English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

are there any other planes coming to answer F22 raptors?


will soviet's T-50 or su-37 reach american raptors?

2007-04-23 19:58:37 · 7 answers · asked by varma 1 in Politics & Government Military

7 answers

i think Mig 35 can match that.F 22 is too costly

2007-04-24 21:11:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No there are not. The T-50, it is an advanced trainer to prepare pilots for next generation aircraft like the F-16 and the F-22. If the T-50 does go into combat, it will be as a light-combat aircraft and will have no chance against the F-22. The T-50 only has a top speed of 1.4 mach and a max g-load between -3 and 8 g's. The F-22 can go faster, turn harder, and fly higher. The F-22 can perform tactical maneuvers at 60,000 feet. That is almost twice as high as the T-50.

The Su-37 "Super Flanker" is a good aircraft, better then the Su-27 it is based off of, but it is still not as good as the F-22.

The Su-47 "Berkut" is a testbed for developing technologies for the next generation of aircraft. It is basically an Su-35 with forward swept wings.

The only aircraft on the horizon that could really give the F-22 a run for it's money is the Mig-35, but the program was scraped in 1997.

2007-04-24 04:46:27 · answer #2 · answered by duvie13 1 · 0 0

F22 would kill most aircraft in the world but it has its vulnerabilities.Even if it can fight against 5 F-16s at the same time.This is because an expert fighter pilot in the USAF managed to lock on to an F22 in a dog fight simulation while piloting an F-18 Superhornet.There is no plane that would be able to take on an F22 Raptor without an ace pilot or an elite pilot,let alone the only planes that are known in the world to be able to actually put up a fight against an F22 or manage to destroy it (with an elite ace pilot ofcourse) is the Su-30MKI and the F-18 Superhornet and maybe the J-XX which is not developed yet.The F-18Superhornet is from the USAF ofcourse and it did manage to lock on to a F22.The F-18Superhornet had a highly trained pilot and the F22 had a regular pilot.The Su-30MKI is from India.Recently when they wargamed with France's most advanced fighter planes (considered superior to the Super Hornet but inferior to the F22) and these planes are the Rafale and the upgraded Mirage 2000.In a wargame with the French the IAF (Indian Air Force) managed to have a much higher kill probability and according to an article they were shocked by the Su-30MKI's preformance.The Su-30 was built by Russia and there is an MKK verzion China is using.Su-30 was able to have a 90% kill probability against the F-15 in a training excercise between India and the U.S.The MKK is what China uses and its their most advanced plane.The MKI the highly upgraded one by India is considered more advanced but in smaller production quantity.The IAF has about 50 MKI aircraft right now where as the Chinese have more MKK aircraft.Lastly its the Chinese J-XX which could put up a fight against the F22.The J-XX is in user trials and is going to be inducted very soon.Its going to be more advanced then the MKI and equal to the Raptor.

This is the Soviet response.Actually right now they are known as Russia.The F22 Raptor can easily take on most of the aircraft in the Russian Air Force and the only aircraft that could manage to stand up to it is their Su-27 and Su-30s,but there are 250 of them in total.So the F-18 Superhornet and F-16 and the F-15E along with the F22 could obliterate them.However they have some 400 Mig 29s which would fight well against the F-15 and F-16.But after America's airforce is reduced to half and Russia's airforce is reduced to 40% then the F22 would eventually win.

There is the argument that the F22 has stealth but most of the time this can only be useful with dogfights or against any military force that does not possess the S300.They have among the most advanced radar systems on Earth and are credited with shooting down a B117 Stealth bomber above Serbia and damaging another one.And this was with the first variant and the older verzion which was not upgraded.The S300 is the only ground threat.The other one is not much of a threat unless used in large quantities and thats the Tor-M.There has to be 2-3 focusing on a single F22 Raptor to bring it down.

2007-04-25 21:21:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There has existed for some time and used in civilian airports a radar like device that senses the airflow around the craft rather than the craft itself. Also the F-22 is not stealthy "up close." There is a stand off distance to where it's radar signature is reduced to the size of a bee. That's because stealth slightly reflects the radar signatures, but as the F-22 gets closer to the radar, more of the bouncing signal gets picked up by the enemy radar. That means the F-22's best bet at winning in an airfight is not to get into a dog fight, because at that range the F-22 is no longer stealthy.

The friction off the plane also creates energy which can be picked up by sensors. These sensors have to be modified to be useful though.

There is also the swamp method. That means producing more long range weapons than the U.S. can handle. The Russians can probably make 600 long range missles for the cost of one F-22. The Russians can destroy the F-22's base which would force the F-22 to land where the pilot doesn't want to land such as a highway.

2007-04-24 03:56:59 · answer #4 · answered by gregory_dittman 7 · 0 0

The S-37 Bekrut is their answer. It is a fighter that is more manouverable than anything the US has and it also incorporates stealth technology. The only thing which may prevent it from being used by the Russian military is the cost. But now that the US are planning missile sites in Europe I wouldn't be surprised if these S-37s are being produced.

2007-04-24 03:19:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The Soviet Union has been dead since 1991. Do you mean Russia?

2007-04-24 03:01:47 · answer #6 · answered by gone 6 · 0 0

yes there are
russia may not have much money as america but they do have the technology and expertise

2007-04-24 03:08:00 · answer #7 · answered by YR1947 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers