thats the only ones who responded
2007-04-24 10:40:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mars warming may be due to the Sun or to huge dust storms. Note the source.
"While evidence suggests fluctuations in solar activity can affect climate on Earth, and that it has done so in the past, the majority of climate scientists and astrophysicists agree that the sun is not to blame for the current and historically sudden uptick in global temperatures on Earth, which seems to be mostly a mess created by our own species."
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,258342,00.html
The vast majority of scientists agree that global warming is mostly anthropogenic(about 10% is the Sun, and that data is solid, verified, and peer reviewed) :
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/306/5702/1686
"Regardless of these spats, the fact that the community overwhelmingly supports the consensus is evidenced by picking up any copy of Journal of Climate or similar, any scientific program at the AGU or EGU meetings, or simply going to talk to scientists (not the famous ones, the ones at your local university or federal lab). I challenge you, if you think there is some un-reported division, show me the hundreds of abstracts at the Fall meeting (the biggest confernce in the US on this topic) that support your view - you won't be able to. You can argue whether the consensus is correct, or what it really implies, but you can't credibly argue it doesn't exist." -gavin
Dr. James Baker - NOAA
"There's a better scientific consensus on this [climate change] than on any issue I know - except maybe Newton's second law of dynamics". -Deltoid, ECOS Letter
Jerry Mahlman, NOAA
2007-04-24 17:47:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Bob 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Global Warming is nothing more than a political soap box just like the New Ice Age scare that came around in the 70's.
It's a normal process of the planet's ecosystem.
2007-04-24 17:46:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
global warming, although very important to consider, is not entirely due to human action, as the sun is getting hotter and hotter as we speak, which would surely be having an effect. the sun is around 4 billion years old, and i think they're predicting that it will end in a supernova, the gravitational forces take all the planets (plus pluto, because pluto isn't a planet anymore) with it. global warming wouldn't be happening this quickly if humans hadn't polluted it though, and we only have ourse;ves to blame for the accelerated rate.
2007-04-24 18:06:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
global warming is a bunch of crap used by car companies to get people to buy there 30grand hybrids
by the way what the crap does anthropogenic mean
2007-04-24 17:42:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Enough of words: just look at the situation of the polar bears: see how many of them are dying (drowning) because they can no longer find ice floats. Take a look at that huge hole in the ozone layer (as shown through a window of the space shuttle). Enough of blame. Time to do something to save this planet, the only one we have.
2007-04-24 17:44:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by robert43041 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
There's global warming on mars? wow where have i been?
2007-04-24 17:41:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by VmkRoxMySox 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
mars captures more heat.
2007-04-28 15:10:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by ben d 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
good question
2007-04-24 17:41:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by i love yooh!! 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
You are so dumb.
2007-04-24 17:40:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋