English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-04-23 23:08:02 · 6 answers · asked by hedZy ♀ The Dancing Banana 4 in Health Other - Health

6 answers

this is a truly easy one. the most expensive and life threatening risk is DEFINITELY...nancy pelosi. ever since the days of the emporers new clothes fable, people have had faith in something for nothing. liberals came to power in the "razor thin" mandate of 06 claiming to have a magical pill or quick fix to al qaeda and its attacks on the us. history has proved otherwise. perhaps if clinton had kept it zipped up and responded to the uss cole, afircan embassy bombings or wtc one, america wouldnt be where it is now, but that wasnt the case and that scenario brought us to where we are today. Now after the "quick fix" the pelosi/reid regime promised america what we have is circumventing the constitution through granting non tax paying territories (who just happen to be liberal...SUPRISE) voting rights, granting the District of Columbia(again SUPRISE) who just happens to be liberal, states rights without being a state as well as 757gate, another attack on the health care system with the intent to nationalize it and so on. The real danger becomes cut and run. In a feeble attempt to keep a so called promise to the electorate, we are now faced with a "leader":in congress openly courting a known terrorist sympathizer state to woo a solution to the saving face problem shes created, and a course of events in leaving our soldiers dangling through ridiculous pork projects and lack of funding that in the words of Bob Gates, emboldens the enemy and gives them an open invitation to our shores. Knowing that the liberals are preparing to crucify our armed forces, al qaeda has already stepped up attacks and the damage to our credibility worldwide at this point is crystal clear. Harry Reid echoed Ms. Pelosis sentiments yesterday by stating somehow the liberal extremists could come to the table in a bi partisan spirit preaching failure and retreat. The concept is not only ludicrous but also literally deadly. If threatening the security of the United States isnt the most life threatening, kindly tell me what is.

Expensive. again, obvious. Nancy, as well as John Edwards have gone on record stating *(exact quote) we have no choice but to raise taxes. Reagan proved in the 80s this is a faulty and non sensical liberal concept.

FACT, TAXES DONT ENCOURAGE ECONOMIC GROWTH, THEY STIFLE IT.

no doubt at all...nancy gets the award. unusual response but my point here is obvious and very reasearched.

2007-04-23 23:53:06 · answer #1 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0 0

George Bush

2007-04-23 23:16:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Actually I have. It made me think about how humans can easily die, nothing is secure. I really was thinking about every detail for ages. I was crossing a road and this motorbike came out of nowhere, it was a tiny space away from me, if I would of put my leg out, I would of had it crushed into my ribs, everything. When I was younger I fell inside a pond and I couldn't swim, lol. My aunt got me out. I'm 15. and no, nobody has ever tried to kidnap me.

2016-04-01 04:45:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

In what context?? Life in general? Or contrasting sky diving and racecar driving??

Sandy

2007-04-23 23:13:04 · answer #4 · answered by Sandy M 5 · 0 0

Going to space????

2007-04-23 23:18:24 · answer #5 · answered by tanjarine 2 · 0 0

sex

2007-04-23 23:14:23 · answer #6 · answered by FlatTyrz 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers