibble".

Answer 11

That's funny - I'm going to bet that it's convincing you because you don't know anything about evolution, and that's what they're counting on. Looks like they fooled you. Too bad they can't convince any REAL scientists of it.