How did they define religious vs. non-religious parents?
What represented better behavior and adjustment?
What other factors could explain the discrepancy? Were there proper controls?
Did this look at cross-cultural families or only at one culture or geographical region?
Why do you call it a fact when it is only a simple correlation that has shown up in this particular study? Correlation does not prove causation. Jumping to such a conclusion is a logical fallacy.
^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^
2007-04-24 06:02:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by NHBaritone 7
·
12⤊
3⤋
Ah I like how you claim that "Kids with religious parents are better behaved " and then add in your details "of course Pastors kids are the most screwed up".
2007-04-24 06:24:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
there is not any longer something incorrect with you in any respect. in actuality you're extraordinarily intelligent. maximum older music (from the 50's on is a lot greater beneficial than the crap they produce now. all of it sounds the comparable. lots of it has no melody. this is basically a drum device enjoying the comparable beats repeatedly. this is like music made by employing machines to make money. lots of the older era (like me) fell in love with music because of the fact it certainly meant something in those days. The stuff being made now all sounds the comparable and maximum of it is definitely forgettable. "previous" music as you call it continues to be as common right this moment because it exchange into interior the 60's-80's. around relating to the early ninety's music grew to become absolute crap. It ability no longer something. It says no longer something. A twelve months from now you will no longer bear in mind what you heard yet you will continuously bear in mind a Janis Joplin or Johnny money music. That exchange into actual music made by employing actual human beings. right this moment's music is cranked out to make money and not something greater. best for you for having flavor in good music.
2016-10-13 09:14:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by morabito 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I doubt Yahoo Answers RS is proof of anything.
2007-04-24 06:05:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Probably, but wait till they get older and realise their parents are hyprocites: the father's evading tax and the mother's sleeping with the postman. That's why adolescents are so messed up, cos they become disillusioned and realise that religion isn't perfect.
An example of religious hypocrisy: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=As0wC5tpqxBQw07PaD1n_mvsy6IX?qid=20070424090042AAlti7Y
2007-04-24 06:05:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
Hmmm..... when I was in high school, the wildest kids in my class were the ones that came over from parochial school. So go figure.
2007-04-24 06:10:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by milomax 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Cite the source please.
In my experience, the children of Wiccans and Buddhists are some of the best behaved.
2007-04-24 06:03:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by LabGrrl 7
·
5⤊
2⤋
I've had tons of hate mail, epithets and insults hurled at me by believers on this forum. So I'd say, no.
Here's a perfect example. It was posted last night when I wasn't even here. Look at Purple Majesty's answer:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AmUgaSClb0ILePBjqu7F2UTty6IX?qid=20070423231759AAFce2Y&show=7#profile-info-8d6fe6d924dc159ca0d2a6f01790bf61aa
2007-04-24 06:04:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by I WALK FUNNY 1
·
3⤊
2⤋
Weren't the VA-tech kid's parents religious?
2007-04-24 06:03:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
1⤋
No R &S is not proof because we have very little evidence from Y!A about the user's backgrounds or their overall behaviors.
BTW, what is your source?
2007-04-24 06:03:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋