What are your feelings about global warming?

Answer 1

This is science. It's not about feeling or clever verbal arguments. It's about knowledge and data.

Global warming is real and mostly caused by us. Three reasons, with solid support, most important first.

There's an overwhelming amount of peer reviewed scientific data that says that. Short and long summaries.

http://www.globalwarmingart.com/wiki/Image:Climate_Change_Attribution.png

http://www.ipcc.ch/SPM2feb07.pdf

Science is quite good about exposing bad science or hoaxes:

http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/ATG/polywater.html

There's a large number of people who agree that it is, who are not liberals, environmentalists, stupid, or conceivably part of a "conspiracy". Just three examples of many:

"Global warming is real, now, and it must be addressed."

Lee Scott, CEO, Wal-Mart

"Our nation has both an obligation and self-interest in facing head-on the serious environmental, economic and national security threat posed by global warming."

Senator John McCain, Republican, Arizona

“DuPont believes that action is warranted, not further debate."

Charles O. Holliday, Jr., CEO, DuPont

There's a lot less controversy about this is the real world than there is on Yahoo answers:

http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/articles/home_page/329.php?nid=&id=&pnt=329&lb=hmpg1

And vastly less controversy in the scientific community than you might guess from the few skeptics talked about here:

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/306/5702/1686

Good website for more info:

http://www.realclimate.org

"climate science from climate scientists"

Answer 2

Though it makes no difference what my feelings are, or anyone else's, for that matter, my feelings are disgust, loathing, and fear. Nowhere in my research can I find factual data to justify the alarmist stance taken by global warming proponents. My analysis of NOAA provided data, using the harshest reasonable mathematical assumption, that of exponential increase in temperature, yields a trend curve that evaluates at 53.7°F for the year 2006, 5°F lower than the "consensus" estimate, and 1°F lower that the temperature taught when I was a child. The rate of temperature increase from this analysis is 0.2% per century, which can be approximated as 1.3°F in the next century. The compression of the time scale on the NOAA data to make this increase look more severe is disgusting. Distortion of the Mauna Loa data is just as disgusting. Certainly it shows a sharp increase in CO2 concentrations since 1957, and current levels are about 400 parts per million. By way of perspective, water vapor is every bit the greenhouse gas that CO2 is, and exists in our atmosphere in concentrations 25 to 100 times that of CO2, and is almost wholly responsible for any greenhouse effect on this planet.

The steps proposed thus far to counter this imaginary threat would, if carried out completely, result in the end of civilization as we know it. My fear is that the alarmists are so humgry for power that they will succeed in shouting down reason, and bring about such a collapse.

Answer 3

The globe is going to warm and cool over time no matter what we humans do or don't do. Even if we are responsible, there is nothing practical that can be done to significantly alter the course of climate change. We don't understand the dynamics involved well enough to meaningfully affect a system as immense as the earth in a purposeful way. And even if we could, there's always the chance we'll just make things worse.

Assuming the human race must continue, then we need to devote our resources and intellects toward figuring out how to survive a catastrophic climate change event as a species.
-

Answer 4

It's a HUGE PROBLEM! I can't believe that some people are not worried about it at all or don't believe in it. IT'S A FACT PEOPLE! Some people are like 'well the earth is going to blow up so why does it matter?' True, but that won't be for another 5 BILLION YEARS! And I rather have our planet ruined in 5 billion years because of nature reasons than the earth getting ruined in the next couple thousand years because George Bush won't push car companies to make more hybrids and battery powered cars!

So-I think it's something we have to DEFFINATLY worry about and something that should always be on our mind.

Answer 5

First, the planet is in an elliptical orbit around the sunlight. (Elliptical potential, certainly, egg formed). next, the Earths orbit additionally revolves around the sunlight, yet takes something from 15,000 to twenty,000 years to realize this. (think of approximately spinning an egg slowly on the table). the version in time is laid low with the gravitational pull of the different planets, as whilst all of them line up in a immediately line, they exert extra impact on the earth and its orbit than whilst they are unfold around. So, certainly, each so often, the Earth is the two closer to, or further away, from, the sunlight. This impacts the quantity of heat gained to warmth up the oceans. hence, over a protracted volume of time, you the two get extra warmth from the sunlight, or much less warmth. further to this is the certainty that, whilst the planets are in alignment, the extra beneficial gravitational pull can influence the tectonic plates on the earth, ensuing in extra Earthquakes and Volcanic eruptions, that's what we are presently seeing. The tectonic strikes, earthquakes, additionally influence the quantity of plasma/magma erupting from undersea volcano's, which additionally influence the sea temperatures and are the clarification for the El Nino and la Nina climate kinds.

Answer 6

Science by consensus is garbage and *definitely* no science, at all!

Look what happened when there was consensus that the earth was flat and that the sun revolved around the earth!

Answer 7

I feel pretty warm about it.

Answer 8

were all gunna die eventually. i cant wait to see wats gunna happen to our weather and earth in the next 70 years or so.

Answer 9

a joke to make headlines and make money