English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Oh and very cute all the "can you prove he does" arguments, perhaps you should at least study the ideology before negating it.
MY belief structure is not based on PROOF as is yours, MINE is based on FAITH, now does anyone intelligent want to answer the question?

2007-04-24 10:08:07 · 45 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

clearly the ideology you so greatly oppose you neglect to study and understand, how very scientific of you

2007-04-24 10:15:08 · update #1

45 answers

See this website. it will encourage you:
http://www.reasons.org/

2007-04-24 10:14:15 · answer #1 · answered by wefmeister 7 · 0 2

Nobody can disprove God exists. I can guarantee that nobody can ever prove He doesn't exist. I mean, there is a lot of proof on our side, and we don't need proof, we have faith. Some of the evidence God is real is the Bible. Look at the Bible Code. It is not the average fortune teller. It describes historical events that actually happened, such as The French Revolution, the American Revolution, World War I and II, and the assassination of the two Kennedys in clear detail. And this has been confirmed to be true by many scholars. And look at our universe. Many people use the evolution argument. Well, that works for a little while, but it only explains how humans evolved, not how we got here. It's impossible all life started at one moment without a Creator. So yes, God is real, and many people are too ignorant to realize He exists.

2007-04-24 10:19:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Mine is too. As has been often explained here, Atheism is based on a faith that the christian god and all gods do not exist.

Still, my faith requires much less effort than yours. You have to believe a wide assortment of things that your senses, people in general, scientists in particular, and natural law say cannot happen. I don't. Occam's razor also argues for god's non-existence. Even Pascal's wager only argues for belief as a insurance bet (and his premises are wrong).

Besides, the people agree with me, not you. If we asked everyone in the world if they believed in the christian god, the majority would say no. The majority would also say no to the hindu gods, the jewish god, the muslim god, and to any other god you care to name. I agree with them.

I am not sure what ideology you are ranting about. If you mean theology, I will put my theological knowledge (or that of a number of Atheists here) up against your's anytime. FYI, before I was an Atheist I was ordained in the Presbyterian church.

2007-04-24 10:11:23 · answer #3 · answered by Dave P 7 · 4 0

nicely in assessment to non secular nut jobs like Fireball, I have no ought to instruct or disprove god. I only attempt to stay a good life and on no account necessary faith to tell me appropriate from incorrect. i did no longer must be reborn ( forgive me for procuring it appropriate the 1st time ) All this god and devil stuff is only too fairy tale crap to me. i think it as much as i think of that Harry Potter is a actual guy or woman too. people get so labored up over a e book, written by making use of guy. I advise, who is conscious who those people have been and why do people only take it that those people have been trouble-free people and had no undesirable intentions. the main important's that no person is conscious and in the event that they say they do they are packed with it. If the god of the bible does exist, why could he have guy who he's conscious could twist his words write down his regulations and words. If he's conscious each thing even till now it happens then what may be the component in even turning out to be guy in the 1st place.If god does exist and is proper and all-powerful then why could he ought to wreck the international and do a do over? He would not! That to me only exhibits that the god of the bible is made up! individuals are only so frickin gullible that they believed some hippy guy who got here alongside and mentioned he's the easy and the life! I advise come on, if some one mentioned that to you you could in all probability say get the f u c ok out of here appropriate? I advise i've got considered David Blane the magician perform a little quite good stuff appropriate in the faces of persons, now could he have seen a god back then? in all probability. final analysis is not any one ever had to tell me it replaced into incorrect to kill my mom, i replaced into only born innately understanding that. If i ought to believe something that Jesus mentioned it could be " the dominion of god lives interior of you and all around you, no longer in development produced from stone. improve a rock and you will discover me, split a peace of timber and that i'm there ". faith for my section often is the downfall of guy. So positioned the e book down reason this is in straight forward terms a techniques f u c ok !

2016-10-03 12:27:12 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Everything we have learned about the earth and ourselves serves as massive mountains of evidence to disprove the Bible. Disproving the Bible disproves God.

Other than what we know that contradicts the Bible, it contradicts itself many times over. There is ample evidence to suggest much of its stories were plagerized from other religions before it such as Mithraism.

Of course, you could argue against Geology, Archaeology, Anthropology, Genetics, Biology, Physics, Chemistry, History, and every other scholarly discispline. I'm sure you can argue that your faith outweighs tens of thousands of people's work and research over centuries.

By the way, I was raised Christian. I know exactly what it's like to believe in the Word of God and to pray and to put faith in the almighty.

2007-04-24 10:18:19 · answer #5 · answered by Frank 6 · 1 0

The burden of proof lies with the believer. If I were to tell you I had a little green man in my closet, and then asked YOU to prove that it did NOT exist, you would think I was insane. Upon me telling you that the little green man lives in my closet, the first thing you would be most likely to ask is if you can see the little green man. It would not make sense for me to say "He is in my closet but I can't show him to you. I have faith that he is in there but I cannot prove it to you that he is. You prove to me that he is not in there! The fact that you can't prove there is no little green man in my closet is proof that the little green man exists."

The fact that you cannot disprove God is NOT proof of God.

2007-04-24 10:20:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I asked you if you could prove that Quetzalcoatl doesn't exist. I'm still waiting for YOUR response on that one.

By the way, FAITH??

Faith is totally without redeeming value and in fact oftentimes an enabler of and conduit for violent conflict. Faith is not a valid epistemological procedure and should not be regarded as a trustworthy method of ascertaining the truth value in any claim or concept. Faith allows for baseless dogmatic certainty in the absence of and sometimes in spite of justification and reason.

Faith is like "rolling dice for the truth". If I said "a roll of this di will reveal to me the truth. If it's 1, the sky is blue. If it's 2, the sky is fluorescent orange. If it's 3, hot pink; 4, light green; 5, silver; 6, firetruck red. Ready, steady, GO". Even if it DOES land on 1 and manages to coincidentally settle on a truth, it was just that - a COINCIDENCE. Similarly, faith is about as reliable as a coincidental roll of the dice. It can NEVER ascertain or determine the truth, only stumble upon it by blind chance.

As for me and my mind, we will depend on rationality and reason.

2007-04-24 10:14:19 · answer #7 · answered by ZER0 C00L ••AM••VT•• 7 · 6 1

Wait, you're basing something on faith yet you want intelligent answers? How come you don't have to be intelligent to say something but we do?

Oh, and also we are not the ones that made the assumption of an invisible being in the sky so its up to you to prove that it exists not us to prove that it doesn't.

2007-04-24 10:12:22 · answer #8 · answered by Laura 5 · 7 0

In a short answer, YES I can, however if you cannot wrap your mind around the philosophy and logic that I've studied, what's the point? Which is why I continuously tell you that if your faith works for you then that's what's best for YOU.

What's the point in continuing to hammer away? If you want to understand what I do, study Buddhism and various religions, and the sciences, and various philosophies and then come on back and we'll debate. Until then, what's your point?

_()_

2007-04-24 10:13:20 · answer #9 · answered by vinslave 7 · 5 1

Faith is forcing yourself to believe something that intellect would normally reject or no one needs faith.

I can not disprove a negative so no, I can not prove Zeus does not exist. Same goes for Tyr and Odin.

2007-04-24 10:17:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Actually Atheists have a burden of proof to defend their own faith in the religion of science.

1. Where the "F" does the big bang come from?? Just "poof"- everything is suddenly flying out of nothing. That sounds suspiciously fanciful to me...

2. We know that entropy is a fact and that all things degrade of their own volition if left alone... Then what's making stuff? Why would anything want to bond and hold together? Why doesn't stuff just fall apart?

2007-04-24 10:15:48 · answer #11 · answered by Bran McMuffin 5 · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers